Shandong Kingliyang Door & Window Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shandong Kingliyang Door & Window Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of over 10,000 m² and more than 50 staff. The available product data indicates a focus on aluminum gates, villa entrance gates, swing gates, sliding gates, and customized security gate products, with low minimum order quantities of 1 square meter. The supplier has Gold Supplier status for 1 year and is marked as a verified supplier, with platform tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full customization, and Minor customization. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and key business validation data such as recent order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer review history is either missing or unavailable, with the review count listed as 0. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking customized gate products at small trial-order quantities, but commercial track record and customer feedback visibility remain limited.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Shandong, China
• Factory area: 10,000+ m²
• Staff size: 50+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area exceeding 10,000 m², which indicates a meaningful physical production base. The workforce size of more than 50 staff suggests the company is not a micro-scale operation and has at least a basic organizational structure to support production and order handling. The verified supplier status also adds credibility to the company’s operational presence.

However, the available data does not provide detailed information on production lines, annual output, machinery, capacity utilization, export volume, or factory audit details. Therefore, while the factory size is relatively solid, the production scale cannot be assessed as fully large-scale based only on the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates characteristics of a medium-sized manufacturing supplier, supported by a 10,000+ m² factory and 50+ staff. The verified supplier status further supports basic operational credibility. However, the staff size is moderate rather than large, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, equipment, and audit depth. This prevents the supplier from being rated as a large-scale, highly stable supply chain operator.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier tenure: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: False
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / platform tags: Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has Gold Supplier status, but the tenure is only 1 year, which indicates a relatively short platform history. The verified supplier status and available platform tags provide some credibility, particularly the Finished Product Inspection and customization-related service labels.

However, the supplier does not support Trade Assurance according to the provided data. This is an important limitation from a procurement risk-control perspective, as Trade Assurance is often used by buyers to reduce payment and delivery risks on . The certification and service tags are useful, but the data does not include internationally recognized management system certifications or detailed factory audit documentation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic platform credibility through Gold Supplier status and verification, but the short 1-year tenure and lack of Trade Assurance reduce the strength of the compliance profile. The presence of inspection and customization tags improves credibility, but the overall platform assurance system is incomplete.

Final Score

13 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: Insufficient Data
• Transaction amount in the past 6 months: Insufficient Data
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The business performance data is weak because key commercial indicators are missing. There is no disclosed order volume, no disclosed transaction amount, and no available store rating. The review count is listed as 0, meaning there is no visible customer feedback record in the provided data.

This makes it difficult to verify whether the supplier has recent transaction activity, stable buyer demand, or proven repeat business. From a procurement perspective, the lack of commercial performance data increases uncertainty, especially for buyers who rely on platform history to assess supplier reliability.

Scoring Rationale

Because order quantity, transaction value, and store rating are unavailable, and the review count is 0, the supplier has limited commercial validation. The company may still have production capability, but the provided data does not demonstrate active or proven business performance on the platform.

Final Score

6 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤16h
• Full customization: Available
• Minor customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier supports Full customization, Minor customization, and ODM service according to the platform tags. This indicates that the supplier can likely handle customized product requirements within the product categories shown in the data. The low MOQ of 1 square meter also suggests flexibility for small trial orders or customized project-based purchasing.

The response time is listed as ≤16 hours. This is acceptable but not highly responsive compared with suppliers that respond within 1 hour. Therefore, while the customization capability appears relatively strong, the communication speed is moderate rather than excellent.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives a solid service score due to the availability of full customization, minor customization, and ODM service. However, the response time of up to 16 hours does not meet the highest service-performance level. The service capability is suitable for buyers who can tolerate normal communication cycles rather than requiring immediate response.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is reported as 100.0%, which is a strong indicator under the provided scoring criteria. This suggests that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has met delivery timelines for recorded transactions or platform-tracked shipments.

However, the data does not include the number of orders behind this delivery rate. Since recent order volume is missing, the statistical reliability of the 100.0% figure cannot be fully evaluated. A perfect rate is positive, but its strength depends on the transaction base, which is not disclosed.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. The reported 100.0% rate supports a full score in this category. The only limitation is that the underlying order sample size is not available.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a Finished Product Inspection tag, which indicates the presence of some product inspection process. The verified supplier status also supports a basic level of supplier credibility. These are positive quality-related indicators.

However, the customer feedback side is weak. There is no available store rating, and the review count is 0. As a result, there is no visible buyer feedback to validate product consistency, complaint handling, packaging quality, or real delivery experience. The available quality assurance indicators are therefore process-based rather than customer-validated.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality assurance support through Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status, but the lack of customer reviews and store rating significantly limits confidence. The score reflects a supplier with some inspection framework but insufficient market feedback to confirm stable quality performance.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

63 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small-scale trial orders, sample-based evaluation, or customized gate-related procurement where the buyer can conduct its own quality checks before placing larger orders.

The supplier appears suitable for buyers looking for aluminum gates, sliding gates, swing gates, villa entrance gates, or customized security gate products with low MOQ flexibility. Its strengths include a 10,000+ m² factory, verified supplier status, customization capability, Finished Product Inspection tag, and a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate.

Main risks include insufficient business performance data, no disclosed recent order volume, no disclosed transaction amount, no store rating, 0 reviews, only 1 year of Gold Supplier history, and no Trade Assurance support. These gaps reduce commercial transparency and increase procurement risk.

Growth potential exists if the supplier builds a stronger transaction record, accumulates verified customer reviews, improves platform credibility over time, and provides more complete quality and factory audit documentation. For now, buyers should start with controlled trial orders and require clear specifications, inspection standards, and delivery terms before scaling cooperation.