zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Dongguan Yuner Duoduo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Dongguan Yuner Duoduo Garment Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based garment supplier focused on women’s business shirts, workwear tops, and long-sleeved women’s apparel. Based on the provided data, the company operates a relatively small production base of 800+ sqm with 20+ staff, but it has supplier verification and active platform credibility, including 3 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. Its recent business performance is relatively solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.6 store rating and 100+ reviews. The supplier appears suitable for small to medium-sized buyers seeking low-MOQ women’s apparel sourcing, sample testing, or flexible batch purchasing. Key strengths include verified platform status, low MOQ of 2 sets, acceptable customer feedback, and strong on-time delivery at 95.0%. Main limitations are the small factory scale and insufficient data on customization capability, finished product inspection, and broader quality management systems.

Dongguan Yuner Duoduo Garment Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 800+ sqm
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a physical production base in Guangdong, a major garment manufacturing region in China. However, the declared factory size of 800+ sqm and 20+ staff indicates a small-scale operation rather than a large industrial garment manufacturer. The presence of supplier verification improves confidence that the company has a verifiable business and production presence.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic production capability and some credibility through supplier verification. However, the limited factory area and employee count suggest constrained production capacity, especially for large-volume or complex multi-style orders. It is more appropriate for small-batch, low-MOQ, or moderate-volume procurement rather than high-volume retail programs.

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: Verified supplier
- Platform tags: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 95.0%”

Elaboration
The supplier has a visible credibility foundation, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. A 3-year Gold Supplier history provides a moderate platform track record, though it is not yet long-term compared with suppliers that have significantly longer histories. The available platform tags support basic operational transparency around response speed and delivery reliability.

Scoring Rationale
Core platform credibility indicators are present: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. These reduce transaction risk for buyers using ’s platform mechanisms. However, the provided data does not show additional compliance certifications, industry certifications, or a detailed factory audit report beyond the verified supplier label.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past six months: 300+
- Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥338K+
- Store rating: 4.6
- Number of reviews: 100+

Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated measurable commercial activity over the past six months. More than 300 orders indicates active buyer demand, while CN¥338K+ in transaction value suggests a stable but not large-scale transaction base. The 4.6 rating and 100+ reviews provide a reasonable level of market validation.

Scoring Rationale
The order volume is relatively strong for a small garment supplier, and the review base is sufficient to show recurring customer activity. However, the transaction value is moderate, and the 4.6 rating is good but not exceptionally high. This supports a stable mid-level business performance score rather than a top-tier rating.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤2h indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online sourcing and early-stage quotation discussions. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM/ODM development, label customization, fabric customization, or design modification services.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is positive, but it does not meet the highest service benchmark of ≤1h. More importantly, customization capability is not provided, which limits the ability to assess whether the supplier can support private-label or design-driven buyers. The service capability is therefore rated as adequate but not strongly proven.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 95.0%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 95.0% is a strong operational indicator. For apparel sourcing, delivery reliability is important because delays can affect seasonal launches, marketplace selling windows, and inventory planning.

Scoring Rationale
A 95.0% on-time delivery rate exceeds the 90% threshold for a high delivery performance score. This suggests the supplier has good order execution discipline based on the provided platform data. No additional logistics or lead-time data was provided, so the score is based strictly on the on-time delivery percentage.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.6
- Reviews: 100+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Supplier verification provided, but detailed factory audit scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive customer feedback profile, with a 4.6 rating and 100+ reviews. This indicates a reasonable level of buyer satisfaction and product acceptance. Supplier verification also adds some confidence, but the provided data does not confirm whether finished product inspection, formal QC procedures, third-party inspection, or specific garment quality certifications are in place.

Scoring Rationale
The rating and review volume support a good baseline quality perception. However, the absence of explicit Finished Product Inspection data limits confidence in systematic quality control. The supplier is suitable for buyers who can conduct sample approval and pre-shipment inspection, but the quality assurance system is not sufficiently documented for a top-tier score.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

75 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled risk management. Dongguan Yuner Duoduo Garment Co., Ltd. is suitable for small to medium-sized buyers sourcing women’s shirts, business-style tops, workwear shirts, and low-MOQ apparel orders. The supplier is especially relevant for buyers who value low minimum order quantities, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and relatively strong delivery performance.

Main risk points include limited factory scale, small workforce size, insufficient data on Full Customization, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality control systems. Buyers should request samples, confirm fabric and workmanship standards, clarify customization capability, and consider pre-shipment inspection before placing larger orders.

Growth potential exists if the supplier can maintain its order activity, improve documented quality assurance, and provide clearer customization and factory audit information. Overall, it is a practical sourcing option for flexible garment procurement, but not yet a fully proven large-scale strategic supplier.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Dongguan Binyang Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Binyang Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Feitong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Feitong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meilan Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ruisheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Ruisheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longna Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longna Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Designeroon Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Designeroon Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Sunrise Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Sunrise Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Taisheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Taisheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hongzhiyue Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Hongzhiyue Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jiasheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jiasheng Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Rainbow Spray Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Rainbow Spray Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhengpai Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhengpai Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gathertop Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gathertop Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianzi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianzi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jindijia Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jindijia Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cerrnss New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Cerrnss New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Suzhou Forst Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Forst Filter Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jiqian Fiber Optic Cable Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jiqian Fiber Optic Cable Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Youmay Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Youmay Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Yimei Environment Project Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Yimei Environment Project Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Green Protect Decoration  Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Green Protect Decoration Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Runhuabang New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Runhuabang New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Zhengda Daily Use Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Zhengda Daily Use Commodity Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Shengrun New Material Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Shengrun New Material Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Jinsumei Environmental Protection Plastic Product Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Jinsumei Environmental Protection Plastic Product Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Highrise Lift Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Highrise Lift Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Chaoyin Office Consumables Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Chaoyin Office Consumables Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huazhao High-Tech (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huazhao High-Tech (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Chiming Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Chiming Rubber Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yiyuan Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yiyuan Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hk Feitong International Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hk Feitong International Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Meiyi Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yangzhou Meiyi Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tong Wei Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tong Wei Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Saifu Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Saifu Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ebest Digital Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ebest Digital Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kelrosa Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Kelrosa Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026