Yiwu Shuangyi Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yiwu Shuangyi Stationery Co., Ltd. is a China-based stationery supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 8,900+㎡ and 190+ staff. The supplier shows a moderate manufacturing foundation and is marked as a verified supplier, which supports basic confidence in production capability. Its listed products are mainly office and school stationery items with low MOQs of 20 pieces, making it potentially suitable for small-batch buyers, trial orders, or distributors seeking flexible procurement quantities. On , the company is a 2-year Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance, with a listed response time of ≤2 hours and 100% on-time delivery. However, commercial performance data is limited, with only 20+ orders and CN¥13.5K+ transaction value in the past six months. Store rating is not provided, and review count is 0, which creates uncertainty around customer satisfaction and quality consistency. Overall, this supplier is suitable for cautious cooperation through sample orders or small initial purchases, rather than immediate large-scale procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory location: Zhejiang, China
• Factory area: 8,900+㎡
• Employees: 190+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope shown: stationery and office/school supply items

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area of more than 8,900 square meters and a workforce of over 190 employees. These figures indicate a medium-sized manufacturing setup rather than a small trading-only operation. The presence of a verified supplier status further strengthens the credibility of its physical operating base. The listed products are within stationery categories, including clips, loose-leaf rings, plastic paper-related products, and office/school supply items, suggesting a focused product range within light stationery manufacturing or supply.

However, the provided data does not include detailed production line numbers, monthly production capacity, machinery lists, export market coverage, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indicator. Therefore, while the supplier demonstrates a reasonable production foundation, the scale cannot be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain based only on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

With 8,900+㎡ of factory area and 190+ staff, the company appears to have stronger capacity than a small workshop and can likely support regular small-to-medium order requirements. The verified supplier status adds confidence, but the lack of detailed production capacity and factory certification information prevents a higher score. Based on the scoring standard, this fits the “medium stable factory” range.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry labels: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has Gold Supplier status for 2 years and supports Trade Assurance, which provides basic platform-level transaction protection. The verified supplier status also supports platform credibility. The available labels indicate operational performance in response speed and delivery timeliness, but there is no additional information on formal product certifications, factory management certifications, compliance standards, or industry-specific certifications.

The Gold Supplier duration of 2 years shows platform participation but is still relatively short compared with suppliers that have long-term platform histories. Compliance credibility is therefore acceptable but not comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, and certification labels are limited to response and delivery indicators rather than broader factory or product compliance certifications. This places the supplier in the “core certifications present but shorter history” category.

Final Score

15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 20+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥13.5K+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Review count: 0

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 20 orders and over CN¥13.5K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the store has active transactions, but the scale is relatively limited. The order volume is not high, and the transaction amount is modest, especially for evaluating broader commercial reliability.

A key limitation is the absence of store rating data and the fact that review count is 0. This means there is no visible customer feedback base to support conclusions about buyer satisfaction, repeat purchasing, or dispute performance. As a result, the supplier’s business validation remains weak despite some recent transaction activity.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has measurable transaction history, which prevents it from being classified as completely unverified commercially. However, 20+ orders and CN¥13.5K+ transaction value over six months represent a relatively low commercial scale. The lack of store rating and zero reviews significantly reduce confidence in market acceptance and customer satisfaction. Therefore, the score falls into the lower end of the “low transaction scale or fewer orders” range.

Final Score

10 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Platform label: “Response time ≤2h”
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported response time of ≤2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. This is beneficial for buyers requiring quotation clarification, order confirmation, or basic after-sales communication. However, the data does not state whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, packaging customization, logo customization, or design development services.

Because customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot be evaluated as having strong customized service capacity. Its service capability can only be assessed based on response speed.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤2 hours is relatively efficient, though it does not meet the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since there is no data confirming Full Customization capability, the supplier should not receive a top-tier service score. The available evidence supports a normal-to-good service level but not a strong customization-oriented service profile.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
• Platform label: “On-time delivery 100.0%”

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Based on the provided scoring standard, any on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. This is one of the supplier’s strongest measurable indicators.

However, the data does not provide the number of shipments behind this delivery rate. Therefore, while the stated performance is excellent, the depth of the delivery record cannot be further validated from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The on-time delivery rate is clearly stated as 100.0%, which directly meets the highest delivery performance standard. Although the underlying shipment volume is not provided, the available data supports a full score within this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Review count: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Verified supplier: True
• On-time delivery: 100.0%

Elaboration

Quality and customer feedback data is limited. The supplier has no provided store rating and has 0 reviews, which means there is no visible customer feedback to assess product satisfaction, consistency, complaint handling, or repeat buyer confidence. In addition, there is no data confirming Finished Product Inspection or other quality assurance processes.

The verified supplier status provides some basic reassurance regarding supplier legitimacy, but it does not replace direct evidence of product quality management or customer satisfaction. Therefore, the supplier’s quality profile remains under-validated.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives some credit for verified supplier status and strong delivery performance, but the lack of rating, absence of reviews, and missing Finished Product Inspection information prevent a higher quality score. Since customer feedback is effectively unavailable, the supplier falls into the lower range for quality validation.

Final Score

10 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended, starting with small trial orders.

Yiwu Shuangyi Stationery Co., Ltd. shows a reasonable supplier foundation, supported by an 8,900+㎡ factory area, 190+ staff, verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance, and 100.0% on-time delivery. These factors make it suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ stationery items, trial procurement, small-batch purchasing, or flexible sourcing of office and school supply products.

However, the main risks are limited business validation and insufficient customer feedback. The past six-month transaction value is only CN¥13.5K+, order volume is 20+, store rating is unavailable, and review count is 0. In addition, there is no provided data confirming Finished Product Inspection or customization capability.

For procurement teams, the recommended approach is to begin with samples or small-volume orders, verify product quality directly, confirm packaging and inspection requirements in writing, and use Trade Assurance for payment protection. If trial order quality and communication performance are satisfactory, the supplier may have potential for gradual order scaling.