zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Enersource Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary
Shenzhen Enersource Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 4,300+㎡ and 30+ staff. Based on the provided product listings, the company appears to supply battery-related products across multiple voltage and capacity ranges, with relatively low MOQs from 1–2 units or packs depending on the item. The supplier has a stronger platform credibility profile, including 7 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and 100% on-time delivery. Commercial performance shows moderate activity, with 20+ orders and CN¥1.9M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.5 store rating and 10+ reviews. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking verified battery suppliers with moderate transaction validation, low MOQ flexibility, and reliable delivery performance, while larger enterprise buyers should further verify production capacity, technical certifications, and customization capability before scaling procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength
Basis:
- Factory area: 4,300+㎡
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a documented physical production base and a verified supplier status, which provides a basic level of confidence in operational existence and manufacturing capability. The 4,300+㎡ factory size indicates a small-to-medium production facility rather than a large-scale industrial operation. The reported 30+ staff suggests that the company may be capable of handling regular production and small-to-medium orders, but the workforce scale does not indicate a large mass-production organization.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates real production infrastructure and verification, which supports a stable baseline assessment. However, the employee count is relatively limited, and no additional factory audit certificates, production lines, annual capacity, or advanced manufacturing certifications are provided. Therefore, the supplier fits best into the category of a smaller but operationally capable manufacturer rather than a large-scale supply chain partner.

Final Score: 14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry labels: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, Response time ≤2h, On-time delivery 100.0%
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. Seven years as a Gold Supplier indicates a relatively long operating history on the platform. Trade Assurance support reduces transaction risk for buyers, while verified supplier status adds credibility to the company profile. The presence of warranty availability and finished product inspection also strengthens the supplier’s compliance and buyer protection positioning.

Scoring Rationale:
The combination of long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and platform-backed service/quality labels provides a solid credibility foundation. The only limitation is that no independent product certifications, international compliance documents, or specific factory audit standards are provided. Still, based strictly on the available platform data, this is one of the supplier’s strongest dimensions.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance
Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.9M+
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 10+

Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded measurable transaction activity over the past six months. CN¥1.9M+ in transaction value indicates meaningful commercial traction, while 20+ orders suggest a moderate order frequency. The 4.5 rating is positive, though the review count of 10+ is still relatively limited and does not represent a large customer feedback base.

Scoring Rationale:
The transaction amount is relatively strong compared with the order count, suggesting that some orders may have meaningful value. However, the overall order volume and review base remain moderate rather than high. The business performance is commercially validated but not yet supported by a large number of public reviews or very high order frequency.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability
Basis:
- Response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier provides a response time within two hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing. This is positive for inquiry handling, quotation follow-up, and general procurement communication. However, no data is provided confirming Full Customization capability, engineering support, OEM/ODM depth, sample development process, or dedicated account service.

Scoring Rationale:
The response time is good, but it does not meet the highest benchmark of response within one hour. Because customization capability is not confirmed in the provided data, the supplier cannot be rated as having strong service capability. The score reflects efficient basic communication but limited evidence of advanced service or customization support.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance
Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery indicator. This suggests that, based on available platform data, the supplier has been able to meet agreed shipping timelines. For procurement teams, this is particularly important when managing replenishment cycles, project deadlines, or inventory planning.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension. No negative delivery data is provided.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis:
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 10+
- Finished product inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration:
The supplier has a favorable 4.5 store rating and provides finished product inspection, which supports a basic quality assurance framework. Warranty availability further improves buyer confidence. However, the number of reviews is only 10+, which limits the statistical strength of customer feedback. No detailed defect rates, inspection reports, product certifications, or third-party test results are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates positive quality indicators through finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. The 4.5 rating is good, but the limited review count prevents a higher score. The quality profile is credible at a basic-to-moderate level, but not yet strong enough to be considered fully proven for high-volume or highly regulated procurement without further verification.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score: 79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended with controlled order volume and verification steps. Shenzhen Enersource Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking battery-related products, low MOQ purchasing, moderate-volume sourcing, and suppliers with platform-backed credibility. The main strengths are 7-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, finished product inspection, and 100% on-time delivery. Key risks include limited employee scale, only 10+ reviews, insufficient data on Full Customization, and no provided independent product certifications or detailed production capacity data. The supplier shows good growth potential for small-to-medium procurement programs, but larger buyers should request technical documents, sample testing, factory audit details, and certification evidence before placing high-value or recurring bulk orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Retop Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Retop Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shanxi Rongshengchang Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Rongshengchang Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Taige Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Taige Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Unique Catering Equipment Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Unique Catering Equipment Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Licon Electronic Tec. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Licon Electronic Tec. Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Meizhoubao Industrial And Commercial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Meizhoubao Industrial And Commercial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Medy Lashes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Medy Lashes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengxing Caps & Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengxing Caps & Garments Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Jemell Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Jemell Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Honghaili Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Honghaili Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sunway Steel Building Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sunway Steel Building Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jiuchi New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jiuchi New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Foho Sport And Leisure Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Foho Sport And Leisure Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hongkong Penglian Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hongkong Penglian Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Zhixi (Shanghai) Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhixi (Shanghai) Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dinggin Hardware (Dalian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dinggin Hardware (Dalian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Chuanmian Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Chuanmian Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Liansu Yangming Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Liansu Yangming Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Goldensign Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Goldensign Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dukas Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Dukas Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Lanhua Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Lanhua Kitchenware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026