Pluscent Electrical(Huizhou) Limited Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Pluscent Electrical (Huizhou) Limited is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 10,000+ m² and 90+ staff. The company appears to have a moderate manufacturing base and is marked as a verified supplier, indicating a certain level of factory credibility. Its listed products focus on portable juicer cups and multifunctional kitchen juicer products, with a consistent MOQ of 500 pieces. On -related indicators, the supplier has 3 years as a Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance, which provides basic platform credibility. However, recent business validation is limited, with only 3 orders in the past six months, CN¥135.2K+ transaction value, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. Delivery performance is weak, with an on-time delivery rate of only 66.7%. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium trial orders, but not yet ideal for high-volume or time-sensitive procurement without further verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 10,000+ m²
- Employees: 90+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a documented physical production base with over 10,000 m² of factory area and more than 90 employees. This indicates a reasonable production foundation rather than a very small workshop-level operation. The verified supplier status also supports the existence of a basic factory verification layer.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates medium-scale manufacturing capability, supported by factory size, staff count, and verified supplier status. However, the staff scale is not large enough to classify it as a large-scale supply chain, and no additional factory certifications or audit details are provided beyond the verified supplier label.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Response time ≤3h; On-time delivery 66.7%
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has core platform credibility elements, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The 3-year Gold Supplier history suggests a moderate operating record on the platform, though it is not a long-established profile.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier meets several important platform credibility requirements, but the Gold Supplier duration is relatively short-to-moderate. The available certification labels are limited and do not show additional product certifications, factory certifications, or industry compliance documents. Therefore, credibility is acceptable but not comprehensive.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 3
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded transaction activity, but the number of recent orders is low. The transaction value of CN¥135.2K+ shows some commercial activity, yet the lack of store rating and customer reviews limits confidence in market acceptance and repeat buyer validation.

Scoring Rationale
Business performance is relatively weak because the order count is low and there are no customer reviews. While the transaction value prevents the supplier from being classified as commercially inactive, the absence of rating data and review volume means buyer-side validation is insufficient.

Final Score
10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization or other customized procurement services.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is positive but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since customization capability is not provided, service strength cannot be rated as high. The supplier appears suitable for standard inquiries and basic communication, but customization depth remains unverified.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 66.7%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is below 70%, which is a notable weakness for procurement planning. This may create risk for buyers with strict delivery schedules or seasonal sales windows.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, delivery performance below 70% should receive less than 5 points. The 66.7% rate indicates that delivery reliability is currently below an acceptable procurement benchmark.

Final Score
4 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification / Verified Supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some quality-related credibility at the factory level. However, there is no available store rating, no customer reviews, and no provided Finished Product Inspection information. This makes it difficult to assess actual product quality consistency from buyer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The absence of customer reviews and store rating significantly limits quality confidence. Verified supplier status is a positive factor, but it does not replace customer feedback or confirmed inspection systems. Therefore, the quality profile remains under-validated.

Final Score
9 / 20

Total Score

62 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small-to-medium trial orders, especially for buyers sourcing portable juicer or kitchen appliance products with a 500-piece MOQ. The supplier has a moderate factory base, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status, but major risks include weak delivery performance, low recent order volume, 0 reviews, missing store rating, and insufficient quality inspection data. Buyers should request product samples, inspection reports, delivery commitments, and quality control documentation before placing larger orders. Growth potential exists if the supplier improves on-time delivery and accumulates stronger customer feedback.