Huangshan Benma Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Huangshan Benma Group Co., Ltd. is a China-based motorcycle and motorbike spare parts supplier located in Anhui, with a reported factory area of 26,000+㎡ and 290+ staff. The company shows relatively solid manufacturing capacity and has been identified as a verified supplier. Its product listings cover motorcycle tail parts, crankshaft connecting rods, brake parts, engine parts, and spare parts, with MOQs ranging from 50 sets to 500 sets or 100–300 pieces depending on item type. On , the supplier has 15 years of Gold Supplier status, supports Trade Assurance, and displays service tags including warranty availability, ODM service, full customization, and minor customization. However, recent commercial validation is moderate to limited, with 7 orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, plus a 4.6 store rating based on 10+ reviews. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking verified motorcycle parts sourcing with customization capability, but larger buyers should further validate quality systems and production consistency before scaling procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company: Huangshan Benma Group Co., Ltd.
• Country: China
• Province: Anhui
• Factory area: 26,000+㎡
• Employees: 290+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a relatively substantial physical manufacturing base, with more than 26,000㎡ of factory space and over 290 employees. This indicates that the company is not a small trading-only operation based on the provided information, but rather appears to have meaningful production infrastructure. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its operational presence.

The company’s product listings also cover multiple motorcycle spare parts categories, including engine parts, brake parts, connecting rods, and general spare parts. This suggests a broader motorcycle parts supply capability within the data provided. However, no specific production line count, annual capacity, machinery list, export volume, or factory audit report details are provided, so the assessment cannot be elevated to the highest tier.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a medium-to-large factory footprint and a sizeable workforce, which supports stable production capability. The verified supplier status is a positive indicator. However, because the data does not include detailed production capacity, equipment, formal factory certification names, or audit scope, it is not appropriate to classify the company as a fully large-scale, highly transparent supply chain at the 18–20 level. It fits best in the upper range of a medium stable factory.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 15 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Warranty available
• ODM service available
• Full customization
• Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform history, with 15 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a significant credibility indicator within the platform environment. The availability of Trade Assurance also provides buyers with a transactional protection mechanism, which improves procurement confidence.

The supplier also displays several platform service and capability tags, including warranty availability, ODM service, full customization, and minor customization. These tags suggest that the supplier is positioned to serve both standard product procurement and customized product requirements. However, the provided data does not include third-party management system certifications, product compliance certificates, or specific industry-standard certifications.

Scoring Rationale

A 15-year Gold Supplier history combined with Trade Assurance and multiple service tags represents a strong platform credibility profile. The long platform tenure is a major advantage compared with newer suppliers. The only reason this dimension does not receive a perfect score is the absence of detailed external compliance certifications or named factory audit documentation beyond the verified supplier indication.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 7
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Review count: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded 7 orders over the past six months, with a transaction value of CN¥135.2K+. This indicates active business on the platform, but the order volume is not high. The transaction value suggests that some orders may be of moderate value, but the available data does not provide order size distribution, repeat customer ratio, buyer geography, or category-level sales breakdown.

The store rating of 4.6 is acceptable and generally positive, but the review base of 10+ is limited. A low review count reduces the statistical confidence of the rating. Therefore, the business performance is validated but not strongly proven at a high-volume level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has measurable recent transaction activity and a positive store rating, which supports basic business credibility. However, 7 orders in six months and 10+ reviews are relatively limited indicators for large-scale procurement validation. The transaction amount of CN¥135.2K+ is moderate but not enough to demonstrate high marketplace traction. This places the supplier in the lower-to-mid business performance range.

Final Score

12 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤7h
• Full customization: Available
• Minor customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier supports full customization, minor customization, and ODM service according to the provided platform tags. This is a positive factor for buyers who require product adaptation, branding, specification changes, or development support. The response time of ≤7 hours is acceptable for normal international B2B communication, though it is not at the fastest level.

No additional data is provided regarding quotation speed, engineering support, sample lead time, multilingual service, or dedicated account management. Therefore, the service capability can be considered functional and customization-oriented, but not fully verified as premium-level service.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates strong customization availability, which improves its service capability score. However, the response time is not within the ≤1 hour benchmark required for the highest 9–10 point range. Since communication is still within a reasonable same-day window and customization capabilities are clearly listed, the supplier fits the 6–8 point service range, positioned at the higher end.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. Based on the scoring rule, any supplier with an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. This is a strong delivery indicator and suggests reliable dispatch performance within the measured platform data.

However, the data does not provide the number of shipments included in the calculation, delivery lead times, logistics destinations, or late shipment dispute history. Therefore, while the metric is excellent, procurement teams should still verify delivery performance during sample or trial orders.

Scoring Rationale

A 100.0% on-time dispatch rate meets the highest delivery performance standard. Even though the shipment sample size is not provided, the available data directly supports a top-tier score under the defined scoring rules.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Review count: 10+
• Verified supplier: True
• Warranty available: Listed
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.6 store rating, which is generally positive. The availability of a warranty tag is also a useful customer assurance indicator. Verified supplier status supports the existence and credibility of the supplier’s operations. However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the strength of customer feedback evidence.

There is no provided confirmation of Finished Product Inspection, product testing process, defect rate, quality management certification, inspection report availability, or customer complaint data. Therefore, while the supplier has some quality assurance signals, the quality system cannot be considered fully transparent based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a solid score due to its positive rating, verified supplier status, and warranty availability. However, the relatively small number of reviews and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection prevent a high-tier quality score. The data supports a rating in the “good but not fully validated” range rather than the 18–20 point level.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Huangshan Benma Group Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing motorcycle spare parts who value an established supplier profile, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance, and customization capability. The company appears particularly relevant for small to medium-sized importers, aftermarket motorcycle parts distributors, and buyers seeking ODM or customized spare parts within the listed product categories.

The main strengths are its 15-year Gold Supplier history, 26,000+㎡ factory area, 290+ staff, 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, and available customization services. These indicators support supplier stability and operational capability.

Key risks include limited recent order volume, only 10+ reviews, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, formal quality certifications, production capacity, and detailed audit results. For larger-volume buyers, it is recommended to conduct sample testing, request inspection documentation, verify factory audit details, and confirm quality control procedures before placing bulk orders.

Overall, the supplier has good growth potential and a credible platform foundation, but procurement scaling should be based on further quality and production validation.