Nantong Weston Glove Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Nantong Weston Glove Co., Ltd. is a China-based glove supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of over 3,100 sqm and more than 100 staff. The company appears to operate as a mid-sized manufacturing supplier with verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 4 years, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Warranty Available. Its product range in the provided data focuses on protective gloves and related safety products, including cut-resistant gloves, PU-coated gloves, finger protectors, and anti-fire sleeves. Commercially, the supplier shows active recent performance, with 300+ orders and CN¥473.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating and 100+ reviews. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking cost-sensitive protective glove products, small-to-medium trial orders, and suppliers with basic customization and platform-backed transaction protection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Jiangsu, China
- Factory area: 3,100+ sqm
- Employees: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical manufacturing base with over 3,100 sqm of factory space and more than 100 employees. This indicates a moderate production setup rather than a very large-scale industrial operation. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic operational condition of the company. However, the provided data does not include details such as production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, export volume, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indicator.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates stable mid-sized manufacturing capability. The factory size and workforce are sufficient for regular glove production and commercial order fulfillment, but the scale is not large enough to classify it as a top-tier large supply chain operation. Because verified supplier status is present, the company should not be scored as weak or insufficient, but the lack of detailed production capacity data prevents a higher score.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / platform labels: Warranty Available, Finished Product Inspection, ODM Service Available, Full Customization

Elaboration
The supplier has a 4-year Gold Supplier history, which provides a moderate platform track record. Trade Assurance support improves transaction security for buyers. The verified supplier status and listed platform capability labels further strengthen credibility. Finished Product Inspection and Warranty Available are positive indicators for platform-level quality and after-sales assurance. However, the data does not mention independent international certifications, product compliance certificates, or third-party factory audit standards.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core credibility elements expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and relevant service/inspection labels. The 4-year supplier duration is credible but not long enough to be considered long-established at the highest level. Missing external certification details also limit the score from reaching the top band.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 300+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥473.2K+
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 100+

Elaboration
The supplier has clear recent transaction activity, with more than 300 orders over the past six months. This suggests consistent buyer engagement and active platform operation. The transaction value of CN¥473.2K+ shows meaningful sales volume, though it is not enough by itself to indicate very large-scale commercial dominance. The 4.6 store rating is generally positive, and 100+ reviews provide a reasonable feedback base.

Scoring Rationale
The business performance is stable and commercially validated. Order count is strong, while transaction value is moderate. The rating is good but not exceptionally high, and the review base is useful but not very large. Overall, the supplier fits the profile of a proven mid-level performer with active sales, rather than a top-volume market leader.

Final Score
17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Listed
- ODM Service Available: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier reports a communication response time of within 2 hours, which is acceptable for cross-border sourcing communication. Full Customization and ODM Service Available indicate that the supplier can support customized product requirements to some extent. However, the data does not provide details on design support, sampling speed, customization MOQ, packaging customization, engineering resources, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has good service capability based on the response time and customization labels. Since the response time is within 2 hours but not confirmed as within 1 hour, it does not qualify for the highest service score band. The presence of Full Customization and ODM support justifies a strong score, while missing details on customization execution prevent a maximum rating.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 90.3%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 90.3%, which is above the 90% benchmark. This indicates a generally reliable delivery record on the platform. For procurement purposes, this level suggests that the supplier is capable of meeting scheduled shipment expectations in most cases. However, the data does not include average lead time, production cycle, peak-season performance, or late shipment reasons.

Scoring Rationale
Based on the defined scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% falls within the 9–10 point range. Since the rate is only slightly above 90%, it deserves a strong but not perfect score. Additional delivery history would be required to justify the maximum score.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 100+
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty Available: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.6 store rating and more than 100 reviews, showing that buyers have provided a meaningful amount of feedback. Finished Product Inspection is a positive quality-control indicator, and the verified supplier status supports baseline credibility. Warranty Available also suggests some level of after-sales support. However, the data does not include defect rates, inspection pass rates, product test reports, safety certifications, or detailed customer complaint information.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows a good quality feedback profile, supported by positive ratings, a moderate number of reviews, and platform-level inspection indicators. The score is not higher because the review count is not extensive and no detailed technical quality certifications or product compliance documents are provided. The available evidence supports a reliable but not risk-free quality assessment.

Final Score
17 / 20

Total Score

84 / 100

• Company Strength: 16 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 17 / 20
• Business Performance: 17 / 20
• Service Capability: 8 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 17 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended for buyers seeking protective gloves and related safety products from a mid-sized verified Chinese supplier with active performance. Nantong Weston Glove Co., Ltd. is especially suitable for small-to-medium procurement orders, trial purchases, cost-sensitive sourcing, and buyers requiring basic customization or ODM support.

The main strengths are verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 4 years of Gold Supplier history, 300+ recent orders, 90.3% on-time delivery, and platform labels such as Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization. These factors make the supplier commercially credible and suitable for controlled procurement engagement.

Key risks include insufficient data on production capacity, international product certifications, detailed factory audit results, defect rates, and compliance documentation. Buyers should request product test reports, sample inspection, customization confirmation, and written delivery terms before placing larger orders.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential as a stable mid-sized manufacturer with active transaction performance and acceptable quality/service indicators, but large-volume or compliance-sensitive buyers should conduct additional verification before scaling procurement.