Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report: Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. is a China-based garment supplier located in Henan, with a reported factory area of over 23,000㎡ and more than 110 staff. The company appears to operate as a mid-sized apparel manufacturer with verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 2 years, Trade Assurance support, finished product inspection, and a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Its product portfolio in the provided data focuses on men’s summer casual apparel, including T-shirts and short-sleeved garments, with low minimum order quantities ranging from 2 to 100 pieces.

Commercially, the supplier has recorded 300+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.4 store rating and 100+ reviews. This indicates moderate marketplace validation. The supplier is suitable for small to medium buyers, online retailers, and test-order procurement requiring low MOQ and stable delivery. Key limitations include relatively short Gold Supplier history and limited disclosed information on full customization capability.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd.
• Country: China
• Factory location: Henan
• Factory area: 23,000+㎡
• Staff size: 110+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area exceeding 23,000㎡, which suggests a meaningful physical production base for garment manufacturing. A workforce of more than 110 employees indicates that the company is beyond a micro-scale operation and has a basic organizational structure to support production, order handling, and operational continuity.

The presence of verified supplier status further strengthens the supplier’s company profile, as it provides some level of external platform-backed credibility regarding the company’s existence and operational information. However, the provided data does not include details such as annual production capacity, number of production lines, machinery list, export history, or internationally recognized factory certifications. Therefore, the company strength assessment should remain within the scope of a medium-sized, operationally established supplier rather than a large-scale global supply chain manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid basic manufacturing strength through a sizable factory footprint and a workforce of over 110 staff. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the factory profile. However, because the data does not disclose detailed production capacity, equipment scale, factory audit reports, or third-party factory certifications beyond the verified supplier indication, it does not fully qualify as a large-scale, highly transparent supply chain partner.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / platform labels:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Finished product inspection
• On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements provide buyers with a more structured procurement environment, especially for payment protection and platform-based transaction monitoring.

The Gold Supplier duration is 2 years, which shows that the company has established a presence on the platform but does not yet represent a long operating history on . The supplier also carries relevant operational labels, including finished product inspection and on-time delivery performance. These labels improve platform credibility, particularly for buyers who prioritize transaction security and quality control visibility.

However, the data does not provide additional compliance certificates, factory audit documentation, social compliance certifications, product safety certifications, or internationally recognized management system certifications. Therefore, the supplier’s credibility is positive but still mainly platform-based.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and relevant operating labels. The main limitation is that the Gold Supplier history is relatively short at 2 years, and no broader compliance certifications are provided in the data. This supports a score in the “core certifications available but shorter track record” range rather than the highest credibility tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
• Store rating: 4.4
• Number of reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved more than 300 orders in the past six months, which indicates active marketplace performance and a consistent level of buyer engagement. A transaction value of CN¥135.2K+ over the same period reflects measurable commercial activity, although the value is not exceptionally high when compared with larger-scale suppliers.

The store rating of 4.4 is generally acceptable, but it is not at the very high-performance level of 4.8 or above. The presence of 100+ reviews provides a reasonable feedback base and helps validate that the supplier has served multiple buyers. Overall, the business data suggests stable low-to-mid volume platform trading rather than high-volume, high-value commercial dominance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a meaningful number of recent orders and a reasonable review base, which indicates that it is commercially active and has some buyer validation. However, the transaction value is moderate, and the 4.4 store rating suggests there may be some room for improvement in buyer satisfaction, consistency, or service experience. Based strictly on the provided data, the supplier fits the stable medium-scale trading category.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤5h
• Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 5 hours is acceptable for online sourcing and indicates that buyers can expect communication within a practical timeframe. This is suitable for regular product inquiries, sample discussions, MOQ confirmation, and order follow-up.

The platform label “Low MOQ for customization” suggests that the supplier may support some level of customization at relatively accessible order quantities. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization,” nor does it specify available customization types such as fabric, pattern, label, packaging, printing, embroidery, or private-label development. Therefore, customization strength cannot be evaluated beyond the provided low-MOQ customization label.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a normal response speed and some indication of customization support through the low MOQ customization label. However, since response time is not within one hour and there is no explicit confirmation of full customization capability, it does not meet the highest service capability level. The service profile is adequate for standard procurement and light customization, but information is insufficient to confirm advanced customization support.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
• Platform label: On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery performance indicator in the provided data. For apparel buyers, on-time shipment is especially important for seasonal products such as summer T-shirts and short-sleeved garments, where missed delivery windows can directly affect sales timing.

The on-time delivery label also appears within the supplier’s platform certification or performance tags, reinforcing the delivery performance data. However, the data does not specify the number of shipments used to calculate this rate, the delivery periods involved, or whether performance differs by product category or order size.

Scoring Rationale

According to the stated scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, the supplier earns the maximum score for this dimension. The score is based solely on the provided delivery metric.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.4
• Reviews: 100+
• Finished product inspection: Present as platform label
• Verified supplier: True
• Factory Verification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.4 and more than 100 reviews. This provides a meaningful customer feedback base and indicates that the supplier has accumulated marketplace experience. The rating is positive but not exceptional, so it supports confidence at a moderate level rather than indicating premium buyer satisfaction.

The “Finished product inspection” label is a relevant quality control indicator. It suggests that completed goods are subject to some inspection process before shipment. Verified supplier status also adds credibility to the company profile. However, the data does not include detailed quality control procedures, inspection standards, defect rate, sample approval process, third-party inspection history, or factory verification documents beyond the stated verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a reasonable quality assurance foundation due to finished product inspection, verified supplier status, 100+ reviews, and a 4.4 rating. However, the rating is not high enough to justify a top-tier quality score, and detailed quality system information is limited. Therefore, the supplier fits the category of good but not fully comprehensive quality validation.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ men’s casual summer apparel, especially small to medium-sized importers, online retailers, boutique sellers, and buyers conducting trial orders. The supplier’s strengths include a sizable factory area, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 300+ recent orders, finished product inspection, and a reported 100.0% on-time delivery rate.

The main risks are the relatively short 2-year Gold Supplier history, moderate transaction value, a store rating of 4.4 rather than a higher premium rating, and insufficient data regarding full customization capability, detailed factory certification, production capacity, and quality control depth.

For procurement use, buyers should begin with sample orders or small batch trial orders, confirm customization scope in writing, and use Trade Assurance for payment protection. The supplier shows good growth potential for low-MOQ garment sourcing if it continues improving buyer satisfaction, platform transaction scale, and quality documentation transparency.