Zhejiang Hailiang Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Zhejiang Hailiang Co., Ltd. appears to be a large-scale China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of over 660,000㎡ and more than 7,300 staff. The available data indicates strong manufacturing scale and supplier verification status, suggesting substantial production infrastructure for copper-related tube and coil products listed on the platform. The supplier has been an Gold Supplier for 9 years and shows a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which supports platform credibility and delivery reliability. However, several commercial validation indicators are missing, including past six-month order volume, transaction value, shop rating, and customer review evidence, with the review count listed as 0. Trade Assurance is also not supported according to the provided data. Overall, this supplier is most suitable for buyers prioritizing large production capacity and delivery reliability, while buyers requiring strong online transaction history, customer feedback, or Trade Assurance protection should conduct further due diligence before placing major orders.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory area: 660,000+㎡
- Employee count: 7,300+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates very large physical and workforce capacity based on the reported factory size and staff number. A 660,000+㎡ facility and 7,300+ employees indicate a substantial manufacturing organization rather than a small workshop or trading-only entity. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its stated operational presence.
Scoring Rationale
The company fits the highest scoring band because the available data shows large-scale production infrastructure, significant staffing, and verified supplier status. While no additional factory audit certificates are provided beyond verification, the scale indicators are strong enough to support a near-maximum score.
Final Score
20 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
- Trade Assurance: False
- Certification / industry labels: “Response time ≤10h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
Elaboration
The supplier has a long-standing Gold Supplier profile of 9 years, which provides meaningful platform history. The verified supplier status also adds credibility. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and the provided certification or industry labels are limited to response time and delivery performance rather than broader compliance, factory audit, or product certification information.
Scoring Rationale
The 9-year Gold Supplier record and supplier verification are strong credibility indicators. However, the absence of Trade Assurance reduces buyer protection, and certification completeness cannot be confirmed from the supplied data. Therefore, the supplier is credible but not fully comprehensive in platform compliance protection.
Final Score
16 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Past 6-month order volume: Insufficient Data
- Past 6-month transaction amount: Insufficient Data
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
Elaboration
The provided dataset does not include recent order volume, transaction value, or shop rating. The review count is listed as 0, which means there is no available customer feedback evidence within the supplied data. This limits the ability to validate actual online sales performance or buyer satisfaction through platform transaction records.
Scoring Rationale
Although the supplier has strong company scale, business performance scoring must be based on transaction and review data. Since order volume, transaction amount, and rating are missing, and review count is 0, the commercial performance cannot be sufficiently verified. This places the supplier below the normal stable-trading range.
Final Score
7 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤10h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is listed as within 10 hours, which indicates basic responsiveness but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. No data is provided confirming Full Customization or advanced customization capability.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows acceptable communication responsiveness, but the response speed is not exceptionally fast. Since customization capability is not confirmed, the score remains in the basic-to-moderate service range rather than the high-service range.
Final Score
6 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is reported as 100.0%, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the dataset. This suggests reliable fulfillment performance according to the provided platform label.
Scoring Rationale
Based on the stated scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True
Elaboration
The supplier has factory verification, which provides some quality-related confidence at the supplier level. However, there is no shop rating, no customer review evidence, and no provided Finished Product Inspection information. The lack of review data limits the ability to assess buyer satisfaction or product consistency from customer feedback.
Scoring Rationale
Factory verification supports a basic level of quality credibility, but the absence of customer ratings, reviews, and finished product inspection data prevents a higher score. The supplier cannot be classified as having a complete quality assurance and feedback system based only on the provided information.
Final Score
10 / 20
Total Score
Total Score: 69 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Zhejiang Hailiang Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking a large-scale supplier with strong manufacturing capacity, verified supplier status, long Gold Supplier history, and excellent reported delivery performance. It may be appropriate for buyers sourcing copper tubes, copper coils, or related listed products where factory scale and delivery reliability are key priorities.
The main risks are insufficient commercial performance data, 0 customer reviews, missing shop rating, no disclosed recent transaction value, and lack of Trade Assurance. Quality validation is also incomplete due to missing Finished Product Inspection and customer feedback data.
Before large-volume procurement, buyers should request factory audit documents, product inspection reports, transaction references, samples, and written quality specifications. The supplier shows strong growth and cooperation potential due to its scale and platform history, but further verification is necessary before high-value or long-term purchasing commitments.
Leave your comment