Weifang Qiaoliang Craft Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Weifang Qiaoliang Craft Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong Province, offering outdoor plastic garden, bird repeller, anti-cat, and anti-climb spike products. Based on the provided data, the company shows a mixed supplier profile: it has a relatively large stated factory area of 10,000+ ㎡ and is marked as a verified supplier, but its reported workforce is only 10+ staff, indicating limited confirmed manpower scale. On -related credibility, the supplier has Gold Supplier status for 1 year, supports Trade Assurance, and lists Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. Commercial performance is still limited, with 10+ orders and CN¥27K+ transaction value in the past six months, while store rating is unavailable and review count is 0. The supplier may be suitable for small to medium buyers seeking low-MOQ outdoor plastic craft or garden protection products, but larger buyers should conduct additional qualification checks before placing major orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shandong Province, China
- Factory area: 10,000+ ㎡
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier reports a relatively large factory area, which suggests available physical production or operating space. However, the employee count of only 10+ staff limits the confirmed evidence of production scale. The verified supplier status provides a basic level of credibility, but the data does not include detailed production lines, annual capacity, equipment information, or factory audit reports.

Scoring Rationale
The company cannot be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain because the confirmed workforce is small and production capacity data is insufficient. At the same time, the 10,000+ ㎡ factory area and verified supplier status indicate that it has more than minimal operating infrastructure. Therefore, it fits best between a small supplier with basic production capability and a lower-end medium supplier.

Final Score: 13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / service labels: Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full Customization, Minor Customization
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verification status. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and customization-related labels strengthens the profile. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits long-term platform credibility. No external certifications, factory audit documents, or international compliance certificates are provided.

Scoring Rationale
Core platform mechanisms are present, including Trade Assurance and supplier verification, so the supplier has a credible basic platform foundation. The short Gold Supplier period prevents a higher score because long-term platform reliability has not yet been demonstrated. Compliance depth is also limited because no independent product or factory certifications are listed beyond platform tags.

Final Score: 15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 10+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥27K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded transaction activity, but the scale is relatively modest. More than 10 orders and CN¥27K+ transaction value over six months show some market validation, yet this is not enough to indicate strong commercial traction. The lack of store rating and zero reviews significantly reduce the ability to assess buyer satisfaction and repeat purchasing confidence.

Scoring Rationale
Business performance is not absent, but it remains at a low-to-moderate level. The supplier has completed some orders, but transaction value is limited and customer feedback data is unavailable. Because rating information is missing and there are no reviews, the supplier lacks sufficient commercial proof for a higher score.

Final Score: 10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Available
- Minor Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a reasonable service profile through customization-related platform labels and a stated response time within four hours. Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability suggest flexibility for buyers requiring product adaptation. However, the response time does not meet the strongest benchmark of one hour or less.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has clear customization capability and acceptable communication responsiveness. Since the response time is not within the top-tier threshold, it should not receive a 9–10 score. Still, the combination of customization services and ≤4h response supports a solid service capability rating.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 92.9%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is above 90%, which is a positive operational indicator. This suggests that, based on available platform data, the supplier has generally been able to meet delivery commitments. No additional data is provided on average lead time, logistics methods, or delay dispute records.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the rate is 92.9%, it meets the high-performance delivery threshold, though not enough supporting delivery details are available to justify a perfect score.

Final Score: 9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier lists Finished Product Inspection, which is a useful quality-control indicator. Verified supplier status also provides some platform-level confidence. However, the absence of store rating and the lack of customer reviews create a significant limitation in assessing actual buyer satisfaction, product consistency, and after-sales quality performance.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has basic quality assurance signals, especially Finished Product Inspection, but customer feedback evidence is weak. With no reviews and no available rating, the quality assessment cannot be considered well validated by the market. The score therefore remains in the lower-middle range.

Final Score: 12 / 20

Total Score

67 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small to medium-volume buyers seeking outdoor plastic garden, bird repeller, anti-cat spike, or anti-climb fence spike products with low MOQ requirements. The supplier shows acceptable platform credibility, customization capability, and strong on-time delivery performance.

However, buyers should be cautious with large-volume or quality-sensitive procurement because store rating is unavailable, review count is 0, transaction scale is modest, and confirmed workforce size is limited. Recommended risk controls include requesting product samples, confirming inspection standards, verifying actual production capacity, and using Trade Assurance for initial orders.

Overall, the supplier has growth potential due to its platform verification, customization labels, Finished Product Inspection, and 92.9% on-time delivery rate, but it still requires further commercial and quality validation before being treated as a highly reliable strategic supplier.