Shenzhen Haoshida Science And Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Shenzhen Haoshida Science And Technology Ltd.
Country/Region: Guangdong, China

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Haoshida Science And Technology Ltd. appears to be a medium-sized verified supplier specializing in Android all-in-one displays, digital signage kiosks, advertising displays, and interactive advertising display products. The company reports a factory area of over 15,000㎡ and more than 80 staff, indicating a meaningful production base, though not necessarily a large-scale enterprise by workforce size. Its profile shows relatively strong platform credibility, including 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and ODM service availability.

Business performance is moderate, with over 20 orders and CN¥1.8M+ transaction volume in the past six months. The store rating of 4.6 is acceptable, but the review count of 9 is limited, which reduces confidence in broad customer validation. With an 87.5% on-time delivery rate and response time within 3 hours, the supplier is suitable for buyers seeking customized digital signage products in small to medium procurement volumes, while requiring careful quality and delivery monitoring.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 15,000+㎡
• Employees: 80+ staff
• Verified supplier status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported production site exceeding 15,000㎡, which suggests a meaningful physical manufacturing or assembly capacity. The workforce of 80+ staff indicates a medium-sized operation rather than a very large-scale industrial supplier. The presence of verified supplier status provides additional confidence that the company has undergone some form of platform or third-party verification.

However, the available data does not include detailed production lines, monthly output, machinery lists, R&D team size, export markets, or factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company demonstrates a solid operational foundation, the depth of its manufacturing scale cannot be fully confirmed beyond the provided area, staff count, and verification status.

Scoring Rationale

The factory area is relatively strong and supports the view that the supplier has more than basic production capability. The employee count is moderate, which places the supplier closer to a medium-sized factory rather than a large-scale supply chain enterprise. Verified supplier status improves confidence, but the lack of detailed audit or production capacity data prevents a higher score. Overall, the company fits the “medium stable factory” category.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification/industry tags:
• Finished Product Inspection
• Full Customization
• ODM service available
• On-time delivery 87.5%

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility through a 7-year Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. These two elements provide buyers with a higher level of transactional protection and platform-backed credibility compared with non-verified or newly listed suppliers.

The presence of Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and ODM service tags also indicates that the supplier has platform-recognized service and quality-related capabilities. The verified supplier status further strengthens the supplier’s credibility profile. However, the provided data does not include international product certifications, factory audit certificates, ISO certification, safety certifications, or market-specific compliance documents. These areas should be treated as Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a relatively complete credibility structure: long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and multiple relevant service/quality tags. Seven years is a strong platform history and supports confidence in continuity. The only reason the score is not at the absolute maximum is the absence of detailed external compliance certificates or factory audit documentation in the provided data.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 20+
• Transaction amount in past 6 months: CN¥1.8M+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Number of reviews: 9

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 20 orders and CN¥1.8M+ transaction volume in the past six months. This shows that the company has active commercial traction and is not merely a dormant platform listing. The transaction amount is relatively meaningful, especially considering the listed products have unit prices mostly ranging from approximately CN¥1,129 to CN¥3,698, depending on product type.

The store rating of 4.6 is generally positive, but the review count is only 9, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. A small number of reviews means customer satisfaction is visible but not broadly validated across a large buyer base. The business performance is therefore better than low-volume suppliers, but not yet supported by a large number of orders or extensive customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable but moderate commercial activity. CN¥1.8M+ in six-month transaction value is a positive indicator, while 20+ orders suggests some recurring market acceptance. However, the limited review count reduces confidence in broad buyer validation. The score reflects a supplier with moderate transaction performance rather than a high-volume, highly reviewed seller.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Response time: ≤3 hours
• Full Customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours is acceptable for international sourcing communication and suggests reasonable sales responsiveness. The platform tags also indicate Full Customization and ODM service availability, which are important for buyers requiring product adaptation, branding, configuration changes, or customized display solutions.

However, the data does not specify the scope of customization, engineering support, sample lead time, design capability, language support, after-sales process, or technical documentation availability. Therefore, while customization capability is clearly indicated, the depth and execution quality of that service remain partially unverified based on the supplied information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has better-than-basic service capability because it supports Full Customization and ODM service. The response time is acceptable but not within the top benchmark of ≤1 hour. As a result, the supplier does not qualify for the highest 9–10 range, but it fits well into the upper part of the normal response and customization-capable category.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 87.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 87.5%, which falls within the 80%–89% range. This indicates that the supplier has a generally acceptable delivery record, but there is still measurable risk of delay. For buyers with flexible project timelines, this performance may be workable. For buyers with strict installation schedules, retail launch dates, or project-based deployment deadlines, closer order tracking would be necessary.

No additional data is provided regarding average lead time, production cycle, shipping methods, delay reasons, or peak-season capacity. These details are Insufficient Data and should be clarified before placing large or time-sensitive orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 87.5%, the supplier is near the upper end of this range, showing reasonably reliable delivery performance, but not strong enough to be considered top-tier. A score of 8 is appropriate.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Number of reviews: 9
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory area and staff data available
• Factory Verification: Supplier verification indicated as True

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.6, which is a positive quality and service signal. The Finished Product Inspection tag indicates that some form of product inspection capability or process is recognized on the platform. Verified supplier status also adds credibility to the supplier’s operational profile.

However, the review count is only 9, which is relatively limited and does not provide a broad base of customer feedback. The data also does not include defect rates, return rates, warranty performance, inspection reports, testing standards, product certifications, or customer complaint records. Therefore, the supplier has visible quality assurance indicators, but the customer feedback sample size remains small.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a good score because it has a positive store rating, Finished Product Inspection, and verified supplier status. These factors support basic quality confidence. However, the limited number of reviews prevents classification as a highly validated supplier with extensive customer feedback. The score reflects a supplier with solid quality signals but incomplete market validation.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Shenzhen Haoshida Science And Technology Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking digital signage, Android all-in-one displays, advertising display systems, and interactive display products, especially where small MOQ flexibility, customization, and ODM service are required. The supplier’s 7-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 15,000+㎡ factory area, and Finished Product Inspection tag provide a relatively credible sourcing foundation.

Suitable customer types:
- Small to medium-sized importers
- Project-based digital signage buyers
- Buyers requiring customized display configurations
- Buyers placing trial orders or medium-volume procurement
- Customers who value low MOQ flexibility

Main risks:
- Review count is limited at only 9, reducing the reliability of customer feedback.
- On-time delivery rate of 87.5% is acceptable but not top-tier.
- Product certifications, detailed factory audit reports, production capacity, and defect-rate data are Insufficient Data.
- Customization capability is indicated, but the exact technical scope is not fully described.

Growth potential:
The supplier shows clear potential due to its verified platform presence, stable transaction activity, customization capability, and medium-sized factory base. If it improves delivery consistency, increases verified customer reviews, and provides more detailed certification and quality documentation, it could become a stronger candidate for larger and more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.