Changzhou Juteng Gas Spring Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Changzhou Juteng Gas Spring Co., Ltd. is a China-based gas spring supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 4,200+ sqm and 60+ staff. The company focuses on gas spring and gas strut products, including automotive tailgate/hood gas springs, customized force gas struts, and hydraulic door-related gas spring products. Its profile shows strong platform credibility, including 11 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Recent business activity is moderate, with 60+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating is excellent at 5.0, but the review base is limited to 5 reviews, which restricts confidence in long-term customer feedback reliability. Delivery performance is acceptable but not top-tier, with an 85.7% on-time dispatch rate. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small to medium-volume sourcing, sample validation, or customized gas spring procurement, while larger buyers should further verify quality systems and production consistency.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Jiangsu, China
- Factory area: 4,200+ sqm
- Workforce: 60+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope: automotive gas springs, custom gas struts, hydraulic door-related gas spring products

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined manufacturing base with measurable factory space and staff count. A 4,200+ sqm facility and 60+ employees indicate a real production organization rather than a purely trading-oriented storefront, although the scale is not large compared with major industrial manufacturers. The product listings show concentration in gas spring and gas strut categories, suggesting a relatively focused product line.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic-to-medium manufacturing capability through factory area, employee count, and verified supplier status. However, the provided data does not indicate a large-scale production base, advanced production capacity, annual output, major factory certifications, or detailed equipment information. Therefore, it fits better into the medium or lower-medium factory category rather than a large stable supply chain.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification/industry label provided: “Response time ≤4h”

Elaboration
The supplier has a long operating history, with 11 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance support provides an additional transactional protection mechanism for buyers. The verified supplier status also strengthens platform credibility. However, the certification or industry label information is limited, and no specific factory management certification, product compliance certification, or international quality certification is provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale
The long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status form a strong platform credibility profile. The main limitation is that the listed certification label is service-related rather than a product, factory, or compliance certification. Since the core credibility indicators are strong but certification completeness is limited, the score is high but not maximum.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past six months: 60+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥270.4K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 5

Elaboration
The supplier shows active recent transaction records, with more than 60 orders and CN¥270.4K+ in transaction value over six months. This indicates that the store has actual commercial activity and buyer conversion. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the low number of reviews limits the statistical reliability of customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The order volume and transaction value suggest stable but not high-volume business performance. The perfect rating supports a positive view, but only 5 reviews are insufficient to fully validate service and product consistency across a broad customer base. Overall, the supplier demonstrates moderate commercial validation rather than high-volume, mature market proof.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Platform label: “Response time ≤4h”
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within four hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online sourcing. Some product titles include customized force gas struts, which suggests product customization may be available at the product level; however, the dataset does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” capability or broader customization service coverage.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is reasonable but does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. Since Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the service capability cannot be rated as strong. The supplier appears capable of basic communication and possibly product-level customization, but the available data is insufficient to confirm advanced service capability.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 85.7%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate falls within the 80% to 89% range. This indicates generally acceptable delivery reliability, but there is still a visible risk of delayed dispatch compared with suppliers exceeding 90%.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7 to 8 points. At 85.7%, the supplier is in the middle-to-upper part of this band. The performance is suitable for regular procurement with reasonable lead-time buffers, but it may not be ideal for urgent or highly time-sensitive orders.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 5
- Verified supplier / factory verification: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The store rating is excellent, but the review base is very limited. Five reviews are not enough to establish a broad and statistically reliable customer satisfaction profile. The verified supplier status provides some quality and legitimacy support, but the dataset does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, quality certifications, or inspection documentation.

Scoring Rationale
The 5.0 rating is positive, and verified supplier status adds credibility. However, the low review count and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection prevent a higher score. The supplier has basic quality credibility, but buyers should request inspection records, product specifications, tolerance standards, and pre-shipment inspection evidence before scaling orders.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 76 / 100

• Company Strength: 14 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
• Business Performance: 15 / 20
• Service Capability: 7 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 8 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 14 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Changzhou Juteng Gas Spring Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking gas springs, gas struts, automotive tailgate/hood gas springs, or customized force gas spring products in small to medium order volumes. The supplier has strong platform credibility, long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and active recent transaction records.

The main risks are limited customer review volume, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, absence of detailed factory or product certification information, and delivery performance below the 90% premium benchmark. Buyers should start with sample orders or controlled trial orders, verify product specifications carefully, and request quality inspection documentation before placing larger-volume orders.

The supplier’s growth potential lies in its focused product category, verified operating base, and long platform presence. If it can provide stronger quality control evidence, more certification documentation, and improve on-time dispatch performance, it could become more suitable for larger or repeat procurement programs.