Dongguan Xiluo Mold Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Dongguan Xiluo Mold Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Dongguan Xiluo Mold Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of over 7,000㎡ and more than 110 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized manufacturing supplier focused on cold heading dies, thread rolling dies, screw molds, nut forming molds, and related precision tooling products. The supplier has Gold Supplier status for 3 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a moderate level of platform credibility. Its recent business activity shows 30+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 20+ reviews. However, response time is within 5 hours rather than within 1 hour, and on-time delivery is 80.6%, indicating acceptable but not outstanding service and delivery performance. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking medium-scale tooling suppliers with verified platform presence, moderate transaction validation, and low MOQ options.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Weight: 20 points

Basis

• Company name: Dongguan Xiluo Mold Technology Co., Ltd.
• Country/Region: China, Guangdong
• Factory area: 7,000+㎡
• Employees: 110+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Main listed products include cold heading dies, steel dies, flat thread rolling dies, screw punches, and nut forming molds.

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported production site exceeding 7,000㎡ and a workforce of more than 110 employees. This indicates a medium-sized manufacturing operation rather than a small workshop-level supplier. The company’s product listings are concentrated in mold and die-related categories, suggesting a focused production scope within precision tooling and fastener-related forming components.

The presence of verified supplier status strengthens the company’s credibility from a manufacturing-capability perspective. However, the provided data does not include detailed production equipment, annual output, R&D team size, quality laboratory details, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the supplier shows a stable manufacturing base, the available information is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale or highly advanced production enterprise.

Scoring Rationale

A factory area of 7,000+㎡ and 110+ staff supports the assessment of a medium-sized stable factory. The verified supplier status further supports its basic manufacturing credibility. However, the data does not show large-scale production capacity, internationally recognized factory certifications, or detailed production line information. Therefore, the supplier fits best within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale supply chain category.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Weight: 20 points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry labels provided:
• Response time ≤5h
• On-time delivery 80.6%

Elaboration

The supplier has a Gold Supplier profile with 3 years of platform history and supports Trade Assurance. These are positive platform credibility indicators, especially for buyers who rely on transaction protection and supplier verification mechanisms. The verified supplier status also adds a layer of credibility regarding the supplier’s business presence.

However, the Gold Supplier history is relatively moderate at 3 years, not yet indicating long-term platform maturity. The provided certification or industry labels are operational indicators rather than comprehensive compliance certifications. No specific ISO certification, product certification, export compliance certification, or third-party factory audit certificate is provided in the data. Therefore, compliance credibility is acceptable but not fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform trust elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These factors justify a solid score. However, the 3-year supplier history is not long enough to be considered highly mature, and the provided certification label set is limited. Since no additional compliance certifications are provided, the supplier should be rated as credible but not top-tier in platform and compliance strength.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Weight: 20 points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 30+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥405.6K+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier shows measurable business activity over the past six months, with more than 30 orders and a transaction value exceeding CN¥405.6K. This indicates that the supplier has real recent transaction history and is not an inactive or unverified commercial profile. The 4.9 store rating is strong, and 20+ reviews provide some level of customer feedback validation.

However, the order volume and review count are moderate rather than high. The data does not indicate very large order frequency, high-volume recurring buyers, or a broad international customer base. The transaction value is meaningful but not sufficient to classify the supplier as a high-volume commercial performer based only on the provided information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates stable medium-level commercial performance. The combination of 30+ recent orders, CN¥405.6K+ transaction value, a 4.9 rating, and 20+ reviews supports a positive assessment. However, the commercial scale is not high enough to justify an 18–20 score, which would require stronger evidence of high order volume, larger transaction value, and more extensive customer feedback.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Weight: 10 points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤5h
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data
• Other service capability information: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time is within 5 hours, which is acceptable for standard sourcing communication. This suggests that the supplier is likely capable of responding within a normal business communication cycle. However, it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response time within 1 hour.

No information is provided regarding Full Customization, design support, engineering communication, sample development workflow, after-sales support, or dedicated account management. Since the products are mold and die-related, customization may be commercially relevant, but the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports full customization. Therefore, service capability must be assessed conservatively.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has an acceptable response speed, but not a highly responsive one. The absence of confirmed Full Customization or detailed communication capability limits the score. A rating in the middle range is appropriate because the supplier is reachable within a reasonable timeframe, but there is insufficient evidence of advanced service support or strong customization capability.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Weight: 10 points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 80.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 80.6%. According to the required scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% falls within the 7–8 point range. This indicates acceptable delivery performance but also shows that delivery reliability is not at a premium level.

For buyers with strict project timelines, this figure should be reviewed carefully. An 80.6% on-time delivery rate means there is some risk of shipment delays, especially for time-sensitive tooling or production-support components. The data does not provide lead time, average delay length, or logistics performance details, so further delivery validation would be required before placing urgent or large-scale orders.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets the 80–89% delivery performance band, but its figure is close to the lower end of that range. Therefore, a score of 7 is more appropriate than 8. The supplier’s delivery performance is acceptable but should not be considered highly reliable without additional delivery records or order-specific commitments.

Final Score

7 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Weight: 20 points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 20+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification report is not provided.

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9, which indicates generally positive customer satisfaction based on the available feedback. The presence of 20+ reviews provides some validation, although the review volume is still moderate rather than extensive. Verified supplier status adds credibility, but the provided data does not include detailed quality system information.

There is no specific information confirming Finished Product Inspection, quality control procedures, inspection equipment, defect rate, material traceability, or third-party quality certifications. For mold and die products, quality consistency, dimensional accuracy, material selection, and working life are critical. However, these technical quality indicators are not included in the provided data and therefore cannot be assumed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s 4.9 rating is a strong positive factor, and the review count gives a reasonable but limited customer feedback base. Verified supplier status also supports basic credibility. However, the absence of Finished Product Inspection information and detailed factory quality verification prevents a higher score. The supplier has good visible feedback but insufficient evidence of a comprehensive quality assurance system.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Dongguan Xiluo Mold Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking a medium-sized Chinese supplier for cold heading dies, thread rolling dies, screw punches, nut forming molds, and related tooling products. The supplier is especially suitable for small to medium-volume procurement, trial orders, sample development, and buyers who value low MOQ options, as several listed products support MOQs of 1 piece or 1 set.

The main strengths are its 7,000+㎡ factory area, 110+ staff size, verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance support, 4.9 store rating, and recent transaction record of 30+ orders with CN¥405.6K+ value over six months.

Key risks include limited quality system visibility, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, no provided evidence of Full Customization capability, and an on-time delivery rate of 80.6%, which is acceptable but not strong. For critical tooling projects, buyers should request technical drawings review, sample validation, inspection reports, production lead time confirmation, and shipment schedule commitments before bulk purchasing.

Overall, the supplier shows stable medium-level capability and reasonable growth potential, but further due diligence is recommended before strategic or high-volume cooperation.