Yiwu Qi'An Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yiwu Qi'an Stationery Co., Ltd. is a China-based stationery supplier located in Zhejiang, offering notebook-related products such as cartoon student notebooks, B5 sewn notebooks, A5 loose-leaf notebooks, hardcover glue-bound notebooks, and mini paper books. Based on the provided data, the company operates with a reported factory area of over 2,400㎡ and more than 20 staff, indicating a small-scale but established production base. The supplier is listed as a Gold Supplier for 1 year and supports Trade Assurance, with a reported on-time delivery rate of 98.0%, which is a strong delivery indicator. Commercial performance shows 90+ orders and CN¥47.3K+ transaction value over the past six months, suggesting active but relatively modest marketplace traction. The store rating is 4.4 with 9 reviews, which is acceptable but not yet strongly validated by a large customer feedback base. This supplier appears suitable for small to medium buyers, trial orders, low-MOQ procurement, and stationery retailers seeking flexible notebook sourcing.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company: Yiwu Qi'an Stationery Co., Ltd.
• Location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 2,400+㎡
• Employees: 20+ staff
• Verified/Audited supplier: True

Elaboration

The company has a reported factory area of more than 2,400㎡ and a workforce of over 20 employees. This indicates that the supplier has a physical production or operating base rather than functioning only as a trading storefront. The factory size is moderate for stationery products, especially notebooks and paper-based items, but the employee count suggests a relatively small operational team.

The presence of a verified or audited supplier status adds credibility to the company’s basic operational legitimacy. However, the provided data does not include detailed information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, quality control staff, export experience, or factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability, the scale cannot be classified as large.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows evidence of having a real operating facility and verified supplier status, which supports a reasonable baseline of company strength. However, with only 20+ staff and no disclosed production capacity, it is more appropriate to classify the company as a small to lower-mid-sized supplier rather than a large-scale manufacturer. The factory area is acceptable, but the limited workforce and lack of deeper production data constrain the score.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Response time ≤3h
• On-time delivery 98.0%
• Verified/Audited supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has Gold Supplier status and supports Trade Assurance, which are important platform-level credibility indicators. Trade Assurance provides buyers with a more structured transaction protection mechanism on the platform. The company is also marked as a verified/audited supplier, which improves basic trustworthiness.

However, the Gold Supplier duration is only 1 year. This indicates that the supplier has limited platform history compared with long-established suppliers. The available tags mainly relate to response time and delivery performance rather than broader compliance certifications. No independent product certifications, management system certifications, or detailed factory audit documentation are provided in the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified/audited supplier status. These are positive indicators. However, the short Gold Supplier history and limited certification details prevent it from being rated as a highly mature or fully established platform supplier. The credibility level is solid but still developing.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 90+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥47.3K+
• Store rating: 4.4
• Number of reviews: 9

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 90 orders in the past six months, showing active marketplace transactions. This indicates that the company is not inactive and has attracted repeat or multiple buyers during the recent period.

However, the transaction amount of CN¥47.3K+ over six months is relatively modest, suggesting that most orders may be small-value transactions. The store rating of 4.4 is acceptable, though not exceptional. The review count of 9 is quite limited, which reduces the statistical reliability of the customer feedback data.

The product listings also show very low MOQs, ranging from 1 to 4 pieces, which may support small-batch and trial orders but may also explain the relatively low transaction value.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has demonstrated real commercial activity with 90+ recent orders, which is a positive signal. However, the relatively low transaction value and small number of reviews indicate that market validation is still limited. The rating is fair but not strong enough to offset the limited feedback base. Overall, business performance is active but not yet highly proven.

Final Score

13 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤3h
• Platform tag: Response time ≤3h
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier reports a response time of within 3 hours, which is a positive service indicator and suggests that inquiries are likely handled within a reasonable timeframe. This is suitable for buyers who require timely communication during product selection, quotation, sampling, or order confirmation.

However, the provided data does not state whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, logo customization, packaging customization, or product design modification. Since customization capability is an important part of service evaluation, this missing information limits the supplier’s score in this dimension.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is acceptable and demonstrates basic communication efficiency. However, it does not meet the highest benchmark of response within 1 hour, and there is insufficient data on customization capability. Therefore, the supplier can be considered to have normal service responsiveness, but not enough evidence to confirm strong service or customization capability.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 98.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 98.0%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% falls into the highest scoring range. This suggests that, based on available platform data, the supplier has maintained reliable shipment timing for completed orders.

For procurement purposes, strong delivery performance is particularly important for stationery buyers managing seasonal demand, school-supply cycles, promotional campaigns, or retail replenishment schedules.

Scoring Rationale

With a 98.0% on-time delivery rate, the supplier clearly meets the highest delivery performance threshold. This is one of the strongest aspects of the supplier profile. No negative delivery data is provided.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.4
• Number of reviews: 9
• Verified/Audited supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: True, based on verified/audited supplier status in the provided data

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.4, which suggests generally acceptable customer satisfaction. However, the number of reviews is only 9, meaning the feedback sample is small. A limited review base makes it difficult to draw strong conclusions about consistent product quality across multiple buyers and order batches.

The verified/audited supplier status provides some assurance regarding company legitimacy and basic factory credibility. However, the data does not mention Finished Product Inspection, quality control procedures, inspection reports, defect rates, product compliance testing, or third-party certifications. Therefore, the quality assurance system cannot be considered fully documented.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a fair rating and some verification support, but the low review count and lack of Finished Product Inspection information limit confidence in quality consistency. The quality profile is acceptable for cautious trial procurement, but it is not yet strongly validated for large-scale or high-risk sourcing projects.

Final Score

13 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Yiwu Qi'an Stationery Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ notebook products, small-batch sourcing, trial orders, retail testing, online shop replenishment, or budget stationery procurement. The supplier’s key strengths are its verified/audited status, Trade Assurance support, active recent order record, low MOQs, and excellent reported on-time delivery rate of 98.0%.

However, buyers should be cautious with larger-volume procurement because the company has limited disclosed scale, only 20+ staff, a short 1-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥47.3K+ transaction value in the past six months, and only 9 reviews. Quality assurance information is also incomplete, especially regarding Finished Product Inspection and detailed QC processes.

Suggested procurement approach:
Start with sample or small trial orders, verify product quality and packaging consistency, confirm customization capability directly if required, and use Trade Assurance for transaction protection. If trial performance is stable, the supplier may be considered for gradual order scaling.