zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Dratec Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Dratec Stationery Co., Ltd. is a China-based stationery supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 2,200+㎡ and 20+ staff. The company offers pencil-related stationery products, including carpenter pencils, HB wooden pencils, eraser pencils, customized logo pencils, and school supply pencil products, with relatively low MOQs across several listings. From a platform credibility perspective, the supplier shows strong -side validation: 15 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Commercial activity is moderate, with 70+ orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a high store rating of 4.9 but only 10+ reviews. Delivery performance is acceptable but not outstanding, with an on-time delivery rate of 80.9%. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking cost-effective stationery sourcing, small-to-medium volume pencil procurement, and basic customization, while larger buyers should further verify production scalability and quality control processes before placing high-volume orders.

Dratec Stationery Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Country/Region: China
  • Factory location: Shandong
  • Factory area: 2,200+㎡
  • Employees: 20+ staff
  • Verified supplier/factory audit status: True

Elaboration

Dratec Stationery Co., Ltd. has a physical manufacturing base with a reported factory size of over 2,200㎡ and more than 20 employees. This indicates the supplier has a defined production facility and basic operational structure. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and operational legitimacy of the company.

However, based strictly on the provided data, the scale is relatively modest. A factory area of 2,200+㎡ and 20+ staff suggests a small-to-lower-medium production operation rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer. There is no provided information about production lines, annual capacity, machinery, warehouse size, or number of production shifts.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and has verified supplier status, which supports confidence in its operational presence. However, the available factory size and employee count do not indicate a large-scale supply chain. Since no detailed production capacity data is provided, the company should be assessed as a small but operationally established supplier rather than a high-capacity manufacturer.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 15 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Platform/industry tags:
  • ODM service available
  • Minor customization
  • Response time ≤3h
  • On-time delivery 80.9%

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 15-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence. Trade Assurance support also provides buyers with additional transactional protection on . The verified supplier status further strengthens confidence in the company’s platform authenticity.

The certification and capability tags show that the supplier supports ODM service and minor customization. However, the provided data does not include independent product certifications, management system certifications, or specific compliance certificates such as ISO, FSC, BSCI, CE, or similar standards. Therefore, the compliance assessment is strong at the platform level but limited at the product or factory certification level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs strongly in platform credibility due to its 15-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are meaningful indicators for procurement risk reduction. However, because no additional factory management certifications or product compliance documents are provided, the score should not reach a perfect level.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 70+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥676.1K+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier shows active business performance on the platform. Over the past six months, it recorded more than 70 orders and over CN¥676.1K in transaction value. This indicates that the company has recent commercial traction and has completed measurable transactions with buyers.

The store rating of 4.9 is strong and suggests positive buyer satisfaction among reviewed transactions. However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the statistical strength of the rating. The transaction level is moderate rather than high-volume, and the order count does not yet indicate very large-scale market validation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has demonstrated real recent sales activity, acceptable order volume, and a strong rating. The CN¥676.1K+ six-month transaction value indicates meaningful but not large-scale business performance. The relatively low review count reduces the confidence level of customer feedback validation. Therefore, the supplier fits the “stable medium-level transaction” category rather than the highest commercial performance tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Platform tag: ODM service available
  • Platform tag: Minor customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within three hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency. This is suitable for normal sourcing inquiries, price negotiations, sample discussions, and order follow-up.

The supplier also has tags showing ODM service availability and minor customization. This suggests it can support some level of customized product requirements, particularly relevant for stationery items such as customized logo pencils. However, the provided data does not confirm Full Customization capability. Therefore, its service capability should be considered practical but not highly advanced based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier offers a reasonable response time and has evidence of ODM and minor customization capability. However, the response time is not within one hour, and Full Customization is not confirmed. As a result, the supplier should be scored in the normal-to-good service capability range rather than the top tier.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 80.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 80.9%. This falls within the 80%–89% range, indicating acceptable but not excellent delivery performance. Buyers can expect a generally functional delivery process, but the percentage also suggests that delivery delays may occur in a meaningful portion of transactions.

There is no additional data on average lead time, production cycle, logistics capability, urgent order handling, or historical delay reasons. Therefore, the delivery assessment must rely solely on the provided on-time delivery rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Since the supplier is close to the lower end of this band at 80.9%, a conservative score is appropriate.

Final Score

7 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Reviews: 10+
  • Verified supplier/factory verification: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is positive for perceived customer satisfaction. The verified supplier status also provides some level of confidence in the company’s authenticity and operational review.

However, the number of reviews is limited at 10+, which means the rating is based on a relatively small visible feedback sample. In addition, no specific Finished Product Inspection information is provided. There is also no data on defect rates, quality control procedures, product testing reports, inspection standards, or third-party quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has positive quality-related indicators through its high rating and verified supplier status. However, the limited number of reviews and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection data prevent a higher score. The quality profile is acceptable for standard stationery procurement but should be further verified before large or quality-sensitive orders.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 7 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 14 / 20
Total Score 75 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Dratec Stationery Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking cost-effective stationery products, especially pencil-related items with low-to-medium order volumes and basic customization needs. The supplier’s strongest advantages are its 15-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and active recent transaction record.

Suitable customer types: - Small and medium-sized stationery importers
- Promotional product buyers requiring customized logo pencils
- School supply distributors seeking low MOQ options
- Buyers prioritizing platform-backed sourcing security through Trade Assurance

Main risk points: - Factory scale appears limited based on 2,200+㎡ and 20+ staff
- On-time delivery rate is only 80.9%, requiring delivery schedule monitoring
- Review count is limited at 10+, reducing feedback reliability
- Finished Product Inspection data is not provided
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed

Growth potential: The supplier has good platform credibility and stable transaction activity. If it can improve delivery reliability, provide clearer quality inspection documentation, and demonstrate stronger production capacity, it may become more suitable for larger-volume or more demanding procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shuangyi Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Shuangyi Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yixing Huhua Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yixing Huhua Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ninghai Jiufeng Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ninghai Jiufeng Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Runda Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Runda Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kamei Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kamei Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tianyi Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tianyi Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Longgang Haha Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Longgang Haha Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Langyucai Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Langyucai Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Jielisi Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Jielisi Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Moka Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Moka Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaihongyu Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaihongyu Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pingyang Feifan Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pingyang Feifan Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jiumu Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jiumu Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Tinghao Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Tinghao Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Prolead Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Prolead Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhaoqing Sta Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhaoqing Sta Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qi'An Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Qi'An Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sidaixue Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sidaixue Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kassel Jinan Automation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kassel Jinan Automation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Suzhou Beiang Smart Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Beiang Smart Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sanfeng Cell Phone Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sanfeng Cell Phone Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Scientec Electrical Mfg. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Scientec Electrical Mfg. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Good Young Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Good Young Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Ruijie Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Ruijie Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Enersource Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Enersource Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Rambo Auto Parts Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Rambo Auto Parts Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Vertexis Smart Home Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Vertexis Smart Home Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Singer Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Singer Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Magic Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Magic Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chuangruixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chuangruixiang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hualiruitong Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hualiruitong Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Fuhua Wanshixing Hardware And Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Fuhua Wanshixing Hardware And Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hulang Lighting Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Hulang Lighting Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Taishi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Taishi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Newtop Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Newtop Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Big Dipper Laser Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Big Dipper Laser Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Xinlikang Precision Casting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Xinlikang Precision Casting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Denorgin Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Denorgin Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Welllink (Guangdong) New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Welllink (Guangdong) New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026