zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Zhengzhou Cy Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Zhengzhou Cy Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Henan, offering specialized scientific and industrial equipment including air jet sieving machines, sintering furnaces, electrode growth equipment, induction melting/casting equipment, and porcelain ovens. The company shows a moderate physical operating scale, with a reported factory area of 3,400+㎡ and 50+ staff, supported by verified supplier status. Its strongest credibility indicators come from platform backing: 12 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and listed service/quality tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, and Full Customization. Commercial performance appears active but not high-volume, with 30+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months. However, customer feedback depth is limited, with only 1 review despite a 5.0 store rating. The most significant concern is delivery reliability, as the on-time shipping rate is only 54.5%. This supplier may suit buyers seeking specialized equipment with customization needs, but delivery risk requires careful contract control.

Zhengzhou Cy Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 3,400+㎡
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a defined factory footprint and workforce, indicating an operating manufacturing or production-support structure rather than a purely trading profile. A 3,400+㎡ facility and 50+ staff suggest basic-to-moderate production capacity, suitable for specialized equipment categories with relatively low MOQ requirements such as 1 set. The verified supplier status adds support to the company’s operational credibility.

Scoring Rationale:
The company does not reach the scale typically associated with large, high-capacity supply chains, but the available data supports that it has stable basic production capability. The combination of factory space, staff count, and supplier verification places it above a weak or insufficient-data profile, while still below a larger industrial manufacturer.

Final Score: 13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full customization

Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility through long-term Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance participation. A 12-year Gold Supplier history is a meaningful platform-based trust indicator. The listed tags also show that the supplier presents warranty, inspection, ODM, and customization capabilities on the platform.

Scoring Rationale:
This is one of the supplier’s strongest dimensions. Long platform tenure, Trade Assurance, and multiple service/quality tags provide a relatively complete credibility structure. No additional third-party certifications beyond the provided platform tags are listed, so the score is strong but not absolute.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 30+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥338K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Review count: 1

Elaboration:
The supplier has recent transaction activity, with more than 30 orders and CN¥338K+ in transaction value over six months. This indicates market activity and some degree of buyer acceptance. However, the available review base is extremely limited, with only one review supporting the 5.0 rating.

Scoring Rationale:
The order count and transaction value suggest a stable but not high-volume commercial profile. The 5.0 rating is positive, but because it is based on only 1 review, it does not provide strong statistical confidence. The supplier therefore fits a moderate business-performance level rather than a high-validation profile.

Final Score: 14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: listed as available
- ODM service: listed as available

Elaboration:
The supplier shows acceptable communication responsiveness, with a reported response time within four hours. It also lists Full Customization and ODM service, which are relevant for buyers sourcing specialized equipment requiring technical adaptation or configuration.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates more than basic service capability due to customization and ODM support. However, the response time is not within the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour, so the service score should remain below the top tier.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time shipping rate: 54.5%

Elaboration:
Delivery performance is the supplier’s weakest disclosed area. A 54.5% on-time shipping rate indicates that nearly half of measured shipments were not dispatched on time, based on the provided platform data.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring framework, delivery rates below 70% should receive below 5 points. This metric creates a significant procurement risk, especially for buyers with strict project schedules, production deadlines, or installation timelines.

Final Score: 4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Review count: 1
- Finished Product Inspection: listed
- Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a perfect store rating, but the credibility of that score is limited by the very small number of reviews. Finished Product Inspection provides a positive quality-control indicator, and verified supplier status supports basic quality and operational credibility.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has relevant quality assurance indicators, especially Finished Product Inspection and verification status. However, customer feedback is too limited to strongly validate consistent product quality across multiple buyers. This results in a good but not top-tier score.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

73 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Zhengzhou Cy Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking specialized scientific or industrial equipment, especially those requiring low MOQ purchasing, ODM service, or full customization. The supplier has strong platform credibility and acceptable business activity, but the low on-time shipping rate of 54.5% is a major risk. Buyers should use Trade Assurance, confirm production and delivery schedules in writing, require pre-shipment inspection, and avoid urgent orders until delivery reliability is further validated. Its growth potential lies in specialized equipment supply and customization capability, but delivery performance and limited customer review depth should be closely monitored.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Lachoi Scientific Instrument (Shaoxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lachoi Scientific Instrument (Shaoxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Akmlab Scientific Zhejiang Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Akmlab Scientific Zhejiang Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cedrec Scientific Instruments (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cedrec Scientific Instruments (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Truly Instrument Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Truly Instrument Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Want Balance Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Want Balance Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Newgoer Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Newgoer Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xintai Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xintai Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Taihua Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Taihua Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Biojoint Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Biojoint Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Toption Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Toption Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Feiyang Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Feiyang Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuyang Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuyang Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Haoshen Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengshui Haoshen Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Scs Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Scs Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Kangji Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Kangji Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Wanli Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Wanli Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Oscar Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Oscar Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Pioneer Medical Instrument Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Pioneer Medical Instrument Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Huifeng Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Huifeng Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Unitech Intelligent Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Unitech Intelligent Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Hebei Tianyue Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Tianyue Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhaoqing Viko Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhaoqing Viko Metal Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Chaoyang Heping Chimi Stationery Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shantou Chaoyang Heping Chimi Stationery Factory Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fangbei Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fangbei Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Enlightenment Intelligent Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Enlightenment Intelligent Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Zhaosheng Education Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Zhaosheng Education Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huayuan Metal Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huayuan Metal Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Botuolini Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Botuolini Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Shuncha Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Shuncha Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Getech Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Getech Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peng Ze Xiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peng Ze Xiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ebest Digital Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ebest Digital Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Shiffon Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Shiffon Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amos Food (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Amos Food (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tata Steel (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tata Steel (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shenxiangyu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shenxiangyu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Hanfei Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Hanfei Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Bingqiang Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Bingqiang Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Honghaotian Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Honghaotian Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026