zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Leanon Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Leanon Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 26,000+ m² and 120+ staff. The company appears to have a moderate production foundation for lubricant-related products, including hydraulic oil and lubricating grease, and is listed as a verified supplier. On , it holds Gold Supplier status for 2 years and supports Trade Assurance, which provides a basic level of platform credibility. However, its commercial track record is still limited, with only 2 orders and CN¥20.2K+ transaction value in the past six months. The store rating is 5.0, but this is based on only 2 reviews, so customer feedback is not yet statistically strong. Delivery performance is a key concern, as the reported on-time delivery rate is 0.0%. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking trial orders or small-to-medium procurement of lubricant products, but larger-volume cooperation should require further verification.

Leanon Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Jiangsu, China
- Factory area: 26,000+ m²
- Employee count: 120+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier reports a factory scale of over 26,000 m² and more than 120 employees, which indicates a meaningful physical production base rather than a very small trading operation. The listed product range is focused on lubricant-related items such as hydraulic oil and lubricating grease, suggesting a relatively defined product category. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of a basic operational foundation.

Scoring Rationale
The company has a solid mid-sized factory footprint and employee base, which supports stable production capability. However, the data does not provide evidence of larger-scale industrial output, advanced production lines, annual capacity, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, it fits best into the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale supply chain category.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 0.0%”
- Other certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has core platform credibility elements, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are positive signals for platform-based procurement because they provide a degree of transactional protection and supplier identity validation. However, the Gold Supplier history is relatively short at 2 years, and the available certification or industry labels are limited.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets several important platform credibility requirements, but the short Gold Supplier duration and lack of detailed certification data prevent a higher score. The “On-time delivery 0.0%” tag also weakens the overall compliance and reliability profile from a procurement risk perspective.

Final Score
15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 2
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥20.2K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration
The store rating is excellent at 5.0, but the commercial base behind this rating is very small. Only 2 orders and 2 reviews are recorded in the past six months, with transaction value of CN¥20.2K+. This suggests that the supplier has some confirmed platform transactions, but not enough volume to demonstrate strong market validation or consistent repeat purchasing behavior.

Scoring Rationale
The high rating is positive, but the low number of orders, limited review count, and modest transaction value significantly reduce confidence in business performance. The supplier demonstrates initial commercial activity but not yet stable or high-volume marketplace performance.

Final Score
11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response time: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
A response time of ≤4 hours indicates acceptable communication responsiveness for standard supplier inquiries. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM/ODM service, packaging customization, formulation adjustment, or other buyer-specific service capabilities.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is reasonable but does not reach the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot be rated as having strong service capability. The score reflects acceptable basic responsiveness with insufficient evidence of advanced service support.

Final Score
6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 0.0%

Elaboration
The reported on-time delivery rate is 0.0%, which is a major concern for procurement planning. Delivery reliability is especially important for industrial consumables such as lubricants, where delayed replenishment can affect maintenance schedules and operational continuity.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate below 70% should receive fewer than 5 points. Since the reported rate is 0.0%, the supplier receives a very low delivery score. This does not necessarily explain the reason for poor delivery performance, but based strictly on the available data, it represents a significant operational risk.

Final Score
2 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 2
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the rating is based on only 2 reviews. This limits the reliability of the feedback as a quality indicator. Verified supplier status provides some basic reassurance, but the data does not confirm the existence of Finished Product Inspection, detailed quality control processes, third-party product testing, or factory verification documentation.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier receives credit for its 5.0 rating and verified status, but the very small review base and lack of confirmed quality inspection systems prevent a higher score. The quality profile is promising but not sufficiently proven for risk-sensitive or high-volume procurement.

Final Score
11 / 20

Total Score

61 / 100

Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 16 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 15 / 20
- Business Performance: 11 / 20
- Service Capability: 6 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 2 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 11 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Leanon Petroleum Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for cautious, conditional cooperation rather than immediate large-scale procurement. The supplier has a credible mid-sized factory base, verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership, and Trade Assurance support. These factors make it suitable for trial orders, small-to-medium lubricant procurement, or buyers who can conduct additional supplier qualification before scaling volume.

The main risks are weak delivery performance, limited recent transaction volume, only 2 customer reviews, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and detailed factory quality systems. The 0.0% on-time delivery rate should be clarified before any production-critical purchase.

Growth potential exists due to the supplier’s factory size, employee base, and focused lubricant product offering. However, larger buyers should request delivery records, quality inspection documents, product specifications, and sample testing before entering long-term or high-volume cooperation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shandong Kehuan Petroleum Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Kehuan Petroleum Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kaer Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Kaer Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Skycut Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Skycut Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topjet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topjet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Alwaycare Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Alwaycare Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lumina Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lumina Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen F&Q Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen F&Q Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nextshapes Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nextshapes Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topfast Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topfast Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengyi Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hengyi Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ancreu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ancreu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Urovo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Urovo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pherobio Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pherobio Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengko Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengko Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Levinko Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Levinko Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Winstars Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Winstars Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Fullcolor Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Fullcolor Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Fortune Technology Group Supplier Evaluation
Fortune Technology Group Supplier Evaluation
Youli Electric And Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Youli Electric And Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Hygea Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hygea Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Pengsheng Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Pengsheng Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinofarm Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinofarm Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huaao Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Huaao Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Mingko Industry Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Mingko Industry Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Longcheng Sealing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Longcheng Sealing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Winnerjet Printer Consumables Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Winnerjet Printer Consumables Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Liangyun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Liangyun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Caidu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Caidu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Dynavolt Intelligent Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Dynavolt Intelligent Vehicle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Sunkey Paper&Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Sunkey Paper&Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Winsense Auto Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Winsense Auto Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Junzhu Shoe Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Junzhu Shoe Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhongbo Ruike Precision Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Zhongbo Ruike Precision Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foodchem International Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Foodchem International Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Sanki Textile Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Sanki Textile Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Vit Sci & Tec Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Vit Sci & Tec Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Speedy Cnc Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Speedy Cnc Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Shuoyuan Agricultural Water Conservation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Shuoyuan Agricultural Water Conservation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026