Li County Qidian Rope Belt Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Li County Qidian Rope Belt Manufacturing Co., Ltd. is a China-based rope and belt manufacturer located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of over 2,000 m² and more than 20 staff. The supplier’s listed products focus on bungee cords, elastic latex luggage rope, bungee cord loops, and related rope products, indicating a specialized but relatively compact manufacturing operation. On , the company shows a solid platform credibility profile, including 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Business activity is moderate, with 60+ orders and CN¥608.5K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating of 4.6 suggests generally positive buyer feedback, though the review count of 10+ remains limited. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking mid-volume rope or bungee cord sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection, but larger enterprise buyers should further verify production capacity, quality inspection processes, and customization capabilities before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Hebei, China
- Factory area: 2,000+ m²
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined factory footprint and a small-to-medium workforce. A 2,000+ m² facility and 20+ employees indicate basic in-house production capability, but the scale is not large compared with more established industrial manufacturers. The verified supplier status provides some degree of confidence that the company has undergone platform-level supplier verification.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates real manufacturing presence and basic operational stability, supported by factory area, staff count, and verified supplier status. However, the available data does not show large-scale production capacity, advanced factory certifications, or extensive workforce depth. Therefore, it fits best into the category of a smaller factory with basic production capability rather than a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 82.4%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively strong platform profile. Seven years as a Gold Supplier indicates sustained platform presence, while Trade Assurance improves transaction protection for buyers. Verified supplier status further strengthens credibility. However, the provided certification labels mainly relate to response time and delivery performance, not formal product, factory, or management-system certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core platform credibility indicators: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. These are meaningful trust signals for procurement screening. The score is not higher because the data does not include detailed compliance certifications, product certifications, or a broader certification label set.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 60+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥608.5K+
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 10+

Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated recent transaction activity, with more than 60 orders and over CN¥608.5K in sales during the past six months. This suggests the supplier is commercially active and has buyer demand. The 4.6 store rating is positive, but the limited review count means the feedback base is still relatively small.

Scoring Rationale
The order volume and transaction value support a stable medium-level business performance assessment. However, the supplier does not show very high order volume, very high transaction scale, or a large review base. The business validation is credible but not yet strong enough to qualify as a high-performance supplier.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within three hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for routine inquiries. This is helpful for quotation, sampling, and order coordination. However, there is no provided evidence confirming Full Customization capability, engineering support, private-label service, or customized packaging support.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is reasonable and supports a positive service assessment. However, because customization capability is not confirmed in the provided data, the supplier cannot be rated as having strong service capability. The score reflects normal responsiveness with insufficient evidence of advanced customization support.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 82.4%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is within the 80–89% range. This indicates acceptable but not excellent delivery reliability. Buyers with flexible timelines may find this manageable, while buyers with strict delivery windows should monitor shipment schedules carefully.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 82.4%, the supplier is in the lower-middle part of this band. The performance is adequate but leaves room for improvement.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 10+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The 4.6 store rating suggests generally favorable buyer satisfaction. However, the review count of 10+ is limited, which reduces the statistical reliability of the feedback profile. The supplier has verified status, but the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection or detailed factory verification coverage.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a positive rating and some platform-backed credibility, but quality assurance evidence is incomplete. The absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection data limits confidence in systematic quality control. The score reflects good but not fully validated quality performance.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

73 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Li County Qidian Rope Belt Manufacturing Co., Ltd. is recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing bungee cords, elastic rope, luggage rope, and related rope products at small-to-medium order volumes. The supplier is suitable for buyers who value platform protection, moderate recent transaction activity, and acceptable response speed.

Key risks include limited factory scale, incomplete quality inspection data, limited review volume, and only moderate on-time delivery performance at 82.4%. The supplier’s growth potential lies in its 7-year Gold Supplier history, verified status, and active recent transaction record. Before placing large or time-sensitive orders, buyers should request samples, confirm inspection procedures, clarify customization capability, and agree on delivery control terms.