zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Hangzhou Health Shining Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Hangzhou Health Shining Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering medical and health-related electronic products such as handheld pulse oximeter sensors, fetal dopplers, sound amplifiers, clinical thermometers, and related devices. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale but commercially active supplier, with a factory area of over 1,300㎡ and more than 20 staff. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and supplier verification status. Commercial performance is solid, with 400+ orders and CN¥4.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.8 store rating and 100+ reviews. However, customization capability, finished product inspection, and specific product or medical certifications are not provided. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-to-mid MOQ sourcing with platform-backed transaction security, but further due diligence is required for regulated medical-device procurement.

Hangzhou Health Shining Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Zhejiang, China
  • Factory area: 1,300+㎡
  • Employees: 20+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory verification status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical production base with a reported factory area of more than 1,300㎡ and over 20 employees. This indicates an established but relatively small-scale manufacturing operation. The verified supplier status provides some credibility regarding the existence and basic legitimacy of the supplier’s operational setup. However, the provided data does not indicate large-scale production lines, high employee count, advanced manufacturing equipment, annual output, or internationally recognized factory management certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and has passed a supplier verification process, which supports operational reliability at a foundational level. However, the factory size and workforce suggest a small production scale rather than a large or medium-sized industrial manufacturer. Because production capacity details and factory certification information are limited, the supplier should not be scored in the medium or large-scale category.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / platform labels provided: “On-time delivery 93.0%”, “Response time ≤4h”
  • Product-specific or industry certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform history, with 9 years as a Gold Supplier and support for Trade Assurance. These factors improve buyer protection and platform-level credibility. The verified supplier status further strengthens trust in the supplier’s business presence. However, the certification labels provided are mainly operational performance indicators, not product compliance certificates or industry-specific approvals. No explicit medical product certifications, quality management certificates, or regulatory approvals are included in the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale

A 9-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verification status form a strong platform credibility profile. These are important for reducing transaction risk, especially for international buyers sourcing through . However, because industry compliance certifications are not specified, the supplier cannot be considered fully comprehensive from a regulatory compliance perspective.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 400+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥4.2M+
  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent transaction activity. More than 400 orders within six months indicates consistent buyer engagement, while CN¥4.2M+ in transaction value reflects meaningful commercial volume. A store rating of 4.8 with over 100 reviews suggests generally positive market feedback and a reasonable base of customer validation.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of high order volume, substantial transaction value, strong rating, and review count supports a high score in business performance. The supplier has clear commercial traction and is not merely a low-activity storefront. However, the data does not provide repeat-buyer ratio, export market distribution, or major customer references, so a perfect score is not justified.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤4h
  • Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
  • Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication speed for platform-based sourcing. This is positive for buyers who require quotation follow-up, order clarification, and basic pre-sales communication. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM/ODM services, private labeling, packaging customization, or technical customization.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is good, but not at the highest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot be rated as having strong service flexibility. The score reflects normal communication responsiveness but limited evidence of advanced service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 93.0%

Elaboration

A 93.0% on-time delivery rate indicates relatively reliable fulfillment performance. This exceeds the 90% threshold and suggests the supplier is generally capable of meeting agreed shipment schedules. For buyers managing inventory or time-sensitive replenishment, this is a positive indicator.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, suppliers with on-time delivery above 90% fall into the 9–10 point range. While 93.0% is strong, it is not perfect, and no additional delivery metrics such as average lead time, delayed order reasons, or logistics capabilities are provided. Therefore, a strong but not maximum score is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Reviews: 100+
  • Verified supplier / factory verification: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Detailed quality control certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a favorable customer feedback profile, with a 4.8 rating and more than 100 reviews. This indicates that previous buyers generally had positive purchasing experiences. The verified supplier status also provides some assurance regarding basic supplier legitimacy. However, the provided information does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, formal QC procedures, inspection reports, product testing standards, or medical-device compliance documentation.

Scoring Rationale

The rating and review count support a good quality and feedback score. However, because finished product inspection and detailed quality assurance systems are not confirmed, the supplier cannot be rated in the highest quality tier. This is especially important because several listed products appear to be health or medical-related devices, where quality documentation and compliance evidence are critical for procurement decisions.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended

Hangzhou Health Shining Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking a platform-verified supplier with strong transaction history, Trade Assurance protection, good recent order volume, and reliable on-time delivery performance. The supplier appears suitable for small to medium-volume procurement, sample orders, and buyers requiring relatively low MOQ options.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers sourcing through with Trade Assurance preference
- Small and medium distributors requiring low MOQ procurement
- Buyers looking for medical or health-related electronic products listed in the provided data
- Procurement teams that can conduct additional compliance checks before bulk purchasing

Main risks:
- Small factory scale with only 1,300+㎡ and 20+ staff
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Product-specific medical certifications or regulatory approvals: Insufficient Data
- Limited visibility into production capacity, QC process, and export compliance documentation

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong platform maturity, active recent sales, and good buyer feedback. If it can provide clearer quality inspection evidence, product compliance documentation, and customization capability, it could become a stronger candidate for higher-value or longer-term procurement cooperation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Qingdao Shining Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Shining Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Ganxin Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Ganxin Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Befitter Machinery & Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Befitter Machinery & Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hongfeng Electronic Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Hongfeng Electronic Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aoj Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aoj Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fittop Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fittop Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jizhi Health Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jizhi Health Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kelrosa Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kelrosa Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Nanolattix Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Nanolattix Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nihewan Health Technology (Yangyuan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nihewan Health Technology (Yangyuan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Vital Green Health Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Vital Green Health Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Province Lu E Niang Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Province Lu E Niang Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Health & Health (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Health & Health (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beyond Health Tech Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beyond Health Tech Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Mt Health Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Mt Health Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grin (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grin (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiuzhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Benhao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Yongkeng Electric & Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Yongkeng Electric & Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Tianyan Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tianyan Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Star Glass & Packing Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Star Glass & Packing Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kci (Henan) Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Kci (Henan) Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shenguang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shenguang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Dais Hardware Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Dais Hardware Products Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Changle Xinhongyuan Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Changle Xinhongyuan Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sansd(Jiangsu) Environmental Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Sansd(Jiangsu) Environmental Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Eraclean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Eraclean Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Focused Smartech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Focused Smartech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jiayue Sanitary Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Jiayue Sanitary Products Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Dingjin Packaging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Metal (Zhengzhou) Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Metal (Zhengzhou) Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Langtu Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Bochuang Seal Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Bochuang Seal Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hopestar Sci-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hopestar Sci-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chunwang Import&Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chunwang Import&Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yatemei Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yatemei Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chang Zhou Ncyclebike Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chang Zhou Ncyclebike Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yiruida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yiruida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Dabo Jin Integrated Housing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Dabo Jin Integrated Housing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026