Jiangsu Lai Shi Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jiangsu Lai Shi Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, offering evaporative air cooling and air-conditioning related products with low minimum order quantities of 1 set or 1 piece across the listed items. The supplier shows a moderate production foundation, supported by a reported factory area of 10,000+ sqm, 30+ staff, and audited supplier status. On , it has 5 years as a Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and displays operational tags including response time within 2 hours and 100.0% on-time delivery. However, its recent commercial performance is limited, with only 1 order in the past six months, CN¥67.6K+ transaction value, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing, trial procurement, or project-based evaporative cooling equipment, but larger buyers should conduct additional verification before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Jiangsu, China
- Factory area: 10,000+ sqm
- Staff size: 30+ staff
- Audited supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a reported production site of over 10,000 sqm, which indicates a meaningful physical operating base. However, the staff count of 30+ suggests a relatively lean workforce compared with larger-scale manufacturing operations. The audited supplier status improves confidence that the company has undergone some form of supplier verification, although no further details are provided regarding production lines, annual capacity, equipment, or specific factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The company appears to have a stable basic manufacturing foundation, especially due to the factory area and audited supplier status. However, the limited employee scale prevents it from being classified as a large-scale supply chain manufacturer. Since production capacity details are not available, the assessment should remain moderate rather than high.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Audited supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a 5-year Gold Supplier record on , which provides a reasonable platform history. Trade Assurance support adds transactional protection for buyers. The presence of audited supplier status further strengthens credibility. However, the provided certification or industry labels are operational performance tags rather than product certifications or formal management system certifications. No ISO, CE, RoHS, or other product/industry certifications are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has several important platform trust elements: Gold Supplier status, 5 years of platform history, Trade Assurance, and audited supplier verification. This supports a relatively strong credibility score. However, the lack of detailed certification labels or formal compliance documentation limits the score from reaching the top tier.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 1
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded only 1 order over the past six months, with a transaction amount of CN¥67.6K+. While this shows that platform-based transactions have occurred, the order volume is very low. The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews significantly reduce the level of commercial validation available to procurement teams.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates limited recent transaction activity. The transaction amount is not negligible, but it is supported by only one order, making it difficult to assess repeat buyer confidence or stable market demand. The missing store rating and lack of customer reviews create a clear validation gap.

Final Score
9 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency: Response time ≤2h tag available

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication speed for initial buyer inquiries. This is useful for procurement teams requiring timely quotation, technical discussion, or order coordination. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, or engineering customization.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is positive, but it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. More importantly, customization capability is not provided, so the supplier cannot be rated as having strong service capability. The score reflects acceptable communication responsiveness with incomplete evidence on customization.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. This is a strong delivery indicator within the available dataset. However, the order base appears limited because only 1 order was recorded in the past six months, so the delivery performance should be interpreted carefully.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the stated on-time delivery rate, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance band. The limited recent order count does not change the reported percentage, but it does reduce the depth of evidence behind the metric.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory / supplier verification: Audited supplier = True

Elaboration
The supplier has audited supplier status, which provides some quality-related credibility at the factory or supplier verification level. However, there is no available store rating, no customer reviews, and no data confirming Finished Product Inspection. As a result, buyer-side feedback and product quality validation are both limited in the provided dataset.

Scoring Rationale
The audited supplier status supports a basic level of trust, but the lack of customer reviews and missing store rating are significant weaknesses. Since there is no evidence of Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality assurance certification, the supplier cannot be considered strongly validated from a quality feedback perspective.

Final Score
9 / 20

Total Score

66 / 100

Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 14 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 17 / 20
- Business Performance: 9 / 20
- Service Capability: 7 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 9 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for low-risk trial orders, sample orders, or small-to-medium project procurement where low MOQ and platform transaction protection are important. The supplier is most suitable for buyers sourcing evaporative air cooling or air-conditioning related equipment in small quantities, especially where Trade Assurance can be used to control transaction risk.

The main risks are limited recent order volume, 0 customer reviews, missing store rating, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, customization capability, formal product certifications, and detailed production capacity. These gaps make the supplier less suitable for immediate large-volume or long-term strategic sourcing without further verification.

Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s 10,000+ sqm factory area, audited supplier status, 5-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and reported 100.0% on-time delivery. Before scaling cooperation, buyers should request product certificates, inspection procedures, production capacity details, reference orders, and pre-shipment inspection arrangements.