Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

SHUNRI GARMENT LIMITED is a Hong Kong-registered garment supplier with a reported factory scale of 8,500+ sqm and 160+ staff, indicating a mid-sized production setup with basic-to-stable manufacturing capacity. The supplier is marked as a verified supplier and holds Gold Supplier status for 2 years, with Trade Assurance enabled. Its platform profile includes Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service availability, and Minor Customization, which supports a reasonable compliance and service foundation. Business validation is still limited: the supplier recorded 9 orders and CN¥13.5K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 5.0 store rating but only 1 review. Delivery performance is moderate, with a 75.0% on-time shipping rate. Overall, this supplier appears more suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ garment sourcing, sampling, small-batch customization, or early-stage cooperation, while larger buyers should further verify production consistency, delivery reliability, and customer feedback depth before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 8,500+ sqm
- Employees: 160+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Country code: HK
- Factory province: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The reported factory area and workforce indicate a supplier with a tangible production base rather than a very small trading profile. A scale of 8,500+ sqm and 160+ employees suggests the company has basic operational depth to support garment production activities. The verified supplier status further strengthens the credibility of the company’s stated operational presence. However, the data does not provide details on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, factory location province, or audit scope, so the actual production scalability cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier fits the “medium stable factory” range because the factory area and employee count are meaningful, and verified supplier status supports basic confidence. However, it does not reach the top scoring band because the dataset lacks detailed production capacity, audit documentation, factory certification names, or evidence of large-scale supply chain stability.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Finished product inspection, Full customization, ODM service available, Minor customization

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. These elements provide a basic platform-backed trust framework for buyers. The presence of operational tags such as Finished Product Inspection and customization-related services also improves the completeness of the supplier profile. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which limits long-term platform credibility compared with suppliers that have maintained verified commercial activity for a much longer period.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core credibility elements expected for a reliable platform supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and relevant service/inspection tags. The main limitation is the relatively short 2-year Gold Supplier history, so it should be assessed as credible but not yet long-established.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 9
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥13.5K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 1

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded actual transaction activity in the past six months, but the order volume and transaction amount remain relatively low. A 5.0 store rating is positive, yet the rating is based on only 1 review, which is insufficient to confirm consistent customer satisfaction across multiple buyers or repeated transactions. The available business data shows some market validation, but not enough to indicate strong commercial traction.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier does not qualify for a high business performance score because recent orders and transaction value are limited. The perfect rating helps the evaluation, but the very small review base weakens reliability. Therefore, the business performance is best categorized as low-to-moderate, with initial commercial proof but insufficient transaction depth.

Final Score
11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Listed
- ODM service available: Listed
- Minor customization: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier shows a reasonable service profile, especially through customization-related tags. Full Customization, ODM service availability, and Minor Customization suggest that the supplier can support different levels of buyer-specific requirements. The response time of ≤2h is acceptable, although it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1h. No additional data is provided regarding quotation speed, sample development lead time, language support, account management, or after-sales handling.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates solid service capability due to its customization and ODM-related tags, combined with a response time within two hours. However, because the response time is not within one hour and there is no further service performance evidence, the score should remain in the normal-to-good range rather than the highest band.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time shipping rate: 75.0%

Elaboration
The delivery performance data shows that three-quarters of shipments are on time. This indicates some delivery capability, but also suggests a meaningful risk of late shipment. For buyers with strict launch calendars, seasonal retail timelines, or marketplace fulfillment requirements, this rate may require close monitoring and clear contractual delivery terms.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipping rate between 70% and 79% falls into the 5–6 point range. At 75.0%, the supplier is in the middle of this band. The score reflects moderate delivery performance with visible room for improvement.

Final Score
6 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 1
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Factory Verification / verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive quality-related profile because Finished Product Inspection is listed and verified supplier status is provided. These indicators suggest that some quality control and verification mechanisms are present. However, customer feedback is very limited, with only 1 review. Although the rating is 5.0, the review volume is too small to confirm consistent quality performance across different orders, products, or buyer requirements.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier deserves credit for a perfect store rating, Finished Product Inspection, and verified supplier status. However, the extremely limited review count prevents a high-confidence quality assessment. The score is therefore placed in the mid range: better than suppliers with no quality signals, but below suppliers with extensive customer feedback and proven inspection records.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

71 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small to medium garment buyers, especially those seeking low-MOQ sourcing, sample orders, small-batch procurement, ODM support, or customized garment development. The supplier has a reasonable factory scale, verified platform status, Trade Assurance, and customization capability, making it suitable for exploratory cooperation.

The main risks are limited recent commercial performance, only 1 customer review, and a moderate 75.0% on-time shipping rate. These factors mean buyers should avoid immediately placing large or time-sensitive orders without additional verification.

Recommended procurement approach: - Start with sample orders or low-volume trial orders. - Confirm production capacity, lead time, and inspection process before bulk purchasing. - Use Trade Assurance and define shipment deadlines clearly. - Request additional quality evidence, such as inspection reports or order references, if available.

Growth potential exists if the supplier improves transaction volume, accumulates more verified reviews, and raises its on-time shipping rate.