zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd.
Country/Region: Guangdong, China

Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier operating in the second-hand clothing and thrift bale segment, with listed products including branded jackets, mixed second-hand clothing bales, thrift store clothing, and Ukay Ukay-related apparel bales. Based on the provided data, the company shows a solid operational foundation, supported by a factory area of over 23,000㎡, more than 200 staff, and supplier/factory verification status. Its platform credibility is strong, with 8 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and inspection-related platform tags. Business performance is also notable, with over 100 orders and CN¥12.8M+ transaction value in the past six months. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking bulk second-hand clothing supply with low MOQ entry points. Key strengths include transaction history, delivery reliability, and platform-backed credibility. Main limitations are the lack of disclosed production capacity details, absence of explicit full customization capability, and limited information on third-party certifications beyond platform-related verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 23,000+㎡
  • Employees: 200+ staff
  • Verified supplier/factory status: True
  • Product scope shown: second-hand clothing bales and thrift apparel products

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a relatively strong physical and organizational scale. A factory area exceeding 23,000㎡ and a workforce of more than 200 employees indicate that the company is not a small trading-only operation based on the provided data. The verified supplier/factory status further supports the credibility of its operational presence. Its product listings are concentrated in second-hand clothing bales, suggesting a focused category orientation rather than a highly fragmented product portfolio.

However, the available data does not include detailed production capacity, monthly processing volume, warehouse throughput, sorting lines, equipment details, or export market coverage. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have a meaningful operating scale, the assessment cannot confirm whether it reaches the level of a fully large-scale industrial supply chain.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier exceeds the basic threshold for a stable medium-to-large operation due to its 23,000+㎡ facility, 200+ staff, and verified supplier status. These indicators support a strong company foundation. Nevertheless, because detailed production capacity and factory certification information beyond verification are not provided, it is more appropriate to score slightly below the highest range.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Finished product inspection
  • Response time ≤3h
  • Verified supplier/factory status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. An 8-year Gold Supplier history indicates a relatively long-standing presence on the platform. Trade Assurance support provides an additional transactional safeguard for buyers, particularly for payment and order protection. The presence of Finished Product Inspection as a platform tag is also relevant from a compliance and quality assurance perspective.

The supplier’s profile also includes a “Low MOQ for customization” tag, which suggests some customization-related flexibility, although it does not confirm full customization capability. The verification status further strengthens platform credibility. No additional independent certifications, industry-specific licenses, or international compliance certificates are provided in the dataset, so those areas must be treated as Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has most of the key platform credibility indicators: long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, verification, and inspection-related tagging. The 8-year platform history is a meaningful trust signal. The only limitation is that certification depth beyond platform-level labels is not disclosed, so the score should remain high but not perfect.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥12.8M+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Review count: 80+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity. Over 100 orders in the past six months demonstrates active demand, while CN¥12.8M+ in transaction value indicates a significant transaction scale. The store rating of 4.7 is positive and suggests generally favorable buyer satisfaction. The review count of 80+ provides a reasonable base of customer feedback, although it is not extremely large relative to highly mature platform sellers with hundreds or thousands of reviews.

The combination of high transaction value and good rating supports the conclusion that this supplier has been commercially validated by buyers on the platform. However, the available data does not disclose repeat purchase rate, buyer geography, major customer types, dispute rate, or refund rate. These missing elements limit deeper verification of long-term business stability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier qualifies for a high score due to strong six-month transaction value, meaningful order volume, and a solid 4.7 store rating. The review count is sufficient to support credibility but not large enough to justify a maximum score. Overall, the business performance is strong and commercially proven within the provided data.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Platform tag: Response time ≤3h
  • Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates acceptable service responsiveness, with a stated response time of no more than three hours. This is a positive indicator for international buyers who need timely communication during quotation, sampling, order confirmation, and shipment coordination. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag suggests some degree of flexibility for customized requirements or buyer-specific order arrangements.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization. It also does not provide details on dedicated sales support, multilingual service capability, sample handling, after-sales response, complaint handling, or customization workflow. Therefore, the supplier can be considered service-capable, but not confirmed as a high-customization service provider.

Scoring Rationale

A ≤3h response time is good but does not meet the top-tier benchmark of ≤1h. The supplier has some customization-related indication through “Low MOQ for customization,” but Full Customization is not confirmed. Therefore, the score should reflect solid but not premium service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s delivery performance is excellent based on the provided on-time dispatch rate. A 100.0% on-time dispatch rate indicates that the supplier has successfully met platform-recorded dispatch timelines for the relevant measured period. For buyers sourcing second-hand clothing bales, delivery reliability is important because shipment timing directly affects inventory planning, resale cycles, and downstream customer commitments.

The data does not provide further details such as average lead time, shipping methods, export documentation capability, container loading frequency, or historical delay cases. Therefore, the delivery score is based strictly on the stated on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring rule, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% falls into the 9–10 point range. Since the supplier has a stated 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, it qualifies for the maximum score in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Reviews: 80+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Present as platform tag
  • Factory / supplier verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier shows a favorable quality and feedback profile. A 4.7 store rating indicates generally positive customer satisfaction. The 80+ reviews provide a moderate level of feedback validation, sufficient to support a quality assessment but not large enough to remove all uncertainty. The Finished Product Inspection tag is an important quality control indicator, especially for second-hand clothing where grading, sorting, condition consistency, and packaging accuracy are important procurement considerations.

The verified supplier/factory status further supports the supplier’s reliability. However, the dataset does not include detailed inspection standards, defect rate, grading criteria, return rate, complaint rate, or third-party audit reports. As a result, the supplier appears to have a credible basic quality assurance structure, but deeper quality control capability cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a high score due to its 4.7 rating, meaningful review base, Finished Product Inspection tag, and verified status. The score is not perfect because the review volume is moderate rather than extensive, and detailed quality control metrics are not provided.

Final Score

18 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 17 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 18 / 20
Total Score 89 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for bulk procurement of second-hand clothing and thrift clothing bales.

Guangzhou Gracer Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking relatively stable supply, platform-protected transactions, and low-MOQ access to second-hand apparel products. The supplier is particularly appropriate for wholesalers, thrift store operators, resale businesses, and buyers testing mixed second-hand clothing bale categories.

Key advantages include:
- 23,000+㎡ facility and 200+ staff
- 8-year Gold Supplier history
- Trade Assurance support
- CN¥12.8M+ transaction value in the past six months
- 100.0% on-time dispatch rate
- 4.7 store rating and 80+ reviews
- Finished Product Inspection tag

Main risks:
- Full Customization capability is Insufficient Data
- Detailed production or processing capacity is Insufficient Data
- Independent third-party certifications are Insufficient Data
- Quality grading standards, defect rates, and return rates are Insufficient Data

Growth potential:
The supplier has strong platform credibility, solid recent transaction performance, and reliable delivery data. If it can provide clearer documentation on product grading standards, inspection procedures, export experience, and customization capability, it could become a stronger long-term sourcing partner for larger or more quality-sensitive buyers.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Riching Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Riching Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Guangying Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Guangying Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Yijiayuan Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Yijiayuan Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zagumi Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zagumi Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Lvdong Xinqiu Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Lvdong Xinqiu Renewable Resources Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinxiang Huayin Renewable Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xinxiang Huayin Renewable Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hissen Resources Recycling Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Hissen Resources Recycling Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Huanhua Resources Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Huanhua Resources Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai National Resources & Jingjie Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai National Resources & Jingjie Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunnymed Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunnymed Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lailina Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lailina Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Skydance Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Skydance Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kekele Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Kekele Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Focuslaser Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Focuslaser Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Artgift Trading Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Artgift Trading Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Environstar Enterprise Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Environstar Enterprise Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongzhuo Technology Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongzhuo Technology Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mecan Medical Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mecan Medical Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sonca Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sonca Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Jiaozuo Jiefan Leather Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiaozuo Jiefan Leather Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Guose Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Guose Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongying Sunstar Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongying Sunstar Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jichuan Chemical Additives Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jichuan Chemical Additives Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Pfm Screen Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Pfm Screen Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jingxin Photoelectric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Jingxin Photoelectric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Firstrich Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Firstrich Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhongsheng Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhongsheng Sanitary Ware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Tyco Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Tyco Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuchuan Zhongtai Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuchuan Zhongtai Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Zhengfei Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Zhengfei Mould Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kangbeier Innovation (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kangbeier Innovation (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Shield Office Furniture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Shield Office Furniture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yasidan Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yasidan Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Qinglin Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Qinglin Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Morsun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Morsun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Tianyun Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Tianyun Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Dingfeng Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Dingfeng Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hica Vehicles (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hica Vehicles (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Baolun Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Baolun Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026