Pujiang Chenjie Crystal Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Pujiang Chenjie Crystal Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 3,600+㎡ and 20+ staff. The supplier appears to operate as a small-to-medium scale manufacturer with verified supplier status and platform credibility, including 6 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. Its product listings indicate focus on small perfume/attar-related packaging or decorative craft items, with MOQ levels ranging from 120 to 1,000 pieces and unit prices spanning CN¥1.83 to CN¥17.52. Business activity is moderate, supported by 50+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.7 store rating and 30+ reviews. However, delivery performance is a clear weakness, with an on-time delivery rate of only 61.5%. Quality assurance information is partially available through verified supplier status, but Finished Product Inspection data is not provided. This supplier may suit buyers seeking low-to-mid volume customized sourcing, provided delivery risks are managed carefully.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 3,600+㎡
• Staff size: 20+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a documented physical production base with a factory area exceeding 3,600㎡ and more than 20 employees. This indicates it has an established operating site and basic manufacturing capacity rather than functioning only as a trading storefront. The verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of the company’s physical and operational presence. However, the staff size suggests a relatively lean organization, and the available data does not indicate large-scale production lines, advanced automation, or high-volume manufacturing infrastructure.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates stable basic manufacturing capability, supported by a measurable factory area and verified supplier status. However, with only 20+ staff, it does not reach the profile of a large-scale supply chain partner. The scale is more consistent with a small-to-medium factory that can support regular orders but may have limitations for complex, urgent, or very high-volume procurement programs.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry tags: Low MOQ for customization, Response time ≤4h, On-time delivery 61.5%
• Verified supplier status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively solid platform profile, including 6 years of Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. These are meaningful credibility indicators for buyers using as a sourcing channel. The verified supplier status further supports platform trustworthiness. The available tags also indicate low MOQ customization and stated response capability, although the on-time delivery tag reveals a weak operational metric.

Scoring Rationale

A 6-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status form a credible platform compliance foundation. However, the certification profile is not fully comprehensive because no additional third-party product certifications, factory management certifications, or inspection-related compliance labels are provided. The low delivery rate also weakens the overall compliance confidence from a procurement risk perspective.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 50+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
• Store rating: 4.7
• Reviews: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded commercial activity over the past six months, with more than 50 orders and transaction value exceeding CN¥202.8K. This indicates real buyer engagement and some degree of market validation. The store rating of 4.7 is positive, while 30+ reviews provide a limited but useful base of customer feedback. The business performance is active but not at a high-volume level based on the provided order and transaction data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows moderate commercial traction rather than weak or unverified sales activity. The order count and transaction value support a stable operating profile, but they do not indicate high-volume or high-value transaction leadership. The 4.7 rating is favorable, although the review count remains relatively modest, limiting the depth of market validation.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of ≤4 hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency for standard sourcing inquiries. The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” indicates some level of customization flexibility, especially for buyers seeking smaller customized batches. However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability, design support, private mold development, packaging customization, or engineering assistance.

Scoring Rationale

Service capability appears adequate for routine procurement and basic customization discussions. The response speed is reasonable but does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since Full Customization support is not explicitly confirmed, the score should remain in the middle range rather than being treated as a strong custom manufacturing service provider.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 61.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is the weakest metric in the provided data. At 61.5%, it falls below the 70% threshold, indicating a significant risk for buyers with strict launch schedules, promotional timelines, or inventory replenishment cycles. This delivery performance may require buyers to build in longer lead times, confirm production schedules in writing, and use milestone-based follow-up.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. A 61.5% rate reflects material delivery reliability concerns and directly affects procurement risk. Even though the supplier has reasonable platform credibility and business activity, the delivery score must be low because the provided operational metric is weak.

Final Score

4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.7
• Reviews: 30+
• Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.7, supported by 30+ reviews. This suggests generally favorable customer feedback, although the review volume is not large enough to provide strong statistical confidence. Verified supplier status provides some quality and legitimacy support at the company level. However, there is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, quality management certification, inspection reports, or product-specific compliance certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The rating is good and the supplier has some verification backing, which supports a moderate-to-good quality confidence level. However, the limited number of reviews and absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection prevent a higher score. Quality assurance appears acceptable for general sourcing, but buyers should request samples and inspection arrangements before placing larger orders.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

71 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume sourcing, low MOQ customization, and Trade Assurance-backed transactions. The supplier is most suitable for importers, small brands, e-commerce sellers, and buyers that can tolerate moderate lead-time uncertainty.

Main risks include the low on-time delivery rate of 61.5%, limited staff scale, modest review volume, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or advanced quality systems. Growth potential exists due to its 6-year Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, moderate transaction activity, and customization-related platform tag. For larger or time-sensitive orders, buyers should request pre-production samples, confirm delivery milestones, and consider third-party inspection before shipment.