zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Gauke International Trading Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

GAUKE INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO.,LTD is a China-based supplier located in Hubei, with a reported factory area of 41,000+㎡ and 290+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company shows solid manufacturing and operational capacity, supported by verified supplier status, 9 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, finished product inspection, full customization capability, and a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Its listed products are mainly first aid kits and CPR face shield masks, with MOQs ranging from 1,000 bags/sets to 10,000 pieces.

The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking scalable sourcing of first aid-related products with customization requirements and reliable delivery performance. However, business validation is somewhat limited by only 10 orders in the past six months and just 2 customer reviews, despite a 5.0 store rating and CN¥540.9K+ transaction value. Buyers should further verify product compliance documents, detailed inspection standards, and sample quality before large-volume procurement.

GAUKE INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO.,LTD

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Hubei, China
  • Factory area: 41,000+㎡
  • Employees: 290+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a sizeable reported production base, with more than 41,000㎡ of factory area and over 290 employees. This indicates a relatively strong physical and labor foundation compared with small-scale trading or workshop-type suppliers. The verified supplier status also provides a basic level of credibility regarding the company’s existence and operational setup.

The provided data does not include detailed production line numbers, annual production capacity, equipment lists, or factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company demonstrates strong scale indicators, its actual production efficiency and capacity utilization cannot be fully assessed from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the profile of a medium-to-large stable factory based on factory size, staff count, and verified supplier status. The production base appears stronger than a small factory and should be capable of supporting bulk orders, especially given the MOQ levels shown in the product data. However, because detailed production capacity data and specific audit documentation are not provided, a full score is not assigned.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Platform/industry labels:
  • Finished product inspection
  • Full customization
  • Response time ≤3h
  • On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 9 years, which indicates a relatively long platform operating history. Trade Assurance is also supported, which can provide buyers with additional transaction protection through the platform. The verified supplier status strengthens platform credibility, while the listed labels suggest that the supplier has certain operational and service capabilities recognized on the platform.

The compliance-related data is mostly platform-based. Although product names reference standards such as DIN13164 2022 and EN13164, the provided dataset does not include actual certificates, test reports, issuing authorities, or expiry dates. Therefore, formal product compliance should be independently verified before procurement.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has strong platform credibility due to 9 years of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These factors collectively show a mature and credible platform presence. However, because detailed third-party compliance certificates are not provided in the data, the score is kept slightly below full marks.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 10
  • Transaction amount in the past 6 months: CN¥540.9K+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded CN¥540.9K+ in transaction value over the past six months, which indicates that some commercial activity has taken place at a meaningful value level. However, the number of orders is only 10, suggesting that transaction frequency is relatively limited. The store rating is excellent at 5.0, but this rating is based on only 2 reviews, which is not enough to establish a highly reliable customer feedback pattern.

The business performance therefore shows moderate commercial validation but not a large volume of repeated buyer activity based on the available data. The transaction amount is a positive indicator, while the low review count and limited order count reduce confidence in broader market acceptance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier does not reach the level of high-order, high-review, highly validated commercial performance. Its transaction amount is reasonable, but order count and review quantity are low. The 5.0 rating is positive, but the limited review base weakens statistical reliability. Therefore, the supplier is assessed as having moderate but not strong business validation.

Final Score

13 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤3h
  • Full customization: Listed as available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within 3 hours, which is acceptable for cross-border sourcing communication. The availability of full customization is a positive service capability, especially for first aid kits where buyers may require customized contents, packaging, labeling, or kit configurations.

However, the response time does not meet the highest benchmark of within 1 hour. The provided data also does not include details such as design support, sample lead time, dedicated account management, after-sales process, or customization case examples.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good service capability because it supports full customization and maintains a reasonable response speed. However, since the response time is ≤3h rather than ≤1h, and because deeper service-process information is not available, it is not scored at the top level.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator in the provided dataset. This suggests that completed platform orders have been shipped according to agreed timelines. Reliable delivery is particularly important for procurement programs involving seasonal demand, regulated product launches, or replenishment cycles.

The data does not provide the number of shipments behind this delivery rate or details by product category, shipment size, or destination. Therefore, while the delivery metric is excellent, buyers should still confirm lead times, production schedules, and logistics arrangements for future bulk orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, it receives the maximum score for this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 2
  • Finished product inspection: Listed
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a perfect store rating of 5.0, which is a positive quality and satisfaction indicator. It also has a finished product inspection label, suggesting that some form of final inspection process is recognized on the platform. Verified supplier status further supports basic credibility regarding the supplier’s operating profile.

However, the review count is only 2, which significantly limits the reliability of customer feedback analysis. The data does not include defect rates, inspection reports, quality control procedures, product testing documents, or detailed buyer complaints/claims history. Product quality should therefore be verified through samples, inspection criteria, and compliance documentation before placing large-volume orders.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has good quality-related indicators, including a 5.0 rating, finished product inspection, and verified supplier status. However, the very small number of reviews prevents the supplier from being classified as having highly proven customer feedback. The quality framework appears credible at a basic-to-good level, but the feedback sample size is insufficient for a top-tier score.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 18 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 13 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 83 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

GAUKE INTERNATIONAL TRADING CO.,LTD shows strong supplier fundamentals, including a large reported factory area, 290+ staff, verified supplier status, 9 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, full customization capability, finished product inspection, and 100.0% on-time delivery. These factors make it suitable for buyers seeking first aid kits, car first aid kits, CPR face shield masks, and related products with moderate to large order quantities.

Suitable customer types:
- Importers and distributors requiring customized first aid-related products
- Buyers looking for suppliers with established platform credibility
- Procurement teams prioritizing on-time delivery and factory scale
- Customers able to meet MOQs of 1,000 bags/sets or 10,000 pieces depending on product type

Main risks:
- Only 10 orders in the past six months
- Only 2 customer reviews, limiting feedback reliability
- Product compliance documents are not provided in the dataset
- Detailed production capacity, QC procedures, and audit reports are Insufficient Data

Growth potential:
The supplier has strong operational foundations and platform credibility. If it can increase order volume, accumulate more verified reviews, and provide clearer product certification and quality documentation, its procurement attractiveness would improve further.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Autoline International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Autoline International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Minjin International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Minjin International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Oone International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Oone International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Zhuoyu International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Zhuoyu International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zibo Changteng International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zibo Changteng International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Polyway International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Polyway International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jinhuimo International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jinhuimo International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Hyrt International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Hyrt International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Shuangli International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Shuangli International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Easy International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Easy International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Masuma (Guangzhou) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Masuma (Guangzhou) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Juyuan International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Juyuan International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Techgong (Shanghai) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Techgong (Shanghai) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Samac International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Samac International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongsheng (Beijing) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongsheng (Beijing) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongsheng (Tianjin) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongsheng (Tianjin) International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Haitian International Trading Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Haitian International Trading Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuyang International Global Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuyang International Global Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Leo&Jerry International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Leo&Jerry International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Cad Industry Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Cad Industry Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Yancheng Jingxin Glassware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Jingxin Glassware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aomi Water Purification System Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aomi Water Purification System Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Fukang Medical Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Fukang Medical Supplies Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangshan Guye District Hanchuan Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangshan Guye District Hanchuan Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Xifa Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Xifa Network Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Mingliang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Mingliang Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haifeng County Huasheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haifeng County Huasheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinhuaxu Rubber Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinhuaxu Rubber Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Kumi Silversmith Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Kumi Silversmith Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Baoshengxin International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Baoshengxin International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Chegongshe Hardware Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Chegongshe Hardware Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen First Stone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen First Stone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Oscar Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Oscar Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuji Galaxy Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuji Galaxy Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bayannaoer Weimei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bayannaoer Weimei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kecheng Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Kecheng Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Rongtai Labware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yancheng Rongtai Labware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Linkland Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Linkland Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Changsheng Cutting Tool Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Changsheng Cutting Tool Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026