Yiwu Beauledo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yiwu Beauledo Garment Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang-based Chinese garment/accessory supplier with a reported factory area of 1,800+㎡ and 30+ staff. Based on the available data, the company appears to be a small-to-medium scale supplier with verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 4 years, Trade Assurance support, and several platform capability labels including Finished Product Inspection, 3D design capabilities, warranty availability, and social responsibility. Its recent performance is commercially meaningful, with 200+ orders and CN¥1.6M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating and 70+ reviews. The supplier also demonstrates good delivery performance with a 94.3% on-time shipment rate. It is most suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ garment or cap products, custom-logo items, and moderate-volume sourcing. Key limitations are its relatively small factory size, limited staff scale, and insufficient data on full customization capability and detailed production capacity.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company: Yiwu Beauledo Garment Co., Ltd.
• Location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 1,800+㎡
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined factory footprint and workforce, indicating that it has actual operating facilities rather than only a trading presence. A factory area of 1,800+㎡ and 30+ staff suggests a relatively compact production setup. This is sufficient for basic manufacturing, sample handling, small-batch orders, and moderate-volume production, but it does not indicate a large-scale industrial production base.

The presence of verified supplier status improves confidence in the legitimacy of the company’s operating background. However, the provided data does not include detailed production line quantity, monthly capacity, machinery list, export history, or factory audit reports beyond the verification indicator.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic and credible production capability with a physical factory and verified supplier status. However, the factory size and employee count are closer to a small-to-medium operation rather than a large-scale supply chain partner. Because production scale data is limited and no detailed capacity figures are provided, the company should not be scored in the high range for manufacturing strength.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / platform labels:
• Socially responsible
• 3D design capabilities
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. A 4-year Gold Supplier history shows an established presence on the platform, though it is not yet a very long-term supplier profile. Trade Assurance support provides additional transactional protection for buyers, which is particularly relevant for international procurement.

The supplier also has multiple capability and compliance-related labels. Finished Product Inspection is especially relevant to quality control, while warranty availability and social responsibility labels improve the overall credibility profile. The “3D design capabilities” label suggests some level of design-related support, although the scope and technical depth are not specified in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and several capability labels. The 4-year Gold Supplier duration is positive but not long enough to justify the maximum credibility score. Certification information is platform-label based, and no independent third-party certificates or detailed audit documents are provided.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 200+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.6M+
• Store rating: 4.6
• Review count: 70+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated active commercial performance on the platform. More than 200 orders in the past six months indicates consistent buyer activity, while CN¥1.6M+ in transaction value shows that the supplier is not only receiving small test orders but also generating meaningful sales volume.

The store rating of 4.6 is generally positive, though not at the very top level. A review base of 70+ provides some customer feedback validation, but it is not a very large review pool compared with highly mature, high-volume suppliers. Overall, the data reflects a commercially active supplier with moderate-to-strong transaction validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s recent order count and transaction value are solid, supporting a positive assessment of business performance. However, the score is moderated because the store rating is 4.6 rather than exceptionally high, and the review count, while useful, is still moderate. The business performance appears stable and credible, but not yet at the level of a top-tier, high-volume platform supplier.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• 3D design capabilities: listed under platform labels
• Custom-logo products are shown in the product information
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. This is suitable for buyers who require regular pre-sales communication, sample discussions, quotation adjustments, and order follow-up.

The product list includes custom-logo cap products, and the supplier has a “3D design capabilities” label. These data points suggest that some customization-related service may be available. However, the provided information does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization,” nor does it specify customization scope such as materials, structure, patterns, private labeling, packaging, or OEM/ODM depth.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs well on response speed but does not meet the highest service scoring level because the response time is not within 1 hour and full customization capability is not explicitly confirmed. The available data supports a conclusion of normal-to-good service capability with some customization signals, but not a fully verified advanced customization service system.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 94.3%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time shipment rate of 94.3% is strong and exceeds the 90% benchmark for high delivery reliability. This suggests that the supplier is generally capable of meeting agreed dispatch schedules and managing order fulfillment timelines effectively.

For procurement buyers, this delivery metric is important because delays can affect inventory planning, marketplace launch schedules, and seasonal sales windows. A rate above 90% supports confidence in the supplier’s delivery discipline.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. The supplier’s 94.3% performance is clearly within this high-performance bracket. A perfect score is not assigned because the rate is below near-perfect levels and no additional delivery details are provided, such as average lead time, urgent order handling, or historical delay causes.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.6
• Review count: 70+
• Finished Product Inspection: listed
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Warranty available: listed

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive but not exceptional store rating of 4.6, supported by 70+ reviews. This indicates a reasonable level of customer satisfaction and provides some basis for evaluating buyer feedback. The review count is sufficient to show transaction history but is not large enough to represent broad market validation.

Quality control credibility is strengthened by the Finished Product Inspection label, which indicates that finished goods inspection is part of the supplier’s stated capability profile. Factory verification also supports basic confidence in the supplier’s operational legitimacy. Warranty availability further adds to the quality assurance framework, although the specific warranty terms are not provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has several quality-related positives: good rating, moderate review count, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verification. However, the score is not in the top range because the rating is not exceptionally high, the review base is moderate rather than extensive, and detailed quality system certifications or inspection procedures are not provided. The quality profile is credible but not fully comprehensive.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Yiwu Beauledo Garment Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ garment or cap-related products, especially buyers who value Trade Assurance, moderate customization signals, responsive communication, and proven recent transaction activity. The supplier’s 200+ orders and CN¥1.6M+ transaction value over the past six months provide meaningful commercial validation, while its 94.3% on-time shipment rate supports reliable delivery performance.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium-sized importers
- E-commerce sellers
- Buyers requiring low MOQ sourcing
- Buyers seeking custom-logo cap or garment-related products
- Buyers who prefer suppliers with Trade Assurance and verified platform status

Main risks:
- Factory scale is limited, with 1,800+㎡ and 30+ staff
- Full customization capability is not explicitly confirmed
- Detailed production capacity, machinery, lead time, and audit documentation are not provided
- Review count is moderate rather than extensive

Growth potential:
The supplier shows positive growth indicators through active platform sales, solid transaction value, good delivery performance, and platform-backed inspection and warranty labels. With stronger disclosure of production capacity, customization scope, and quality control procedures, the supplier could become more attractive for larger or more demanding procurement programs.