zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd.

Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based tablet supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 6,300+㎡ and 170+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a mid-sized, operationally stable manufacturer or factory-based supplier with verified supplier status. Its product portfolio focuses on Android tablets, including 7-inch, 10-inch, and 11-inch models, with low MOQ levels of 1–2 pieces, making it suitable for sample orders, small-batch buyers, online sellers, and customized procurement projects.

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility, with 10 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and service labels including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service, and warranty availability. Business performance is also solid, with 500+ orders and CN¥5.2M+ transaction value over the past six months. Key strengths include high on-time shipment rate, established platform history, and customization capability. Main risks are moderate store rating and limited disclosed information on formal factory certifications beyond platform verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 6,300+㎡
  • Employees: 170+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
  • Main product category shown: Android tablets

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed production footprint of more than 6,300 square meters and over 170 employees. This indicates a meaningful manufacturing or production-support capacity rather than a very small trading operation. The company’s scale is suitable for handling regular commercial orders, sample-based purchasing, and moderate-volume customized tablet projects.

The verified supplier status also adds credibility to the company’s operational presence. However, the provided data does not include details such as annual production capacity, production lines, equipment list, R&D team size, ISO certifications, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the supplier appears to have stable mid-sized production capability, the available data is not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale manufacturing group.

Scoring Rationale

A factory area above 6,000㎡ and a workforce above 170 staff support a solid mid-sized supplier profile. The supplier is stronger than a small workshop or basic trading company, especially with verified supplier status. However, because there is no disclosed production capacity, no detailed factory audit document, and no formal management system certification information provided, it should not be scored in the highest 18–20 range reserved for large-scale, highly documented supply chains.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 10 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verification status: True
  • Certification / service labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • Full customization
  • ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform profile, with 10 years of Gold Supplier history. This is a significant indicator of long-term platform presence and continuity. Trade Assurance support provides additional transaction protection for buyers, especially for cross-border procurement involving payment security and delivery-related terms.

The listed service and compliance-related labels also strengthen credibility. Finished Product Inspection indicates a quality-control-related process is available, while warranty availability provides after-sales support visibility. Full Customization and ODM service suggest the supplier is positioned not only for standard tablet sales but also for customized buyer requirements.

However, the provided data does not specify internationally recognized certifications such as ISO, CE, FCC, RoHS, or product compliance documents. Therefore, compliance credibility is strong at the platform level, but external certification completeness cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier qualifies for a high score because it combines long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple relevant service labels. A 10-year Gold Supplier record is especially valuable for platform credibility. The only reason the score is not a perfect 20 is that the available data does not provide detailed independent factory audit reports or formal product/system certification documents.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 500+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥5.2M+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 200+

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated active transaction performance over the most recent six-month period. More than 500 orders and CN¥5.2M+ in transaction value show that the company has consistent commercial activity and is not an inactive or untested storefront. The order count suggests regular buyer engagement, while the transaction value indicates meaningful revenue generation through the platform.

The store rating of 4.6 is generally positive, though not at the very highest level. The review count of 200+ provides a reasonable base for assessing customer satisfaction, making the rating more meaningful than a score based on only a few reviews.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s business performance is strong due to high recent order volume and substantial transaction value. The 500+ order count over six months suggests good market acceptance, and CN¥5.2M+ indicates commercial validation. The 4.6 rating is favorable, but it leaves some room for improvement compared with suppliers maintaining very high ratings closer to 4.8–5.0. Therefore, the supplier fits the high-performance category but not the absolute top tier.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Available
  • ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time of within two hours, which is acceptable for international B2B communication and indicates a reasonably responsive sales or service team. The availability of Full Customization and ODM service is particularly relevant for buyers requiring private-label tablets, specification adjustments, packaging customization, or project-based development support.

The low MOQs shown in the product data, such as 1–2 pieces, also support flexible purchasing at the sample or trial-order stage. However, the response time does not meet the strongest benchmark of one hour or less. Additionally, the data does not include information on multilingual service, dedicated project managers, engineering support process, or after-sales response procedures.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has clear customization capability and an acceptable response speed. This supports a strong service profile for buyers needing ODM or customized tablet procurement. However, because the response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, and because deeper service process details are not provided, the supplier is best assessed in the upper-middle service range rather than the maximum range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time shipment rate: 98.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time shipment rate of 98.9% is very strong. This indicates reliable delivery execution based on the available platform data. For procurement buyers, especially those managing inventory cycles, e-commerce replenishment, or project delivery deadlines, a high on-time shipment rate is an important operational advantage.

The data does not provide average lead time, peak-season delivery stability, logistics options, or historical delay reasons. However, the stated on-time shipment percentage alone is sufficient to support a high delivery-performance score under the required scoring criteria.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 98.9%, the supplier is close to full delivery reliability based on the provided information. Therefore, the supplier deserves the maximum score in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 200+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
  • Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.6 store rating supported by more than 200 reviews, which provides a meaningful customer feedback base. This suggests generally positive buyer satisfaction, though the score is not at the highest possible level. The presence of Finished Product Inspection is an important quality-control indicator, particularly for electronic products such as tablets, where functionality testing and final inspection are essential.

Warranty availability further supports buyer confidence, as it indicates some level of post-sale quality responsibility. The verified supplier status also contributes to quality assurance credibility. However, the provided data does not include defect rates, inspection standards, test procedures, product compliance certificates, warranty duration, or return/replacement policy details. These missing elements prevent a maximum quality score.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a solid quality profile based on customer feedback volume, a good rating, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and verification status. These factors support a high score. However, the 4.6 rating indicates there may be some customer experience variability, and the absence of detailed quality certifications or inspection documentation limits certainty. Therefore, the supplier is scored as strong but not perfect in quality assurance.

Final Score

18 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 17 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 18 / 20
Total Score 90 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation

Recommended for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking Android tablet sourcing, sample orders, small-to-medium batch procurement, ODM projects, or customized product requirements.

Suitable Customer Types

  • E-commerce sellers requiring low MOQ tablet sourcing
  • Small and medium importers testing market demand
  • Buyers needing Android tablet customization or ODM support
  • Distributors seeking suppliers with proven transaction history
  • Procurement teams requiring Trade Assurance and platform-backed transaction protection

Main Strengths

  • 10-year Gold Supplier history
  • Trade Assurance supported
  • Verified supplier status
  • 500+ orders and CN¥5.2M+ transaction value in the past six months
  • Strong on-time shipment rate of 98.9%
  • Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, Full Customization, and ODM service available
  • Mid-sized factory scale with 6,300+㎡ area and 170+ staff

Main Risk Points

  • Store rating is 4.6, which is positive but not top-tier
  • Formal third-party product certifications are not provided in the data: Insufficient Data
  • Detailed factory audit report, production capacity, production line count, and equipment information are not provided: Insufficient Data
  • Warranty duration and after-sales policy details are not provided: Insufficient Data
  • No disclosed defect rate or detailed quality-control procedure: Insufficient Data

Growth Potential

The supplier shows strong growth potential within the Android tablet sourcing segment due to its established credibility, recent transaction activity, customization capability, and high delivery reliability. If the supplier can provide more detailed compliance documents, quality-control records, and formal certification evidence, it could become more suitable for larger-scale professional buyers and stricter import markets.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Itzr Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Itzr Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingjiang Asian-Pacific Special Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jingjiang Asian-Pacific Special Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Kruger Rango Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kruger Rango Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Botou Ever Lucky Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Botou Ever Lucky Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Win Win Tech. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Win Win Tech. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gongyi Filter Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gongyi Filter Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Weilong Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Weilong Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Tianniu Transmission Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Tianniu Transmission Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hongmai Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hongmai Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Hengyin Automation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Hengyin Automation Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Lvkang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Lvkang Building Materials Group Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Noble Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Noble Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Haiyun Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Haiyun Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Sixth Mechanical Electrical Equipment Co,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Sixth Mechanical Electrical Equipment Co,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yuniu Fiberglass Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yuniu Fiberglass Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jiuchi New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Jiuchi New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Lianshun Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Lianshun Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tuoye Outdoor Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Tuoye Outdoor Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yongguan Adhesive Products Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Yongguan Adhesive Products Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Cy Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Cy Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bao-Wu(Tianjin) Import & Export Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bao-Wu(Tianjin) Import & Export Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026