zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Zhongshan Liang Shun Yu Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Zhongshan Liang Shun Yu Kitchenware Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based kitchenware supplier in China, positioned around stainless steel and kitchen sink products, including SUS 304 stainless steel sinks, handmade multifunction sinks, countertop kitchen sinks, and customized large-capacity stainless steel sink products. The company shows a solid manufacturing base with a reported factory area of over 16,000 m², more than 140 staff, and verified supplier status. On , it has 4 years as a Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and lists quality and service-related tags including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service, and warranty availability. Business activity appears moderate to strong, with 50+ orders and CN¥3.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, although the review count is limited at 7. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale to scalable kitchen sink sourcing with customization needs, while buyers should further verify quality consistency through samples, inspection reports, and order references.

Detailed Analysis

Zhongshan Liang Shun Yu Kitchenware Co., Ltd.

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 16,000+ m²
- Employees: 140+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope shown: stainless steel and kitchen sink-related products

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a tangible production foundation with a factory area exceeding 16,000 m² and more than 140 employees. This indicates a meaningful manufacturing scale rather than a small trading operation based only on storefront activity. The product listings are concentrated around kitchen sinks and stainless steel kitchenware, which suggests a relatively focused product category rather than an overly broad, unrelated assortment.

The verified supplier status further supports the existence and credibility of the production entity. However, the provided data does not include detailed information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, export history, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have a stable factory base, the assessment cannot classify it as a fully proven large-scale industrial supplier without additional production capacity evidence.

Scoring Rationale
The company fits the profile of a mid-sized stable manufacturer. The factory area and staff count are stronger than a small workshop, and verified supplier status adds credibility. However, the absence of detailed production capacity figures and formal factory certification data limits the score from reaching the highest band.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, Full customization, ODM service available

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively complete credibility profile. Four years as a Gold Supplier provides a reasonable operating history on the platform, while Trade Assurance offers buyers a platform-backed transaction mechanism. Verified supplier status further strengthens baseline credibility.

The listed tags also support procurement confidence. Finished Product Inspection is particularly relevant for quality control, while warranty availability provides an additional after-sales signal. Full Customization and ODM service available indicate that the supplier may support tailored product requirements, although the provided data does not specify engineering capability, design process, or customization case studies.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, 4-year tenure, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple relevant service and quality tags. The score is strong but not maximum because the Gold Supplier history is moderate rather than long-term, and no additional third-party compliance certificates are provided.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 50+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥3.2M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 7

Elaboration
The supplier shows meaningful recent commercial activity, with more than 50 orders and over CN¥3.2M in transactions during the past six months. This indicates that buyers are placing actual orders and that the supplier has some proven transaction momentum on the platform.

The store rating of 4.8 is positive and suggests buyer satisfaction among available reviewers. However, the review count is only 7, which is relatively limited compared with the transaction volume. This creates a verification gap: while order and transaction data are encouraging, the low number of public reviews makes it harder to assess consistency across multiple buyers and order scenarios.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction amount is solid and the order count is acceptable for a mid-scale supplier, supporting a stable business performance score. The high store rating is favorable, but the small review base prevents the supplier from being rated in the top performance tier.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: listed
- ODM service available: listed

Elaboration
The supplier’s stated response time of within 2 hours indicates a reasonably efficient communication process. This is suitable for standard sourcing inquiries, quotation follow-up, and order coordination. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service tags further supports service flexibility for buyers needing customized sink specifications or product adjustments.

However, the response time does not meet the strongest benchmark of within 1 hour. Also, the data does not provide details on English communication capability, project management process, sample lead time, design support, or customization workflow. Therefore, service capability appears good but not fully proven at a premium level.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates above-basic service capability due to relatively fast response time and customization-related platform tags. The score is not at the maximum level because response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, and detailed service execution data is insufficient.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 96.8%

Elaboration
A 96.8% on-time dispatch rate is a strong delivery indicator. It suggests that the supplier generally manages production scheduling, order preparation, and dispatch commitments effectively. For buyers sourcing kitchen sinks or stainless steel kitchenware, this is important because delays can affect project timelines, retail replenishment, or installation schedules.

The data only covers the on-time dispatch percentage and does not include average lead time, logistics method, late-shipment causes, or performance by order size. Even so, based strictly on the provided metric, delivery reliability appears strong.

Scoring Rationale
The on-time dispatch rate is above 90%, which places the supplier in the highest delivery performance band. A score near the top is justified, though not full marks because the data does not include broader logistics or lead-time consistency details.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 7
- Finished Product Inspection: listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: listed

Elaboration
The quality profile is positive but not fully conclusive. A 4.8 store rating indicates favorable customer feedback among existing reviewers, and Finished Product Inspection is a relevant quality assurance tag. Verified supplier status and warranty availability also strengthen the supplier’s quality credibility from a procurement perspective.

The main limitation is the low review count of 7. This means the rating is based on a relatively small public feedback sample, making it difficult to judge long-term consistency, defect rates, packaging quality, or after-sales issue handling. No specific inspection reports, defect statistics, product test results, or third-party quality certifications are provided.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has several positive quality signals, including a high rating, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and verified status. However, the limited number of reviews and lack of detailed inspection or certification records reduce confidence in quality consistency across larger or repeated orders.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

81 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled risk management.

This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking stainless steel kitchen sinks or related kitchenware products from a mid-sized Chinese manufacturer with customization capability, ODM availability, Trade Assurance support, and strong on-time dispatch performance. It may be appropriate for small to medium wholesalers, project-based buyers, online sellers, and distributors requiring moderate order quantities and product customization.

Key risk points include the limited public review count, insufficient detail on production capacity, lack of provided third-party factory certifications, and limited disclosed quality documentation beyond Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability. Before placing large-volume orders, buyers should request samples, confirm material specifications such as stainless steel grade, review inspection standards, clarify warranty terms, and use Trade Assurance for transaction protection.

The supplier shows good growth potential due to its factory scale, 4-year platform history, CN¥3.2M+ recent transaction value, customization tags, and 96.8% on-time dispatch rate. With stronger review accumulation and more transparent quality documentation, its procurement reliability could improve further.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Zhongshan Lanhua Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Lanhua Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taian Liang Teng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taian Liang Teng Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xin Liang Nian Agricultural Produce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xin Liang Nian Agricultural Produce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ciyu Kitchenware (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ciyu Kitchenware (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gaoya Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gaoya Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hugo Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Hugo Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Segong Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Segong Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shunling Refrigeration Kitchenware Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Shunling Refrigeration Kitchenware Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Adlone Kitchenware Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Adlone Kitchenware Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sha Yu Sports (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sha Yu Sports (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Yu Xin Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Yu Xin Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yu Mingjie Pigments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yu Mingjie Pigments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fa Yu Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Fa Yu Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yu Jiacheng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yu Jiacheng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yu. Pooling Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yu. Pooling Wisdom Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jie Yu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Jie Yu Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Dong Yu Doors And Windows Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Dong Yu Doors And Windows Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Lianchang Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Lianchang Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hongsheng Hardware Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hongsheng Hardware Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Hepu Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Hepu Lighting Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Huizhou Dahe Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Dahe Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hansha Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Hansha Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Langqing Electric Car Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Langqing Electric Car Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Chongfu Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Chongfu Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Liaocheng Jiuyang Steel Pipe Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Liaocheng Jiuyang Steel Pipe Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Success Flag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Success Flag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bayannaoer Weimei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bayannaoer Weimei Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Xinfeng Clothes-Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Xinfeng Clothes-Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chengjie Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chengjie Lighting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Shengwo Mechanical And Electrical Equipment Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Shengwo Mechanical And Electrical Equipment Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Manwei Brother Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Manwei Brother Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Glzon Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Glzon Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Lianhua Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Lianhua Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ruizhan Plastic Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ruizhan Plastic Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Umore Film Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Umore Film Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Michu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Michu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Rongta Technology ( Xiamen) Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Rongta Technology ( Xiamen) Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen First Stone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen First Stone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Qishen Plastic Industry Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qiandao Industrial (Hongkong) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Qiandao Industrial (Hongkong) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026