Huizhou Dahe Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Huizhou Dahe Industrial Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 9,600+㎡ and 100+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to have a moderate production foundation supported by verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 5 years, Trade Assurance, and a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Its listed products are mainly small appliance-related items such as mini humidifiers, small air purifiers, and portable household appliance products, with MOQ consistently at 500 pieces.

From a procurement perspective, the supplier is more suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale sourcing, controlled MOQ procurement, or product categories aligned with compact household appliances and air-related devices. However, the commercial validation is mixed: the supplier shows CN¥4.3M+ transaction value in the past six months but only 8 orders, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. Quality feedback data is therefore limited, and customization capability is not provided. Cooperation may be considered with sample validation, specification confirmation, and quality inspection safeguards.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 9,600+㎡
- Employees: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a reported factory area of more than 9,600 square meters and over 100 employees, which indicates a meaningful production base rather than a very small trading-only operation. The verified supplier status also provides a degree of operational credibility. However, the provided data does not include detailed production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, R&D team size, or factory audit documents beyond the verified supplier indicator.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates characteristics of a stable medium-sized factory. Its factory area and staffing level support basic-to-moderate production capability, while verified supplier status strengthens credibility. However, the available information is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale supply chain operation, because detailed production capacity and factory certification data are not provided.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / platform tags: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a 5-year Gold Supplier history and supports Trade Assurance, both of which are important platform credibility indicators. Verified supplier status further supports baseline compliance confidence. The available tags also highlight operational responsiveness and delivery performance. However, the data does not provide broader certification details, such as industry-specific certifications, factory audit reports, or product compliance certificates.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core platform trust elements: Gold Supplier status, 5-year history, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. This creates a relatively strong credibility profile. The score is not placed in the highest range because certification information is limited and no complete compliance documentation is provided.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 8
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥4.3M+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0

Elaboration
The supplier shows a relatively high transaction value of CN¥4.3M+ over the past six months, but this is supported by only 8 orders. This suggests that the supplier may have handled some higher-value transactions, but order frequency is limited. The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews reduce the strength of buyer-side commercial validation.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction amount is a positive indicator, but the low order count and lack of customer reviews prevent a high business performance score. The supplier has some commercial activity, but buyer feedback and repeat validation are not sufficiently visible from the provided data.

Final Score
13 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international procurement discussions. However, there is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, packaging customization, or design customization.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is commercially useful, but it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not provided, the service assessment must remain moderate rather than strong. The supplier appears responsive, but its ability to support complex buyer requirements cannot be confirmed.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery-related metric provided. This indicates that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has performed well in meeting shipment timelines.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension. No negative delivery indicators are provided.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory / supplier verification: True

Elaboration
The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some quality-related confidence at the company verification level. However, there is no available store rating, no customer reviews, and no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection. The absence of buyer feedback makes it difficult to assess consistency, defect rates, after-sales handling, or product satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier receives some credit for verified supplier status, but quality confidence is limited by the lack of rating data, 0 reviews, and no confirmed finished product inspection system. This creates a moderate-to-low quality feedback profile, requiring additional buyer-side due diligence before larger procurement commitments.

Final Score
11 / 20

Total Score

74 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Huizhou Dahe Industrial Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers sourcing compact household appliance-related products with moderate MOQ requirements and who value Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and strong reported delivery performance.

The supplier is best suited for small-to-medium importers, online retailers, distributors, or buyers testing product categories with controlled order quantities. Major risks include insufficient customer review data, no available store rating, unconfirmed customization capability, and no provided Finished Product Inspection evidence. Its growth potential lies in its verified production base, 5-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥4.3M+ recent transaction value, and 100.0% on-time delivery record. For larger orders, sample testing, specification confirmation, third-party inspection, and contract-based quality terms are recommended.