Beijing Huiyinda Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Beijing Huiyinda Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Beijing, with a reported factory area of 3,000+㎡ and 110+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized supplier with verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 5 years, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels including warranty availability, low MOQ for customization, and finished product inspection. Its recent commercial performance is relatively strong, with 400+ orders and CN¥2.1M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating and 100+ reviews. Delivery performance is notably strong, with a 98.8% on-time dispatch rate. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking a verified mid-scale supplier with active platform transaction records, low-MOQ customization support, and reliable shipment execution. Key caution areas include limited information on formal manufacturing certifications, no explicit Full Customization confirmation, and only moderate transparency on product-specific quality standards.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company: Beijing Huiyinda Technology Co., Ltd.
• Country/Region: China, Beijing
• Factory area: 3,000+㎡
• Employees: 110+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a stated production site of more than 3,000㎡ and a workforce exceeding 110 employees. This indicates a meaningful operational base rather than a very small trading operation. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic operational profile of the company. However, the provided data does not include detailed production line count, annual production capacity, equipment list, factory audit report details, or specific manufacturing management certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The company fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. The employee count and factory area suggest basic to moderate production capability, while the verified supplier status improves confidence in its operational legitimacy. However, it does not reach the highest tier because the data does not show large-scale manufacturing capacity, multi-site production, advanced factory certifications, or detailed audit documentation. Therefore, a mid-to-upper score is justified.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier tenure: 5 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform/industry labels: “Warranty available”, “Low MOQ for customization”, “Finished product inspection”

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility profile. A 5-year Gold Supplier record indicates continuity on the platform, while Trade Assurance provides transaction protection for buyers. Verified supplier status further strengthens credibility. The available platform labels also show buyer-facing service and quality-related features, particularly warranty availability and finished product inspection.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates strong platform compliance credibility through Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and multiple relevant platform labels. The 5-year tenure is a positive indicator of platform stability. However, the data does not include detailed third-party certification documents, factory audit certificates, ISO certification, or specific product compliance certificates. As a result, the supplier is credible from a platform perspective but not fully supported by comprehensive compliance documentation in the provided dataset.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 400+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥2.1M+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier shows active recent commercial traction, with more than 400 orders and over CN¥2.1 million in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has already been tested by multiple platform buyers and has generated meaningful sales activity. The store rating of 4.6 is positive, and 100+ reviews provide a reasonable feedback base for assessing buyer experience.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 400+ recent orders and CN¥2.1M+ transaction value supports a strong business performance score. The rating of 4.6 is good, though not at the very highest level. The review count is also meaningful but not extremely large. Overall, the supplier demonstrates strong market validation and active transaction history, but the score is kept slightly below the maximum because the rating and review volume do not fully indicate top-tier customer satisfaction at scale.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Platform label: “Low MOQ for customization”
• Explicit Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for platform sourcing. The “Low MOQ for customization” label suggests some level of customization support, particularly for buyers requiring smaller customized batches. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability, design support, private labeling scope, engineering support, or sample development processes.

Scoring Rationale

The service capability is solid but not top-tier. A response time of ≤2h is good, but the highest scoring range requires response within one hour and strong customization capability. Since Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed and only low-MOQ customization is stated, the supplier should be considered capable of basic customization support rather than advanced customized development.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 98.8%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time dispatch rate is 98.8%, which is a very strong delivery indicator. This suggests that the supplier has effective order handling and dispatch execution based on the available platform data.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 98.8%, the supplier is well above the threshold and demonstrates excellent delivery reliability. There is no negative delivery-related data provided.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Reviews: 100+
• Finished product inspection: Present as platform label
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.6 store rating supported by more than 100 reviews, indicating generally positive buyer feedback. The “Finished product inspection” label provides an additional quality-control signal, suggesting that goods are inspected before completion or shipment. Verified supplier status also adds credibility to the supplier’s general quality assurance profile. However, the dataset does not include defect rates, inspection reports, product-specific certifications, test standards, or detailed quality management system certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good quality feedback foundation, supported by positive ratings, a meaningful number of reviews, finished product inspection, and verification. However, the rating is not exceptionally high, and the lack of detailed quality certification or inspection documentation prevents a top-tier score. The supplier appears suitable for standard sourcing scenarios, but buyers with strict compliance or technical quality requirements should request additional documentation.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with standard due diligence before bulk purchasing.

Beijing Huiyinda Technology Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, active recent transaction performance, verified supplier status, and excellent delivery reliability. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking a medium-sized Chinese supplier with proven transaction history, Trade Assurance support, low-MOQ customization options, and stable dispatch performance.

Best-fit customer types:
- Small to medium buyers requiring low-MOQ sourcing
- Buyers prioritizing verified suppliers with Trade Assurance
- Procurement teams needing suppliers with active recent order history
- Customers seeking products within the listed product categories and requiring finished product inspection support

Main risk points:
- Formal factory or management certifications beyond platform verification: Insufficient Data
- Explicit Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
- Product-specific compliance, test reports, or technical certifications: Insufficient Data
- Detailed production capacity, equipment, and quality control process data: Insufficient Data

Growth potential:
The supplier has solid growth potential due to its 400+ recent orders, CN¥2.1M+ six-month transaction value, 5-year Gold Supplier history, and 98.8% on-time dispatch rate. If the supplier can provide more transparent certification documents, detailed inspection reports, and clearer customization capabilities, it could become more suitable for larger or more compliance-sensitive procurement programs.