zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based garment supplier focused on custom men’s shirts and flannel-style apparel, with listed products showing low MOQs of 2 pieces and price ranges mainly between CN¥42.13 and CN¥62.95. Based on the provided data, the company operates with a factory area of 3,000+㎡ and 50+ staff, indicating a small-to-medium production setup rather than a large-scale manufacturing base. The supplier has Gold Supplier status for 2 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a reasonable level of platform credibility. Its recent commercial activity is moderate, with 80+ orders and CN¥270.4K+ transaction value over the past six months. The 4.8 store rating is positive, but the review count is limited at 8. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking flexible, low-MOQ custom men’s casual shirts, but larger-volume buyers should further verify production capacity, quality inspection process, and customization workflow before placing major orders.

Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Company: Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 3,000+㎡
  • Employees: 50+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a declared factory area of over 3,000㎡ and more than 50 staff. This indicates an established physical production base with basic manufacturing capacity. The company is not presented as a very large factory, but the scale is sufficient for small-to-medium garment production requirements. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic operational profile of the company.

However, the provided data does not include detailed production lines, monthly capacity, machinery list, factory audit reports, or formal manufacturing certifications. Therefore, while the company demonstrates basic factory strength, the available data is insufficient to classify it as a large-scale or highly mature manufacturing operation.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size and employee count place the supplier in the small-to-medium category. The verified supplier status supports operational credibility, but the absence of detailed production capacity and factory certification data limits the score. The company appears capable of handling flexible apparel orders, but there is not enough evidence to confirm large-scale stable supply chain capability.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / platform labels: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 95.7%”
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has core platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These factors provide buyers with a basic level of transaction protection and platform-based trust. The 2-year Gold Supplier history indicates that the company has some platform operating history, though it is not yet long-term compared with suppliers with many years of platform presence.

The listed platform labels highlight response time and delivery performance, but no additional compliance certifications, product certifications, or industry-specific certificates are provided. Therefore, the compliance profile is acceptable at the platform level, but not comprehensive from a broader procurement compliance perspective.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the main trust mechanisms: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. However, the Gold Supplier period is relatively short at 2 years, and the provided certification label set is limited. This supports a solid but not top-tier platform credibility score.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Past 6-month orders: 80+
  • Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥270.4K+
  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Number of reviews: 8

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 80 orders in the past six months, showing measurable recent business activity. The transaction value of CN¥270.4K+ indicates that the supplier is generating active platform sales, though the scale is moderate rather than high-volume. A store rating of 4.8 is positive and suggests generally satisfactory customer experience among reviewed buyers.

However, the review count is only 8, which limits the reliability of the rating as a broad market validation indicator. The number of reviews is relatively low compared with the order count, meaning the public feedback base is limited. As a result, the business performance appears stable but not strongly proven by extensive customer feedback.

Scoring Rationale

The company shows moderate commercial traction with 80+ recent orders and CN¥270.4K+ in transaction value. The 4.8 rating is favorable, but the low review volume prevents the supplier from being classified as highly validated. The score reflects stable but still developing business performance.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤4h
  • Product listings include multiple custom men’s shirt/flannel products
  • Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within 4 hours, which suggests acceptable communication efficiency for online procurement. The listed product names repeatedly include “custom,” indicating that the supplier offers custom-style apparel products. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” capability, design support, private label service, sample development workflow, or OEM/ODM structure.

Because Full Customization is not directly confirmed in the provided supplier data, it cannot be treated as verified. The service capability is therefore assessed as functional but not fully documented.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤4h is reasonable, but it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. Custom-related product listings suggest some level of customization offering, but Full Customization is not explicitly evidenced. Therefore, the supplier receives a mid-level service score.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 95.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 95.7%, which is above the 90% threshold for strong delivery performance. This indicates that, based on the provided platform data, the supplier has demonstrated good shipment reliability.

No additional delivery details are provided, such as average lead time, production lead time by order size, shipping methods, or late shipment dispute history. However, the available delivery metric is strong and directly supports a high score in this dimension.

Scoring Rationale

With an on-time delivery rate of 95.7%, the supplier falls clearly within the highest scoring range for delivery performance. The score reflects strong punctuality based on the provided data, while recognizing that broader logistics details are not available.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Number of reviews: 8
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Supplier is marked as verified

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.8, which is a positive quality and customer satisfaction signal. The verified supplier status also provides some assurance regarding company legitimacy and basic factory profile. However, the number of reviews is only 8, which limits the statistical reliability of the customer feedback.

There is no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, third-party quality inspection reports, product testing standards, or formal quality management certifications. Therefore, while the rating is favorable, the quality assurance system cannot be considered fully proven based on the available data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier benefits from a high rating and verified supplier status, but the small review base and lack of explicit Finished Product Inspection data reduce the confidence level. The quality profile is acceptable for preliminary cooperation, but buyers should conduct sample checks or request inspection procedures before scaling orders.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 15 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking low-MOQ custom men’s shirts, flannel shirts, plaid shirts, and casual streetwear-style apparel. The supplier is particularly suitable for small brands, test orders, boutique apparel sellers, and buyers requiring flexible order quantities, as the listed MOQ is only 2 pieces across the provided products.

The main strengths are its verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, reasonable credibility, positive 4.8 rating, moderate recent order activity, and strong 95.7% on-time delivery performance.

Key risks include the limited review count, lack of explicit Finished Product Inspection data, insufficient information on Full Customization capability, and absence of detailed production capacity or factory certification data. For larger procurement programs, buyers should request samples, confirm customization scope, verify inspection procedures, and evaluate production lead time before bulk purchasing.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential as a flexible custom garment supplier, but major orders should proceed only after additional quality and capacity verification.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Dongguan Binyang Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Binyang Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Feitong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Feitong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ruisheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ruisheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longna Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longna Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Designeroon Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Designeroon Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Sunrise Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Sunrise Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Taisheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Taisheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hongzhiyue Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hongzhiyue Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jiasheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jiasheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Rainbow Spray Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Rainbow Spray Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuner Duoduo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yuner Duoduo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Meilan Medical Devices Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Meilan Medical Devices Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Meilan Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Meilan Communication Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhengpai Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhengpai Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gathertop Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gathertop Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shen Zhen Junsheng Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shen Zhen Junsheng Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Huizhou Xinyifeng Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Xinyifeng Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Comstar Office Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Comstar Office Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhongzhe Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zhongzhe Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aiifar Electronic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Aiifar Electronic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changxing Ruiyuan Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changxing Ruiyuan Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Vipoo Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Vipoo Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Yongkeng Electric & Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangmen Yongkeng Electric & Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Jindu Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Jindu Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Ing Tiger Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Ing Tiger Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Colorfly Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Colorfly Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Alwaycare Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Alwaycare Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yihua Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yihua Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Jufa Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Jufa Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Haochang Wire Mesh Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Haochang Wire Mesh Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
The Colors World Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
The Colors World Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yujing Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yujing Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianchang Trump Electronics Factory Supplier Evaluation
Tianchang Trump Electronics Factory Supplier Evaluation
Danyang Tenyu Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Danyang Tenyu Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Melors Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Melors Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Jincang Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Jincang Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026