Wuxi Ivy Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Wuxi Ivy Textile Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Wuxi Ivy Textile Co., Ltd. is a China-based textile supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 3,300+㎡ and 60+ staff. The supplier demonstrates a solid platform presence, supported by 8 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. Its recent business performance is strong, with 400+ orders and CN¥4.6M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews. Delivery performance is also strong, with an on-time delivery rate of 97.4%. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking textile products with low MOQ options, customization-related flexibility, and proven platform transaction history. However, information on formal product inspection systems, factory certifications beyond supplier verification, and full customization capability is insufficient. Overall, this supplier is recommended for cooperation, particularly for small to medium-volume buyers and brands requiring reliable delivery and platform-backed purchasing protection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Wuxi Ivy Textile Co., Ltd.
• Location: Jiangsu, China
• Factory area: 3,300+㎡
• Employees: 60+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical production base with a reported factory area of more than 3,300 square meters and over 60 staff members. This indicates a functioning manufacturing operation with a basic-to-moderate production scale. The company is not presented as a large-scale industrial manufacturer based on the available data, but the combination of factory space, staffing, and verified supplier status suggests it has established operational capacity rather than being a purely trading-oriented or very small supplier.

The presence of supplier verification strengthens confidence in its company legitimacy and basic operating structure. However, the provided data does not include detailed production line quantity, monthly capacity, machinery list, factory audit reports, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, the assessment should remain moderate rather than top-tier.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the profile of a small-to-medium-sized stable factory. Its factory size and workforce are sufficient to support regular textile production and order fulfillment, but the scale is not large enough, based on the provided data, to classify it as a large-scale supply chain operator. Verified supplier status adds credibility, but the absence of detailed factory certification or production capacity data limits the score.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform/industry tags:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Response time ≤2h
• On-time delivery 97.4%

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 8 years, which is a strong indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance availability provides additional transactional protection for buyers, helping reduce procurement risk related to payment and delivery disputes. Supplier verification further supports platform credibility.

The listed platform tags also reinforce the supplier’s operational reliability, particularly the on-time delivery rate and response time. However, while the platform credibility is strong, the provided data does not specify additional third-party compliance certifications, product-specific certifications, or factory audit documentation beyond the verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

An 8-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status form a strong platform credibility profile. This indicates a supplier with established platform continuity and basic compliance backing. The score is not a perfect 20 because certification information beyond -related verification is insufficient, and no independent compliance certificates are provided in the dataset.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 400+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥4.6M+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong recent commercial activity. More than 400 orders within six months indicates active buyer engagement and consistent order flow. A transaction value exceeding CN¥4.6M over the same period suggests meaningful business volume rather than isolated or low-value transactions.

The store rating of 4.9, supported by 100+ reviews, further indicates generally positive customer acceptance. The review count is sufficient to provide a meaningful reference point, although it is not extremely large compared with very high-volume suppliers.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 400+ recent orders, CN¥4.6M+ transaction value, a 4.9 rating, and 100+ reviews supports a high business performance score. This supplier has clear commercial validation on the platform. The score is slightly below maximum because the available data does not provide order distribution, repeat customer rate, dispute rate, or detailed buyer segmentation.

Final Score

19 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates a relatively efficient communication standard. This is suitable for buyers requiring timely quotation, order confirmation, and production coordination. The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” suggests some level of customization support, especially for smaller trial orders or customized textile products.

However, the dataset does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” capability. There is no detailed information on design support, OEM/ODM scope, sampling process, artwork handling, packaging customization, or development lead time. Therefore, while the supplier appears service-oriented, its customization capability cannot be evaluated as fully comprehensive based on the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well in response speed and appears to support low-MOQ customization. However, because the response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, and full customization capability is not clearly documented, the score should remain within the normal-to-good service range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 97.4%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 97.4% is strong. This exceeds the 90% benchmark for high delivery reliability. For procurement teams, a delivery rate at this level indicates reduced risk of shipment delays and better planning reliability for inventory management, promotional schedules, and downstream customer commitments.

The data does not provide further details on average lead time, logistics methods, seasonal fluctuation, or late shipment dispute history. Nevertheless, the provided on-time delivery percentage alone supports a high score in this category.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 97.4%, the supplier is clearly within the top delivery performance band. Since the provided metric is strong and directly relevant, the supplier receives the maximum score in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 100+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Supplier verification is marked as True

Elaboration

The supplier’s 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews indicate positive customer feedback and a reasonable volume of buyer validation. This supports confidence in product consistency, service quality, and order fulfillment experience from previous transactions.

Supplier verification provides an additional layer of credibility regarding the company’s existence and basic operational legitimacy. However, the dataset does not confirm whether the supplier provides Finished Product Inspection. It also does not include defect rate, return rate, quality control workflow, inspection standards, material testing, or third-party inspection records.

Scoring Rationale

The high rating and review count support a strong quality and customer feedback score. Supplier verification also adds confidence. However, because Finished Product Inspection information is not available and no detailed quality control system is provided, the score should not reach the highest range. The supplier appears reliable based on platform feedback, but the quality assurance system is not fully documented.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation

Recommended for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking textile products with relatively low MOQ options, strong platform transaction history, and reliable delivery performance.

Suitable Customer Types

• Small to medium-sized buyers looking for flexible MOQ options
• E-commerce sellers requiring platform-backed sourcing through Trade Assurance
• Brands or distributors seeking textile products with stable recent transaction records
• Buyers prioritizing fast communication and strong on-time delivery performance

Main Risk Points

1. Limited factory scale information: Factory area and employee count indicate a moderate operation, but detailed production capacity is not provided.
2. Quality control transparency is incomplete: Finished Product Inspection information is marked as Insufficient Data.
3. Full customization capability is not confirmed: The supplier has a “Low MOQ for customization” tag, but detailed OEM/ODM or full customization scope is not provided.
4. Certification depth is unclear: Apart from -related verification and platform credibility, no additional factory or product certifications are provided.

Growth Potential

The supplier shows strong commercial momentum, with 400+ orders and CN¥4.6M+ transaction value over the past six months. Its 8-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, 4.9 rating, and 97.4% on-time delivery rate suggest a reliable platform-based supplier with good potential for continued cooperation. If the supplier can provide clearer quality inspection documentation, customization details, and factory audit information, it could become more suitable for larger or more quality-sensitive procurement programs.