Dongguan Yonghe Sports Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Dongguan Yonghe Sports Products Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier offering neoprene-related materials and products, including SBR neoprene fabric, coated neoprene, anti-slip materials, smooth skin neoprene, and customizable neoprene rubber raw material. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, supported by 10 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization. Its recent business activity is moderate to solid, with 70+ orders and CN¥878.9K+ transaction value in the past six months, alongside a high store rating of 4.9. However, key factory scale indicators such as factory area and employee count are not provided, limiting the ability to fully assess production capacity. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking neoprene materials with customization options, low MOQ flexibility, and platform-backed transaction protection, while larger buyers should further verify capacity before placing high-volume orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company: Dongguan Yonghe Sports Products Co., Ltd.
• Location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: Insufficient Data
• Number of employees: Insufficient Data
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope includes multiple neoprene-related materials and customizable neoprene raw materials.

Elaboration

The supplier presents itself as a manufacturer or factory supplier for neoprene materials, with listed products covering several thicknesses and forms, including 2mm, 3mm, 5mm, 10mm neoprene-related materials and coated or smooth skin variants. The presence of multiple product listings suggests a focused product category rather than a broad trading portfolio. However, factory area and employee count are not disclosed, which prevents a complete assessment of manufacturing scale, production workforce, or capacity stability.

The verified supplier status provides some level of factory credibility, but it does not replace detailed operational data such as production lines, monthly output, equipment, factory size, or staffing.

Scoring Rationale

Because the supplier is verified and offers multiple related neoprene material products, it demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and category specialization. However, the absence of factory area and employee data creates a significant limitation when evaluating whether the supplier is a small, medium, or large-scale manufacturer. Based strictly on the available data, the supplier cannot be classified as a large or clearly medium-sized factory. The score therefore reflects a supplier with basic verified production credibility but insufficient evidence of scale.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 10 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry labels:
• Low MOQ for customization
• Finished Product Inspection
• Full Customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform profile, with 10 years of Gold Supplier history. This is a meaningful indicator of platform continuity and operational presence. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection for buyers, while verified supplier status improves baseline credibility. The available platform labels also show that the supplier supports customization and finished product inspection, both of which are relevant for buyers managing product specifications and quality control.

The compliance data is platform-based. No independent third-party certifications such as ISO, BSCI, SGS factory audit reports, or product-specific certifications are provided in the dataset. Therefore, the assessment is limited to platform credibility and listed labels only.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 10-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple relevant platform labels represents a strong platform credibility profile. The supplier meets most of the available platform-based trust indicators. The only reason the score is not perfect is that no additional external factory certification or formal management system certification is provided in the data.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 70+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥878.9K+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has visible recent commercial activity, with more than 70 orders and over CN¥878.9K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active buyer engagement and a reasonable level of market validation on the platform. The 4.9 store rating is strong and suggests positive buyer satisfaction among recorded transactions.

However, the number of reviews is only 10+, which is relatively limited compared with the order count. This means the public feedback base is not large enough to fully confirm long-term consistency across many buyers. The transaction amount is meaningful, but the available data does not clarify order composition, buyer repeat rate, export markets, customer types, or average order value.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable business traction, supported by recent orders, substantial transaction value, and a high store rating. However, the review count is limited, which weakens the depth of commercial validation. The supplier performs above a low-volume supplier but does not have enough review depth to be rated at the highest level.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Full Customization label: Available
• Low MOQ for customization label: Available

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates reasonable service capability through a response time of within three hours. This is acceptable for normal sourcing communication, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. The presence of Full Customization and Low MOQ for customization labels indicates that the supplier is positioned to support customized requirements and smaller customized orders.

No additional data is provided regarding dedicated account management, language capability, sample lead time, engineering support, design assistance, or after-sales service. Therefore, the service evaluation is limited to response time and customization labels.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has clear customization capability and reasonable communication responsiveness. However, because the response time is not within one hour and there is no further evidence of advanced service systems, the score is placed in the upper range of normal service capability rather than the top tier.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 87.5%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is 87.5%, which falls within the 80%–89% performance band. This indicates generally acceptable delivery discipline but also shows that some shipments may not be dispatched on time. For standard or flexible procurement schedules, this level may be manageable. For time-sensitive programs, buyers should confirm production lead time, dispatch schedule, and penalty terms before order placement.

No additional delivery data is provided, such as average lead time, urgent order capability, logistics options, historical delay reasons, or performance by product category.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring rule, an on-time dispatch rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 87.5%, the supplier is near the upper end of this band but still below the 90% threshold for top delivery performance. Therefore, the score reflects solid but not excellent delivery reliability.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 10+
• Finished Product Inspection label: Available
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive indicator of customer satisfaction. The Finished Product Inspection label suggests that some form of final quality checking is available or promoted on the platform. Verified supplier status also supports baseline credibility.

However, the total number of reviews is only 10+, which limits the statistical strength of customer feedback. The data does not provide defect rates, inspection standards, QC staffing, testing equipment, raw material control procedures, or third-party inspection records. Therefore, while the visible quality indicators are positive, the depth of quality assurance information remains incomplete.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a favorable quality score due to its high rating, Finished Product Inspection label, and verified supplier status. Nevertheless, the relatively small review base and lack of detailed quality system documentation prevent a top-tier score. The assessment supports a view of good basic quality credibility, but further quality verification is recommended before large or specification-sensitive orders.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Dongguan Yonghe Sports Products Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking neoprene materials, customized neoprene products, low MOQ customization, and Trade Assurance-backed transactions. The supplier is particularly appropriate for small to medium-volume procurement, sample development, customized material sourcing, and buyers who value platform credibility and responsive communication.

Main strengths include: - 10-year Gold Supplier status
- Trade Assurance support
- Verified supplier status
- Full Customization and Low MOQ customization labels
- Finished Product Inspection label
- Solid recent transaction performance: 70+ orders and CN¥878.9K+ in six months
- High store rating of 4.9

Main risks include: - Factory area: Insufficient Data
- Employee count: Insufficient Data
- Limited review base: 10+ reviews only
- On-time dispatch rate of 87.5%, below the 90% top-performance threshold
- No provided data on production capacity, equipment, monthly output, or external certifications

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good platform maturity and active business performance. If it can provide more transparent factory capacity data, stronger quality documentation, and improved delivery consistency above 90%, it could become a stronger candidate for larger-volume or long-term procurement programs.