Xin Yuhui Biotech (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Xin Yuhui Biotech (Shandong) Co., Ltd. is a China-based biotech ingredient supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of over 17,000 m² and more than 60 staff. Its listed product portfolio focuses on collagen peptide powder and chondroitin sulfate variants, including bovine, porcine, shark cartilage, and feed-production applications, with a minimum order quantity of 25 kilograms across the provided products. The supplier shows basic manufacturing capacity and has a verified supplier status, but its platform credibility is limited by only 1 year as an Gold Supplier and the absence of Trade Assurance. Commercial validation is weak because recent order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer reviews are either missing or zero. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking early-stage supplier development or sample-level sourcing, but risk controls are needed before large-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 17,000+ m²
- Staff size: 60+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier reports a factory area of more than 17,000 m², which indicates a meaningful physical production base rather than a very small trading operation. A workforce of over 60 staff suggests basic organizational and production capacity, though the employee scale is not large enough to clearly classify the company as a major large-scale industrial supplier. The verified supplier status provides some support for the existence and basic credibility of the operation.

Scoring Rationale
The company has a solid factory footprint and verified supplier status, which supports a mid-level assessment of manufacturing strength. However, the available data does not include detailed production lines, annual capacity, equipment information, quality certifications, or audit reports beyond the verified supplier indicator. Therefore, the supplier appears to be a medium-sized stable factory rather than a fully proven large-scale supply chain partner.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: False
- Certification / industry tags: ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization, Response time ≤11h
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has Gold Supplier status and verified supplier status, which gives it a basic level of platform credibility. The availability of ODM service, full customization, and minor customization also indicates that the supplier presents itself as capable of handling different buyer requirements. However, the Gold Supplier history is short at only 1 year, and Trade Assurance is not supported based on the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has several credibility signals, including Gold Supplier status and supplier verification, but the platform profile is not yet mature. The lack of Trade Assurance reduces buyer protection, especially for first-time international procurement. The certification and industry tag set is useful but mainly service-oriented; no broader factory, product safety, or management system certifications are provided in the data. This supports a basic-to-moderate credibility rating rather than a high-trust platform assessment.

Final Score
13 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: Insufficient Data
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: Insufficient Data
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The supplier’s recent commercial performance cannot be strongly validated from the provided information. No recent order count, transaction value, or store rating is available, and the review count is listed as 0. This means there is no visible buyer feedback base or transaction record to support claims of stable market acceptance.

Scoring Rationale
Business performance is the weakest area in the evaluation. While the company may have production capability, the lack of recent order data and transaction amount prevents confirmation of actual sales momentum on the platform. A review count of 0 also means there is no customer-side evidence of product quality, delivery reliability, or service consistency. As a result, the supplier has limited commercial validation from the available dataset.

Final Score
7 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤11h
- Full customization: Available
- Minor customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier offers multiple customization-related services, including ODM service, full customization, and minor customization. This indicates flexibility for buyers requiring tailored product specifications, packaging, or development support, within the limits of the data provided. The stated response time of ≤11 hours is acceptable, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within 1 hour.

Scoring Rationale
The service capability is relatively positive because customization options are clearly listed. However, the response time is moderate rather than highly responsive, and there is no additional data on dedicated account management, technical support, multilingual communication, or after-sales service. Therefore, the supplier demonstrates usable service capability but not top-tier service responsiveness.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The provided on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. Based on the scoring framework, any on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest score range. This suggests that, within the available platform data, the supplier has performed well in meeting shipment timelines.

Scoring Rationale
The delivery score is high because the supplier reaches the strongest benchmark in the evaluation model. However, the interpretation should be slightly cautious because the dataset does not provide the number of orders supporting this delivery rate. Since order volume is missing, the 100.0% rate is positive but not fully contextualized by transaction scale.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification / Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has verified supplier status, which gives some baseline confidence regarding company existence and platform-level verification. However, there is no available store rating, no customer reviews, and no data confirming Finished Product Inspection. For products such as collagen peptide powder and chondroitin sulfate, quality assurance information is especially important, but the provided dataset does not include detailed quality-control systems, testing reports, or product certifications beyond the listed product names and platform tags.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier receives limited credit for verified supplier status, but the absence of customer feedback and quality inspection data significantly weakens the quality assessment. With 0 reviews and no store rating, there is no customer-based evidence of product consistency or satisfaction. Because Finished Product Inspection is not provided, the quality assurance system cannot be considered complete based on the current data.

Final Score
9 / 20

Total Score

61 / 100

• Company Strength: 15 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 13 / 20
• Business Performance: 7 / 20
• Service Capability: 7 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 9 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation may be considered, but only with controlled procurement risk. Xin Yuhui Biotech (Shandong) Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking sample orders, small-batch purchasing, supplier qualification, or early-stage sourcing of collagen peptide powder and chondroitin sulfate products. The supplier has a meaningful factory area, verified supplier status, customization capability, and a strong stated on-time delivery rate.

However, it is not yet recommended as a primary large-volume supplier without further verification. The main risks are insufficient transaction data, no disclosed recent order volume, no disclosed transaction value, no store rating, 0 customer reviews, no Trade Assurance, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection. Buyers should request product specifications, third-party test reports, quality-control documents, production capacity evidence, and sample validation before placing larger orders.

The supplier’s growth potential lies in its factory scale, product focus, and customization capabilities, but stronger commercial history and more transparent quality documentation are needed to improve procurement confidence.