zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Yiwu Ai Xue Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Yiwu Ai Xue Garment Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang, China-based garment/accessory supplier with a reported factory area of 3,200+㎡ and 40+ staff. The company appears positioned as a small-to-mid-sized manufacturer with verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 8 years, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels including low MOQ customization, warranty availability, and ODM service availability. Its listed products are mainly beret and women’s/girls’ fashion accessory-related items, with MOQs ranging from 5 to 500 pieces, suggesting flexibility for both small-batch and wholesale procurement. Business performance is relatively solid, with 200+ orders and CN¥2.4M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 4.7 store rating and 90+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 97.9% on-time shipping rate. However, employee scale is limited, response time is moderate at ≤3h, and no Finished Product Inspection information is provided. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking flexible MOQ fashion accessory sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection.

Yiwu Ai Xue Garment Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Yiwu Ai Xue Garment Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Zhejiang, China
  • Factory area: 3,200+㎡
  • Employees: 40+ staff
  • Verified supplier/factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier operates from a reported factory area of over 3,200 square meters with more than 40 staff members. This indicates an established physical production base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The presence of verified supplier status improves confidence in the company’s operational legitimacy. However, the workforce size remains relatively modest, and the available data does not indicate large-scale automation, production lines, monthly output capacity, or major factory certifications beyond supplier verification.

The company’s product listings show multiple beret/fashion accessory items with varied MOQ levels, including low minimum quantities. This suggests a degree of operational flexibility, especially for small and medium buyers. However, based strictly on the data provided, the company should be considered a small-to-mid-sized manufacturer rather than a large-scale industrial supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The company has a meaningful factory footprint and verified supplier status, which supports basic manufacturing credibility. The 3,200+㎡ facility is adequate for stable small-to-medium production, and 40+ staff indicates operational capability. However, the staff count is not large, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, machinery, annual output, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, it does not qualify as a large-scale stable supply chain under the highest scoring band, but it fits well within the mid-level stable factory category.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier/factory audit: True
  • Certification/industry labels:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Warranty available
  • ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has an 8-year Gold Supplier history, which is a positive indicator of platform continuity. Trade Assurance is supported, providing buyers with transaction protection through the platform. The supplier is also marked as verified, which strengthens platform credibility. The available certification/industry labels indicate support for low MOQ customization, warranty availability, and ODM service availability.

However, the provided data does not include internationally recognized compliance certifications, such as ISO, BSCI, Sedex, OEKO-TEX, or other garment-related social or product compliance credentials. Therefore, while platform credibility is strong, broader third-party compliance depth cannot be confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

An 8-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status represent a strong platform credibility foundation. These elements reduce buyer-side transaction risk and indicate a relatively mature presence. The certification labels are useful but are more service/platform tags than comprehensive compliance certifications. Because core credibility indicators are complete and the supplier has a long platform history, the score is high, but not full due to insufficient data on independent compliance certifications.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 200+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.4M+
  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Review count: 90+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved more than 200 orders over the past six months and a transaction value exceeding CN¥2.4M. This indicates active commercial performance and market acceptance on the platform. A 4.7 store rating is generally positive, and 90+ reviews provide a meaningful customer feedback base, though not a very large review volume compared with top-tier high-traffic suppliers.

The combination of order volume and transaction value suggests the supplier is not merely newly listed or inactive. It has demonstrated consistent transactional activity. However, the data does not provide repeat buyer ratio, dispute rate, refund rate, buyer country distribution, or order size segmentation, so deeper commercial stability cannot be fully assessed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows solid short-term commercial validation, with 200+ recent orders and CN¥2.4M+ transaction value. These figures support a stable mid-to-strong business performance profile. The 4.7 rating is positive, though not exceptional, and the 90+ review count is enough to support credibility but not enough to classify the supplier as having very high-volume customer validation. Therefore, the supplier falls into the upper range of stable medium-scale transaction performance.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Platform labels:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • ODM service available
  • Warranty available
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is reported as within 3 hours, which is acceptable for international sourcing communication but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. The presence of “Low MOQ for customization” and “ODM service available” indicates some customization and product development capability. Warranty availability may also support after-sales service confidence.

However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. It also does not provide information on sample lead time, dedicated sales support, multilingual communication, design support, technical documentation, or private label packaging capability. As a result, service capability appears functional and commercially usable, but not fully proven as advanced.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates reasonable service responsiveness and some customization-related capabilities through platform labels. The ≤3h response time is acceptable, but not in the top service tier. Since Full Customization is not confirmed, the score should not reach the 9–10 range. The supplier fits the 6–8 band because it has normal responsiveness and basic customization/ODM indicators.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time shipping rate: 97.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time shipping rate is 97.9%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the highest performance band. This suggests that the supplier has been able to maintain reliable dispatch timing across its platform transactions.

However, the data does not include average production lead time, shipping methods, peak-season delivery stability, or late shipment dispute records. Therefore, the assessment is limited to the provided on-time shipment rate only.

Scoring Rationale

A 97.9% on-time shipping rate is clearly above the 90% threshold for top-tier delivery scoring. This indicates strong delivery discipline and reliable order fulfillment based on available platform data. Since no additional negative delivery indicators are provided, the supplier deserves a high score in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.7
  • Review count: 90+
  • Verified supplier/factory audit: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.7 store rating and more than 90 reviews, showing generally positive customer feedback. The verified supplier/factory audit status adds confidence that the company has passed some level of platform verification. This supports basic quality and operational credibility.

However, the data does not indicate whether Finished Product Inspection is available. There is also no information on defect rates, quality control procedures, in-line inspection, pre-shipment inspection, third-party inspection acceptance, material testing, or product compliance certifications. Therefore, while customer feedback is favorable, the quality assurance system cannot be considered fully transparent or comprehensive based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The 4.7 rating and 90+ reviews indicate a good customer satisfaction level, and factory verification improves credibility. However, the review volume is moderate rather than extensive, and the absence of Finished Product Inspection information limits confidence in systematic quality assurance. This places the supplier in the “good rating with basic quality assurance” range rather than the top “high rating, large review volume, and complete inspection system” category.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 18 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 81 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Yiwu Ai Xue Garment Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking fashion accessory products, especially beret-related items, with flexible MOQ options and platform-backed transaction protection. The supplier is particularly appropriate for small-to-medium importers, online retailers, boutique brands, promotional buyers, and wholesalers requiring moderate-volume sourcing with customization or ODM-related support.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium-sized fashion accessory buyers
- E-commerce sellers requiring low MOQ options
- Buyers seeking Trade Assurance protection
- Wholesalers looking for moderate-volume beret or garment accessory sourcing
- Brands needing basic ODM or customization support, subject to sample confirmation

Main risks:
- Full Customization capability is not explicitly confirmed.
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided.
- Workforce size is relatively limited at 40+ staff, which may restrict scalability for very large orders.
- No independent compliance certifications are provided in the data.
- Quality control depth beyond factory verification is unclear.

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong platform credibility, active transaction performance, and excellent delivery reliability. With 8 years as a Gold Supplier, 200+ recent orders, CN¥2.4M+ recent transaction value, and a 97.9% on-time shipping rate, it demonstrates solid commercial maturity. If the company can provide clearer quality inspection procedures, additional compliance certifications, and stronger customization documentation, it could become more suitable for larger or more compliance-sensitive buyers.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Yiwu Zhengpai Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhengpai Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gathertop Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gathertop Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yiti Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yiti Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Beauledo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Beauledo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Warhorse Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Warhorse Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Kamu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Kamu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jincong Garment Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jincong Garment Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi East Ai Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi East Ai Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ai-Mich Science And Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ai-Mich Science And Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ai Si Yun Anti-Counterfeiting Technology Development Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ai Si Yun Anti-Counterfeiting Technology Development Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Binyang Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Binyang Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianzi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianzi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Feitong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Feitong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jindijia Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jindijia Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Nidu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Nidu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Lianteng Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Lianteng Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhangjiagang Wilford Thermal Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang Wilford Thermal Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Guikang Stationery & Gifts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Guikang Stationery & Gifts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Winchoice Imp/Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Winchoice Imp/Exp Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Ruidong Weaving Fabric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Ruidong Weaving Fabric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fu Shi Fa Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fu Shi Fa Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Skyjade Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Skyjade Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Biyou Handbag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Biyou Handbag Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui He He New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui He He New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wucheng Henghe Vehicle Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wucheng Henghe Vehicle Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sheng Zhu Daily Pigments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sheng Zhu Daily Pigments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Beilunjubang Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Beilunjubang Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Topbright Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Topbright Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xzj Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xzj Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Ronsun Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Ronsun Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Xingyan Interlining Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Xingyan Interlining Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Gelee Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Gelee Sports Goods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Licheng Tools, Co, Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Licheng Tools, Co, Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huanshan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Huanshan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Champion Home Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Champion Home Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Brave Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Brave Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026