Xiamen Cleanwell Households I/E Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary
Xiamen Cleanwell Households I/E Co.,Ltd is a Fujian, China-based household cleaning products supplier with listed product coverage including cleaning cloths, microfiber kitchen cloths, scrub cloths, disposable dry wipes, and floor cleaner wipes. The company shows a moderate operational base, with a reported factory area of 7,600+㎡, 50+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its strongest profile is platform credibility: it is listed as an 18-year Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance, indicating long-term platform presence and transaction protection. However, business performance data is modest, with 20+ orders and CN¥33.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, while store rating is unavailable and review count is 0. Service capability appears acceptable but not premium, with response time ≤5h and low-MOQ customization labeling. Delivery performance is mid-level at 84.6% on-time delivery. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ cleaning product sourcing with platform-backed transaction safeguards, while quality validation should be strengthened before larger procurement commitments.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength
Basis: Factory area is 7,600+㎡, employee count is 50+ staff, and verified supplier status is marked as True.
Elaboration: The supplier has a documented physical production base and a workforce size that indicates basic-to-medium production capability. The 7,600+㎡ factory area suggests it is not a very small workshop, while 50+ staff indicates a moderate labor structure rather than a large-scale manufacturing organization. Verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s operational existence and factory profile.
Scoring Rationale: The company demonstrates stable foundational capacity, but the available data does not indicate a large-scale supply chain, extensive workforce, advanced production lines, or additional factory certifications beyond verified supplier status. Therefore, it fits the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top tier.
Final Score: 15/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis: Gold Supplier is True, Gold Supplier tenure is 18 years, Trade Assurance is True, and certification/industry labels include “Low MOQ for customization,” “Response time ≤5h,” and “On-time delivery 84.6%.” Verified supplier status is also marked as True.
Elaboration: The supplier has a long platform history, which is a significant credibility factor. Trade Assurance support provides transaction protection, and verified supplier status strengthens platform-based trust. The available labels cover customization flexibility, response speed, and delivery performance, but no additional third-party compliance certifications are provided in the data.
Scoring Rationale: An 18-year Gold Supplier history combined with Trade Assurance and verified supplier status indicates a strong and mature platform credibility profile. The only limitation is the absence of broader certification details beyond /platform labels.
Final Score: 19/20

3. Business Performance
Basis: Past six-month order volume is 20+, transaction value is CN¥33.8K+, store rating is unavailable, and review count is 0.
Elaboration: The supplier has recorded transaction activity, but the order and transaction scale remain relatively limited. The absence of a store rating and zero reviews reduce the visibility of customer-side commercial validation. While 20+ orders show some recent purchasing activity, the transaction value does not indicate high-volume procurement performance.
Scoring Rationale: Business performance is supported by real recent orders and transaction value, but the scale is modest and lacks customer review confirmation. Missing store rating data is a key limitation, so the supplier should not be scored as a high-performing commercial vendor.
Final Score: 11/20

4. Service Capability
Basis: Communication response time is ≤5h. Platform label indicates “Low MOQ for customization.” No explicit Full Customization capability is provided.
Elaboration: A response time within five hours suggests acceptable communication efficiency for standard sourcing inquiries. The low-MOQ customization label indicates some flexibility for customized orders, but the data does not confirm full customization capability, design support, OEM/ODM scope, or dedicated customization workflow.
Scoring Rationale: The supplier appears serviceable for routine communication and low-MOQ customized purchasing, but it does not meet the top-tier standard of ≤1h response time plus confirmed strong customization capability.
Final Score: 7/10

5. Delivery Performance
Basis: On-time delivery rate is 84.6%.
Elaboration: The delivery rate falls within the 80–89% range. This indicates the supplier has a moderate delivery record, but it is not strong enough to be considered highly reliable for time-sensitive or strict schedule-driven procurement without further confirmation.
Scoring Rationale: Based on the scoring rule, an 84.6% on-time delivery rate qualifies for the 7–8 point range. The figure is acceptable but leaves a measurable risk of delayed shipments.
Final Score: 8/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis: Store rating is unavailable, review count is 0, verified supplier status is True, and no Finished Product Inspection data is provided.
Elaboration: Quality visibility is limited. Verified supplier status provides some basic confidence in company legitimacy, but there is no customer feedback base, no store rating, and no confirmed finished product inspection system in the provided data. The lack of reviews makes it difficult to assess consistency in product quality, after-sales handling, or buyer satisfaction.
Scoring Rationale: The supplier has limited quality assurance evidence beyond verified supplier status. Because customer feedback and finished product inspection information are missing, quality performance cannot be strongly validated.
Final Score: 10/20

Total Score: 70/100

Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small to medium-volume buyers sourcing household cleaning cloths, microfiber products, scrub cloths, disposable wipes, or floor cleaning wipes, especially where low MOQ and Trade Assurance are important. The supplier’s main strengths are long platform history, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and moderate factory capacity. Main risks include insufficient customer feedback, unavailable store rating, zero reviews, no provided Finished Product Inspection data, and only mid-level on-time delivery performance. Growth potential exists if the supplier improves review accumulation, quality documentation, inspection transparency, and delivery reliability. For larger or quality-sensitive procurement, sample testing and pre-shipment inspection are recommended before scaling orders.