Shanghai Jie Yu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shanghai Jie Yu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanghai, with a reported factory area of over 5,500㎡ and more than 20 staff. The company appears to be a specialized small-to-medium supplier with verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 9 years, Trade Assurance support, and platform tags including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Warranty available. Its recent business performance shows 60+ orders and CN¥1M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 5.0 store rating, although the review count is limited at 8. Delivery performance is strong, with a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. Based on the available data, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking relatively low-MOQ metal or precious-metal-related products with customization support. However, information on export markets, key customers, detailed factory certifications, and production capacity remains Insufficient Data.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Shanghai, China
- Factory area: 5,500+㎡
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a reported factory area exceeding 5,500㎡, which indicates a certain level of physical operating capacity. However, the employee count of 20+ staff suggests a relatively lean organization rather than a large-scale manufacturing workforce. The verified supplier status provides some basic confidence that the company has passed platform-level verification, but no additional factory audit details, production lines, annual capacity, or equipment data are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates more than basic production presence due to its factory area and verified supplier status. However, the limited staff size prevents it from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. Since detailed production scale and factory certification information are not available, the assessment should remain moderately conservative.

Final Score: 14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization

Elaboration:
The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 9 years, which indicates relatively long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support improves buyer protection during transaction execution. The listed platform tags also suggest the supplier provides inspection-related and customization-related services. However, there is no specific third-party management system certification, product compliance certificate, or industry-standard certification listed in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale:
A 9-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and multiple service and quality-related platform tags provide strong platform credibility. The score is high, but not perfect, because formal certification details beyond platform labels are Insufficient Data.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 60+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 8

Elaboration:
The supplier shows active recent commercial performance, with over 60 orders and more than CN¥1M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has some market traction and completed transactions on the platform. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review count of 8 is relatively limited, which means the rating sample size is not broad enough to fully validate long-term customer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale:
The order volume and transaction value support a stable mid-level business profile. However, the relatively low number of reviews reduces the strength of commercial validation. The supplier performs better than a low-activity seller but does not yet demonstrate the high-volume, high-review profile required for the top scoring range.

Final Score: 16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: listed
- ODM service available: listed

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a response time of within 2 hours, which is acceptable for B2B communication and suggests reasonable responsiveness. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service tags indicates that the supplier may support customized requirements. However, no detailed customization cases, engineering capacity, design team information, or sample development timeline are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has solid service capability due to fast response and customization-related platform tags. Since the response time is not within the ≤1 hour benchmark for the highest score range, and detailed customization execution data is Insufficient Data, the score remains in the upper-middle range.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is a strong indicator of delivery discipline on the platform. This suggests that, for recorded transactions, the supplier has met dispatch commitments effectively. No additional data is provided regarding average lead time, logistics regions, urgent order capability, or historical delay records.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier achieves the highest delivery score based on the available data.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 8
- Finished Product Inspection: listed
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating and includes Finished Product Inspection among its platform tags. Verified supplier status also provides some confidence in the company’s legitimacy and operational presence. However, the number of reviews is only 8, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. No detailed defect rate, inspection reports, product compliance certificates, or customer complaint history are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The available quality signals are positive, especially the 5.0 rating, Finished Product Inspection tag, and verified supplier status. Nevertheless, the low review count and absence of detailed quality documentation prevent the supplier from reaching the top score range. The quality profile appears good but not yet strongly validated by broad customer feedback.

Final Score: 16 / 20

Total Score

83 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled risk management. Shanghai Jie Yu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume procurement, low-MOQ orders, and customized metal or precious-metal-related products through Trade Assurance. The supplier’s main strengths are long platform history, verified status, strong delivery performance, and active recent transactions. Key risks include limited employee scale, low review count, and Insufficient Data on formal certifications, production capacity, export markets, and major customers. The supplier shows good growth potential if it can provide more quality documentation, factory audit details, and broader customer feedback.