Foshan Qi Shi Sports Products Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Foshan Qi Shi Sports Products Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering outdoor cycling, motorcycle, car holder, selfie stick, and related mobile mounting products. Based on the provided platform data, the supplier shows strong platform credibility, including 8 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and several operational tags such as Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service, and warranty availability. Its commercial activity is moderate, with 50+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 5.0 store rating but only 8 reviews. The company is suitable for buyers seeking flexible MOQ access, customized holder/mounting products, and suppliers with verified platform credentials. However, factory area and employee count are not disclosed, limiting visibility into production scale and capacity depth.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Country/Region: CN, Guangdong Province
- Factory area: Insufficient Data
- Number of employees: Insufficient Data
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes cycling selfie sticks, car suction cup phone holders, motorcycle/car holders, spherical components, and motorcycle rain-related products.

Elaboration
The supplier has a verified supplier status, which provides a basic level of credibility regarding its operational existence and supplier profile. Its product listings indicate a focus on outdoor cycling, motorcycle, automotive phone mounting, and related accessory categories. However, key production capacity indicators such as factory area and employee count are missing. Without these data points, it is not possible to fully assess whether the company operates as a large-scale manufacturer, mid-sized factory, or smaller production unit.

Scoring Rationale
The verified supplier status supports a baseline level of company reliability, and the product range suggests operational activity in a defined accessory niche. However, the absence of factory size and workforce information materially limits assessment of production scale, capacity stability, and ability to handle large-volume procurement. Therefore, the score should reflect a supplier with basic verified capability but insufficient evidence of large-scale manufacturing strength.

Final Score: 12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 8 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification/industry tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, Full customization, ODM service available

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility. An 8-year Gold Supplier record indicates relatively long-term platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides transaction protection for buyers. The verified supplier status further strengthens platform-based trust. The listed tags also show coverage across warranty support, inspection, customization, and ODM service, which are relevant to buyers requiring more structured supplier cooperation.

Scoring Rationale
This dimension is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. The combination of 8 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and multiple operational/compliance-related tags represents a complete and credible platform profile. While the provided data does not include additional third-party management system certifications, the platform credibility indicators are well established.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 50+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥338K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 8

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 50 orders and over CN¥338K in transactions during the past six months. This indicates active commercial performance, though not at a high-volume level. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review base of 8 is relatively limited, meaning the rating should be interpreted cautiously. The available data supports evidence of real platform transactions, but the sample size for customer feedback remains small.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates stable but moderate business activity. The order count and transaction amount are meaningful enough to show market validation, yet they do not indicate high-volume trading. The perfect store rating is favorable, but because only 8 reviews are available, the commercial proof is not as strong as suppliers with larger review pools and higher transaction histories. A mid-range score is therefore appropriate.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it is not within the strongest benchmark of one hour or less. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service available tags suggests the supplier can support customized procurement requirements and potentially product adaptation for buyers.

Scoring Rationale
Service capability is supported by customization and ODM availability, which are valuable for buyers needing product variation or branded solutions. However, the response time is not at the fastest level, so the supplier does not qualify for the highest service tier. Overall, the supplier appears to offer solid service support with room for improvement in response speed.

Final Score: 8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The provided delivery metric shows a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. This is a strong indicator of delivery reliability within the available platform data. No additional details are provided regarding shipment volume, logistics regions, or order complexity, so the evaluation is limited strictly to the stated on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. A 100.0% rate supports a full score in this dimension, while noting that the data does not disclose the total shipment sample size behind the rate.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 8
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: Available

Elaboration
The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, which indicates positive customer satisfaction based on the available feedback. It also has Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability listed, suggesting some level of quality assurance and after-sales support. However, the total review count is only 8, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. The verified supplier status adds credibility, but there is no additional information on formal quality certifications or inspection procedures beyond the listed platform tag.

Scoring Rationale
The quality profile is positive but not fully proven at scale. The perfect rating, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status support a favorable assessment. However, the low number of reviews prevents the supplier from receiving a top-tier score, as customer feedback volume is not yet large enough to confirm consistent quality performance across a broad buyer base.

Final Score: 16 / 20

Total Score

80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scaling. Foshan Qi Shi Sports Products Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for small to medium buyers, e-commerce sellers, brand owners requiring customization or ODM support, and procurement teams sourcing motorcycle, cycling, automotive phone holder, and accessory products with flexible MOQ options.

Key advantages include strong platform credibility, 8-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, Full Customization, ODM service, Finished Product Inspection, and a 5.0 store rating. The main risks are insufficient disclosure of factory area and employee count, limited review volume, and moderate transaction scale. These factors reduce visibility into production capacity and large-order reliability.

The supplier shows growth potential due to its strong compliance profile, customization capability, and positive delivery performance. For procurement, it is advisable to begin with sample orders or small-to-medium trial batches, verify product quality through inspection, and request additional factory capacity documents before placing large-volume or long-term orders.