Fuzhou Yu Xin Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Fuzhou Yu Xin Electronic Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Fujian, offering electronic detection and wall-scanning related products such as stud finders, wall scanners, metal/AC detectors, and multi-frequency wire detection tools. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, supported by 21 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, fast response within one hour, and a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Its recent commercial performance is moderate, with 20+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 5.0 store rating but only 7 reviews. However, key factory-scale indicators such as factory area and employee count are not provided, limiting the ability to fully assess production capacity. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified platform suppliers for small to medium-volume sourcing, sample orders, or controlled procurement programs, while larger-scale buyers should request additional capacity and quality documentation before committing to major orders.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Company name: Fuzhou Yu Xin Electronic Co., Ltd.
- Country/region: China, Fujian Province
- Factory area: Insufficient Data
- Number of employees: Insufficient Data
- Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
- Product scope includes multiple electronic detection products, including stud finders, wall scanners, metal/AC detectors, and wire detection tools.
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a defined product focus in electronic detection tools, particularly wall scanners and stud finder-related products. The product listings show several related SKUs with different specifications and MOQ levels ranging from 1 piece to 500 pieces, suggesting some level of product organization and commercial readiness.
However, the most important production-scale indicators—factory area and employee count—are not available. Without these data points, it is not possible to confirm whether the supplier operates as a large-scale manufacturer, a medium-sized factory, or a smaller production-oriented supplier. The verified supplier status provides a positive signal, but it does not fully replace detailed factory capacity information.
Scoring Rationale
The company receives credit for having verified supplier status and a focused product category, which indicates basic operational legitimacy and some production or supply capability. However, the absence of factory area, employee count, and detailed production scale prevents a higher score. Based on the available information, the supplier can be assessed as having basic to moderate company strength, but not enough evidence supports classification as a large-scale or highly stable supply chain.
Final Score
12 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 21 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier / factory verification: True
- Platform tags provided: “Response time ≤1h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
Elaboration
The supplier has a very strong platform history, with 21 years as an Gold Supplier. This is a significant credibility indicator within the platform context. Trade Assurance availability further improves transaction security for buyers, as it provides a structured mechanism for order protection.
The supplier also has verified supplier status, which strengthens its compliance credibility. The listed platform tags confirm strong responsiveness and delivery performance. However, the provided certification or industry label information is limited to response time and delivery performance; no additional product certifications, management system certifications, or inspection-related labels are provided in the data.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs strongly in this dimension due to long-term Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. A 21-year Gold Supplier record is a major credibility advantage. The only reason the score is not at the absolute maximum is that the certification/industry label information is not comprehensive, and no additional compliance certificates are provided in the dataset.
Final Score
19 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in the past six months: 20+
- Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥202.8K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 7
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 20 orders and over CN¥202.8K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has recent commercial activity and is not inactive on the platform. The transaction amount is meaningful, though not enough to indicate a very high-volume supplier based only on the provided data.
The store rating of 5.0 is positive, but the number of reviews is limited at 7. This means the rating should be interpreted cautiously because the review base is relatively small. The supplier has demonstrated some market validation, but the available transaction and review data do not fully support classification as a high-volume or widely validated seller.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows stable but moderate business performance. The transaction value of CN¥202.8K+ and 20+ orders over six months demonstrate real purchasing activity, while the 5.0 rating is favorable. However, the relatively low review count limits the strength of customer validation. Therefore, the supplier fits the “stable medium-scale transaction” category rather than a high-order, high-review, high-volume supplier.
Final Score
14 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- Platform tag: “Response time ≤1h”
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong communication responsiveness, with a reported response time of no more than one hour. This is a positive service indicator, especially for buyers requiring fast quotation cycles, sample discussions, order confirmation, or after-sales communication.
However, the dataset does not provide information on whether the supplier supports Full Customization. There is also no provided evidence regarding OEM/ODM service scope, packaging customization, private labeling, engineering support, or product development capability. Therefore, while communication efficiency appears strong, customization depth cannot be confirmed.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier qualifies for a high service score due to the fast response time of ≤1 hour. However, because Full Customization support is not provided in the data, the score cannot reach the maximum level. The supplier appears suitable for buyers who value quick communication, but buyers requiring customized product development should verify customization capability separately.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
- Platform tag: “On-time delivery 100.0%”
Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery performance level under the scoring standard. This suggests that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has been able to ship orders according to agreed timelines.
This is especially important for buyers managing inventory cycles, marketplace replenishment, or project-based procurement. However, the data does not specify the number of shipments behind this rate, so while the rate itself is excellent, buyers should still monitor delivery performance during actual cooperation.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the full score for this dimension. No negative delivery indicators are provided in the dataset.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 7
- Verified supplier / factory verification: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Additional quality certifications: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is a positive signal for customer satisfaction. However, the review count is only 7, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. A small number of reviews may still reflect good customer experience, but it does not provide broad-based market confirmation.
The supplier’s verified status is a positive quality assurance indicator, as it suggests some level of third-party or platform-level verification. However, the dataset does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, formal quality management certifications, product compliance certifications, or detailed inspection procedures. Therefore, the quality system appears partially supported but not fully documented.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier deserves a moderate-to-good score due to the 5.0 rating and verified supplier status. However, the low review count and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection or additional quality system information prevent a higher score. The quality signal is positive but not yet strong enough to classify the supplier as having a fully mature and well-documented quality assurance system.
Final Score
15 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 12 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 19 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 14 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 8 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 10 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 15 / 20 |
| Total Score | 78 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Recommended for controlled cooperation, especially for small to medium-volume sourcing or trial orders.
Fuzhou Yu Xin Electronic Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, long-term presence, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, fast response time, and excellent reported delivery performance. These factors make the supplier suitable for buyers seeking electronic detection tools such as stud finders, wall scanners, metal/AC detectors, and related products.
Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium-sized importers
- Online sellers requiring ready-listed products
- Buyers looking for sample orders or low-to-medium MOQ procurement
- Procurement teams prioritizing platform protection and fast communication
Main risks:
- Factory area and employee count are not provided, so production scale is unclear.
- Finished Product Inspection information is not available.
- Review count is limited, with only 7 reviews despite a 5.0 rating.
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed.
Growth potential: The supplier has strong platform credibility and consistent delivery indicators. If it can provide more transparent factory capacity data, quality inspection records, and customization capability documentation, it could become more suitable for larger-volume or long-term procurement programs.
Leave your comment