Shenzhen Kaihongyu Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Kaihongyu Stationery Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based stationery supplier with a reported factory area of 2,100+㎡ and 20+ staff. The company has been an Gold Supplier for 19 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is listed as a verified supplier, which gives it a strong platform credibility profile. Its product data indicates a focus on low-unit-price stationery and marker-related items with MOQs mainly at 500–1,000 pieces. Business performance is supported by 100+ orders and CN¥3.1M+ transaction value over the past six months, although the store rating of 4.4 and 10+ reviews suggest that customer feedback volume is still limited. Service capability is supported by Full Customization, but response time is ≤5 hours rather than within one hour. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking customized, cost-sensitive stationery products with platform-backed transaction protection, while quality validation should still be managed through sampling and inspection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company name: Shenzhen Kaihongyu Stationery Co., Ltd.
• Location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 2,100+㎡
• Staff size: 20+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a stated production site of over 2,100 square meters and more than 20 employees. This indicates the company has an operating factory base rather than functioning only as a trading storefront. The verified supplier status also provides a basic level of factory credibility. However, the employee count is relatively limited, and the provided data does not show larger-scale production lines, annual capacity, machinery quantity, warehouse size, or detailed factory audit results.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capability with a defined factory area and staff base, supported by verified supplier status. However, based strictly on the available data, it does not qualify as a large-scale supplier because the workforce size is modest and no detailed production capacity data is provided. It fits best into the category of a small to lower-mid-sized factory with established but not large-scale production capability.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 19 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Warranty available
• Socially responsible
• Finished product inspection
• Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a very long Gold Supplier history of 19 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support reduces transaction risk for buyers using ’s protected payment and order framework. The supplier also carries multiple platform tags, including warranty availability, social responsibility, finished product inspection, and full customization. These labels indicate relatively complete platform-level compliance and service visibility.

Scoring Rationale

This is one of the supplier’s strongest dimensions. A 19-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple compliance/service tags form a strong credibility foundation. While the data does not include third-party international certifications or detailed audit documentation, the platform credibility indicators are comprehensive and long-standing.

Final Score

20 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥3.1M+
• Store rating: 4.4
• Number of reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved more than 100 orders and over CN¥3.1M in transaction value in the past six months. This shows meaningful recent commercial activity and suggests the company is actively receiving and fulfilling orders. However, the number of reviews is only 10+, which limits the depth of buyer feedback available for evaluation. The store rating of 4.4 is acceptable but not at the highest performance level.

Scoring Rationale

The transaction amount is strong relative to the available data, and the order volume indicates active market participation. However, the relatively low review count weakens the level of commercial validation, and the 4.4 rating suggests performance is good but not exceptional. Therefore, the supplier should be assessed as having stable medium-to-good business performance rather than top-tier market proof.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤5h
• Full customization: True

Elaboration

The supplier supports Full Customization, which is valuable for buyers requiring customized logos, designs, colors, or product adaptations within the product categories shown. The response time is listed as within five hours, which is acceptable for general B2B communication but does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid service capability due to its customization support. However, the response time is not fast enough to be considered top-tier under the given scoring standard. The available data also does not include information on dedicated account management, sample lead time, after-sales handling speed, or multilingual support, so the score should remain in the upper-middle range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 98.8%

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated on-time delivery rate is 98.8%, which is above the 90% benchmark for the highest delivery performance category. This suggests strong execution reliability for confirmed orders based on the available platform data.

Scoring Rationale

A 98.8% on-time shipment rate indicates very strong delivery discipline and is one of the clearest strengths in the dataset. Since the score is based directly on the provided delivery metric, the supplier qualifies for the top scoring range in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.4
• Number of reviews: 10+
• Finished Product Inspection: True
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a store rating of 4.4 and more than 10 reviews. The rating is generally positive, but the review volume is limited, meaning the customer feedback base is not yet broad enough to provide highly robust validation. The presence of Finished Product Inspection is a positive quality-control indicator, and verified supplier status adds further assurance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has basic quality assurance support through Finished Product Inspection and verification status. However, the relatively small number of reviews limits the strength of customer feedback evidence. The 4.4 rating is acceptable but not high enough to justify a top-tier quality score. Therefore, the supplier fits the category of good basic quality control with moderate customer feedback validation.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Shenzhen Kaihongyu Stationery Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking customized, low-to-mid MOQ stationery and marker-related products with Trade Assurance protection. The supplier is especially appropriate for small and medium-sized importers, promotional product buyers, stationery distributors, and buyers requiring custom logo or customized product options.

Key strengths include a 19-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, finished product inspection, strong on-time delivery performance of 98.8%, and recent transaction value of CN¥3.1M+ over six months.

Main risks are the modest company scale, limited staff size of 20+ employees, relatively low review volume of 10+, and a store rating of 4.4, which is acceptable but not exceptional. Before large-volume purchasing, buyers should request samples, confirm specifications in writing, use Trade Assurance, and consider pre-shipment inspection.

Growth potential is positive due to strong platform credibility, active recent transactions, and customization capability, but supplier qualification should be strengthened through order-by-order quality verification.