zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Dongguan Bluefinger Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Dongguan Bluefinger Electronics Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, focusing on tablet keyboard cases and related keyboard case products for iPad and Samsung tablet applications. Based on the available data, the company shows a moderate manufacturing scale, with a factory area of 2,500+ sqm and 70+ staff, supported by verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is comparatively strong, with 11 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and visible capability tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and response time within 5 hours. Business performance appears stable, with 80+ orders and CN¥1.7M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.7 store rating and 30+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking flexible MOQ, tablet keyboard case sourcing, ODM/customization support, and relatively reliable delivery. Key limitations include limited disclosed information on production capacity, detailed factory certifications, and a relatively moderate review volume.

Detailed Analysis

  1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 2,500+ sqm
- Employees: 70+ staff
- Verified supplier/factory audit status: True
- Detailed production capacity: Insufficient Data
- Specific factory certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
Dongguan Bluefinger Electronics Co., Ltd. demonstrates a defined physical manufacturing base with a reported factory area above 2,500 sqm and more than 70 employees. This indicates that the company has more than a basic trading-office profile and likely maintains internal operational capacity. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s physical and operational existence.

However, the available data does not disclose monthly production capacity, number of production lines, machinery details, or specific factory management certifications. Therefore, while the supplier shows evidence of stable small-to-medium manufacturing capability, the data is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale supply chain operator.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier fits best within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the highest tier. Its factory area and staff count are credible but not large-scale by procurement benchmarking standards. Verified supplier status strengthens confidence, but the absence of disclosed production capacity and specific factory certifications prevents a higher score.

Final Score
15 / 20

  1. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full customization, Response time ≤5h
- Factory or supplier verification: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. An 11-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides additional transaction protection for buyers. The listed tags also show that the supplier has platform-recognized service and quality-related capabilities, including Finished Product Inspection and customization-related support.

The compliance profile is strong from a platform perspective, but the available data does not include independent third-party management system certifications or named product compliance certifications. Therefore, the assessment is based on platform credibility and disclosed supplier verification, not broader regulatory compliance.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification status, and multiple relevant platform capability tags. These factors place it near the top scoring range. A full score is not assigned because detailed external certifications are not provided.

Final Score
19 / 20

  1. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past six months: 80+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥1.7M+
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 30+

Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated recent commercial activity, with more than 80 orders and over CN¥1.7M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active buyer engagement and a measurable sales record rather than an unverified or inactive storefront. The 4.7 store rating is positive and suggests generally satisfactory buyer experience.

The review count of 30+ provides some customer feedback validation, though it is not large enough to be considered high-volume social proof. The order and transaction levels support a stable mid-level business profile, but not yet a high-volume leading supplier profile based on the disclosed figures.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows stable and credible business performance, supported by recent orders, transaction value, and a good store rating. However, order volume and review volume remain moderate rather than high. This supports a score in the stable medium-scale transaction range.

Final Score
16 / 20

  1. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤5h
- Full Customization: Listed in platform tags
- ODM service available: Listed in platform tags

Elaboration
The supplier shows documented service capability through platform tags indicating Full Customization and ODM service availability. These are relevant for buyers requiring product adaptation, branding, or specification adjustments for tablet keyboard case products. The response time of within 5 hours is acceptable for international procurement communication, though it is not at the strongest service level defined by response within one hour.

No additional data is provided regarding dedicated account managers, sample lead time, engineering support, or after-sales service process. Therefore, the service assessment is limited to response time and customization capability.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has clear customization and ODM capability indicators, which support a solid service score. However, the response time is ≤5h rather than ≤1h, so it does not meet the top-tier service benchmark. The lack of additional service-process data also limits the score.

Final Score
7 / 10

  1. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 93.8%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 93.8% is above the 90% threshold, indicating relatively strong delivery reliability. For procurement teams, this suggests the supplier has a reasonable ability to meet agreed shipment schedules based on platform-recorded performance.

The data does not include average lead time, peak-season performance, logistics methods, or delay dispute history. Therefore, the delivery assessment is based strictly on the disclosed on-time shipment rate.

Scoring Rationale
With an on-time delivery rate above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery-performance scoring band. A score of 9 is appropriate because 93.8% is strong, though not near-perfect, and supporting lead-time details are not provided.

Final Score
9 / 10

  1. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.7
- Review count: 30+
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed in platform tags
- Verified supplier/factory audit status: True
- Detailed defect rate or return rate: Insufficient Data
- Product compliance certificates: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, supported by more than 30 reviews. This indicates generally favorable customer feedback, although the review base is still moderate. The Finished Product Inspection tag is an important quality-control indicator, showing that the supplier has some form of inspection process before shipment.

The verified supplier status further supports quality credibility at the supplier-profile level. However, there is no disclosed defect rate, return rate, inspection standard, quality control workflow, or specific product certification information. As a result, quality confidence is good but not fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates a good quality foundation through a strong rating, customer reviews, Finished Product Inspection, and verified supplier status. The score is kept below the highest range because the review volume is not large and detailed quality metrics or product certifications are not available.

Final Score
16 / 20

Total Score

82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Dongguan Bluefinger Electronics Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing tablet keyboard cases, iPad keyboard cases, Samsung tablet keyboard products, and related ODM or customized products. The supplier is most suitable for small to medium-sized buyers, e-commerce sellers, brand owners testing product lines, and procurement teams requiring flexible MOQ options.

The main strengths are strong platform credibility, 11-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, and a solid 93.8% on-time delivery rate. Business performance is also credible, with CN¥1.7M+ transaction value and 80+ orders over the past six months.

Key risks include insufficient disclosed data on production capacity, specific factory certifications, product compliance certifications, defect rates, and detailed quality-control procedures. Before placing large-volume orders, buyers should request samples, confirm customization specifications, verify quality standards, and clarify lead time, warranty terms, and inspection requirements.

Overall, the supplier has good growth potential and appears suitable for trial orders and scalable cooperation, provided that quality and production details are verified before larger procurement commitments.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Dongguan Fangbei Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fangbei Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Linkwin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Linkwin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Annxin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Annxin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tcang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tcang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xuanjing Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xuanjing Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Daly Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Daly Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fuyue Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fuyue Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Andu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Andu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Maiyu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Maiyu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Onegol Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Onegol Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xunguang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xunguang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingyang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xingyang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Shipai Kailong Electronics Factory Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Shipai Kailong Electronics Factory Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Taizheng Precision Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Taizheng Precision Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Baiao Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Baiao Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Citysing-E Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Citysing-E Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinkaiyou Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinkaiyou Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Qinghai Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Qinghai Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Haozhi Automotive Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Haozhi Automotive Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kangfa Thread Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kangfa Thread Industry Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Guangdong Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Qixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Canmax Electrical Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Canmax Electrical Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Lvlai Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Lvlai Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Artgift Trading Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Artgift Trading Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shiwei Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shiwei Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Kelansini Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Kelansini Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jiahe Non-Woven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jiahe Non-Woven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Angsi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Angsi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sanshui Rongying Kitchen-Bath Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sanshui Rongying Kitchen-Bath Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Cowan Wire Mesh & Machines Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anping Cowan Wire Mesh & Machines Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang City Qiangsheng Plastic Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang City Qiangsheng Plastic Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Jinhang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Jinhang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fnirsi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fnirsi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Honghaosheng Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Honghaosheng Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Chiyue Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Chiyue Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Lao Wan Eco-Friendly Stove Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Lao Wan Eco-Friendly Stove Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bond Optoelectronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bond Optoelectronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jiahe Non-Woven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Jiahe Non-Woven Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Mishiqi Watch Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Mishiqi Watch Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026