zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Teraysun Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Teraysun Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. is a China-based electric scooter supplier located in Beijing, with a reported factory area of 13,000+㎡ and 80+ staff. The company shows a solid mid-sized manufacturing profile, supported by verified supplier status, 11 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform labels including warranty availability, low MOQ for customization, and finished product inspection. Its product listings focus on electric scooters with varied motor power and warehouse-related offerings, with low MOQ of 1 piece across the provided items. Business performance appears commercially validated, with 100+ orders and CN¥3.7M+ transaction value in the past six months, a 4.9 store rating, and 40+ reviews. However, response time is ≤4 hours rather than within one hour, and the on-time dispatch rate of 84.2% indicates moderate delivery reliability rather than top-tier fulfillment. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking verified electric scooter sourcing with moderate order flexibility and platform-backed transaction protection.

Teraysun Technology (beijing) Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Beijing, China
  • Factory area: 13,000+㎡
  • Employees: 80+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a measurable factory footprint of over 13,000㎡ and a workforce of more than 80 staff. This indicates that the company is not a micro-scale trading operation based on the provided data, but rather has a defined operational base with moderate production and organizational capacity. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic legitimacy of the company profile.

However, the available data does not provide detailed production line numbers, monthly production capacity, equipment lists, R&D team size, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company demonstrates stable mid-sized supplier characteristics, there is insufficient evidence to classify it as a large-scale, highly mature manufacturing group.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size is relatively solid, and the employee count supports basic-to-moderate production capability. Verified supplier status further strengthens the company profile. However, the staff scale of 80+ does not clearly indicate a large-scale supply chain, and no additional factory certifications or detailed audit documents are provided. This places the supplier in the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Low MOQ for customization, Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. An 11-year Gold Supplier history suggests long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance availability provides transaction protection for buyers, while verified supplier status supports basic compliance credibility. The listed platform labels also indicate additional buyer-facing safeguards, including warranty availability and finished product inspection.

The data does not include independent third-party product certifications, regulatory compliance certificates, or specific international market certifications. Therefore, the assessment is limited to platform-level credibility and provided certification labels only.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs strongly in this dimension due to long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple useful platform labels. The 11-year duration is a significant credibility factor. The only limitation is the absence of detailed external certification data beyond the platform-provided labels.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥3.7M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 40+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated clear commercial activity on the platform, with more than 100 orders and over CN¥3.7 million in transaction value in the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has actual recent sales validation rather than only a static product listing presence. A store rating of 4.9 is strong and suggests generally positive buyer satisfaction.

The number of reviews, at 40+, provides useful feedback evidence, though it is not large enough to represent very broad market validation. Still, the combination of recent orders, transaction value, and high rating supports a positive business performance assessment.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows strong recent business activity, especially considering the transaction value and order volume within a six-month period. The 4.9 rating reinforces buyer confidence. The review count is moderate rather than extensive, which prevents a perfect score, but overall commercial verification is strong.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤4 hours
  • Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, but it does not meet the highest service benchmark of response within one hour. The platform label “Low MOQ for customization” suggests some level of customization flexibility, particularly for smaller-volume buyers. However, the data does not explicitly state that the supplier supports Full Customization.

Because Full Customization capability is not confirmed, the service capability assessment should remain moderate. The supplier appears suitable for buyers who need responsive communication and low-MOQ customization options, but buyers requiring deep OEM/ODM customization should verify capabilities directly before placing larger orders.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is reasonable but not top-tier. The customization label is positive, but the lack of explicit Full Customization data limits the score. Therefore, the supplier fits the “normal response with basic customization capability” range rather than the highest service category.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 84.2%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is 84.2%, which falls within the 80%–89% range. This indicates moderate delivery reliability. It is not a poor performance level, but it also does not reach the stronger benchmark of above 90%.

For procurement planning, buyers should consider this delivery performance acceptable for standard purchasing but should manage lead time expectations carefully, especially for time-sensitive orders or seasonal demand peaks.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 84.2%, the supplier sits in the middle of this band. The score reflects acceptable but not excellent delivery reliability.

Final Score

7 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 40+
  • Finished product inspection: Listed
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9, supported by 40+ reviews. The presence of “Finished product inspection” is a positive quality-control indicator, as it suggests that final goods inspection is part of the supplier’s stated quality assurance process. Verified supplier status and warranty availability further support buyer confidence.

However, the review base is moderate rather than large, and the data does not include defect rates, return rates, inspection pass rates, product certification details, or independent quality audit results. Therefore, quality performance appears positive but cannot be classified as fully proven at a large scale based only on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The high rating, review evidence, finished product inspection label, and verified supplier status justify a strong score. The score is not higher because review volume is limited and detailed product-level quality metrics are not provided.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 7 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 17 / 20
Total 84 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation with controlled procurement risk.

Teraysun Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. is a suitable supplier for buyers sourcing electric scooters through with a preference for verified suppliers, Trade Assurance protection, low MOQ purchasing, and evidence of recent transaction activity. The supplier is especially suitable for small to medium-sized importers, online retailers, trial-order buyers, and buyers requiring flexible order quantities.

Key strengths include 11 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, 100+ recent orders, CN¥3.7M+ six-month transaction value, a 4.9 store rating, and finished product inspection labeling.

Main risks include the 84.2% on-time dispatch rate, which is moderate rather than excellent, and Insufficient Data regarding Full Customization capability, detailed factory certifications, production capacity, and independent quality audit results. Buyers with strict delivery windows or advanced OEM/ODM requirements should request additional documentation before scaling orders.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential and credible platform-backed performance, making it a strong candidate for trial orders and progressive volume expansion after delivery and quality verification.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Beijing Feeleato Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Feeleato Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Zhongantaihua Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Zhongantaihua Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Huiyinda Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Huiyinda Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jiacheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jiacheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Dwin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Dwin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Perfectlaser Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Perfectlaser Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Alpicool Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Alpicool Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Beautysub Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Beautysub Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Bcd Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Bcd Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Trusus Technology (Beijing) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Trusus Technology (Beijing) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Yuwei Photoeletric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Yuwei Photoeletric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Rongheyuan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Rongheyuan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Hanbo Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Hanbo Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Dazheng Yongye Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Dazheng Yongye Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Mkt Medicine Science And Technology Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Mkt Medicine Science And Technology Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Zhongsheng Tianrui Refrigeration Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Zhongsheng Tianrui Refrigeration Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengchi (Beijing) Water Treatment Equipment Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengchi (Beijing) Water Treatment Equipment Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Tongou Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Tongou Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Dongguan Tianpei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tianpei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongyu Silicone Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hongyu Silicone Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sanyu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sanyu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuji Younuo Electromechanical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuji Younuo Electromechanical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jinbiao Construction Materials Tech Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jinbiao Construction Materials Tech Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Ydstone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Ydstone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhibiao Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Zhibiao Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Wennuan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Wennuan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xin Yuhui Biotech (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xin Yuhui Biotech (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Benefitbee Bee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Benefitbee Bee Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taiqian Haina Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taiqian Haina Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jixiang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jixiang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zheshijia Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zheshijia Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shahe Huajinde Glass Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shahe Huajinde Glass Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Infront Machinery Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Infront Machinery Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Quanzhou Huazuan Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Quanzhou Huazuan Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Telijing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Telijing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hengdong Aluminum Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hengdong Aluminum Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Deson Insulated Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Deson Insulated Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jinben Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jinben Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026