zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Foshan Sanfeng Cell Phone Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Foshan Sanfeng Cell Phone Accessories Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong-based supplier of mobile phone accessories, with provided product listings focused on iPhone-related phone cases/accessories and low minimum order quantities ranging from 10 to 50 pieces. Based on the submitted data, the company shows strong production capacity, with a factory area of over 12,000㎡, more than 410 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is also strong, supported by 13 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and platform performance labels including 96.0% on-time delivery and response time within 2 hours. Commercial performance is solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥2M+ transaction value in the past six months, though the review base of 60+ and shop rating of 4.6 suggest room for further quality reputation strengthening. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established China-based phone accessory manufacturing with flexible MOQ and stable delivery performance, while quality assurance details such as Finished Product Inspection remain insufficiently disclosed.

Foshan Sanfeng Cell Phone Accessories Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company: Foshan Sanfeng Cell Phone Accessories Co., Ltd.
  • Location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 12,000+㎡
  • Employees: 410+ staff
  • Verified supplier / factory verification status: True

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a relatively strong manufacturing foundation based on the provided operational scale. A factory area exceeding 12,000㎡ and a workforce of more than 410 staff indicate that the company is not a small workshop-level supplier, but rather a larger production organization with meaningful production resources. The verified supplier status further strengthens the credibility of its factory profile, suggesting that at least some level of platform-side verification has been completed.

The product listings provided also indicate that the supplier handles multiple mobile phone accessory SKUs, particularly iPhone-related products, with low MOQ requirements. While the data does not provide detailed production lines, monthly output, equipment lists, R&D team size, or internal quality-control staffing, the available scale indicators support a conclusion that the company has stable production capacity.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 12,000+㎡ factory area, 410+ employees, and verified supplier status places this supplier in the large-scale or upper mid-scale category. The company appears capable of supporting continuous supply and multi-SKU production. However, because detailed production capacity, equipment, automation level, and factory audit reports are not provided, the score should not reach the absolute maximum.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Certification / platform labels:
  • On-time delivery 96.0%
  • Response time ≤2h
  • Verified supplier status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform presence, supported by 13 years as a Gold Supplier. A long Gold Supplier history is an important credibility indicator because it shows continuous platform participation over an extended period. Trade Assurance availability also improves buyer protection and reduces transaction risk, especially for international buyers who require payment and order security mechanisms.

The supplier also carries platform performance labels for on-time delivery and response time, which provide measurable operational indicators. The 96.0% on-time delivery rate is particularly strong from a procurement risk perspective. However, the provided data does not include additional formal certifications such as ISO, product safety certifications, environmental certifications, or detailed third-party audit documents. Therefore, the assessment should be based on platform credibility rather than broader compliance certification.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs strongly in this dimension due to its 13-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and visible performance labels. These elements form a credible platform-based trust structure. The only limitation is that the data does not provide broader factory certifications or product compliance certificates, so the score remains slightly below full marks.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 300+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥2M+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Number of reviews: 60+

Elaboration

The supplier shows solid recent commercial activity. More than 300 orders in the past six months indicates an active buyer base and recurring transaction flow. A transaction value of CN¥2M+ over the same period suggests that the supplier is not only receiving small trial orders but also generating meaningful sales volume.

The store rating of 4.6 is positive, but it is not at the very top end of typical platform performance. The review count of 60+ provides some level of market validation, though it is not exceptionally large relative to the order count. This means the supplier has demonstrated commercial traction, but the available customer feedback pool remains moderate rather than extensive.

Scoring Rationale

The company has a healthy commercial profile, supported by 300+ recent orders and CN¥2M+ transaction value. These figures indicate stable business performance and market acceptance. However, the 4.6 rating and 60+ reviews, while acceptable, do not fully support a top-tier score. The supplier appears commercially proven but not yet at the highest level of customer feedback strength.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Customization capability details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours indicates a relatively efficient communication process. For procurement teams, especially those sourcing from overseas, timely communication is important for quotation clarification, sample confirmation, artwork approval, delivery coordination, and after-sales issue handling.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization. No information is provided regarding OEM/ODM capability, packaging customization, logo printing, mold development, design support, private label services, or engineering support. Therefore, service capability can only be evaluated based on response speed, not on customization depth.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤2h is good, although it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1h. Since Full Customization and broader service capabilities are not confirmed in the provided data, the score should remain in the medium range. The supplier appears responsive, but its customization service strength cannot be fully validated.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 96.0%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 96.0% is a strong operational indicator. For buyers of mobile phone accessories, delivery reliability is particularly important because product demand may be linked to new phone model launches, seasonal campaigns, promotional events, and fast-moving e-commerce sales cycles.

A 96.0% on-time delivery rate suggests that the supplier has relatively effective order fulfillment control and logistics coordination. This is one of the strongest metrics in the provided supplier profile.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 96.0%, the supplier clearly falls into the highest delivery performance bracket. Since the data does not provide more granular information such as average lead time, late shipment causes, or peak-season performance, a full score is not automatically necessary, but the available metric is strong enough to justify the maximum score within this category.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Reviews: 60+
  • Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Additional quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s store rating of 4.6 indicates generally positive customer feedback. The review count of 60+ provides some customer validation, although it is not large enough to be considered an extensive review base. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company profile and supports a basic level of trust in the supplier’s operational identity.

However, the provided information does not confirm whether Finished Product Inspection is available. There is also no submitted data on internal quality-control procedures, defect rates, inspection standards, product testing, return rates, warranty handling, or third-party quality certifications. For procurement teams, these missing details are important, especially for phone accessories where fit, material quality, yellowing resistance, scratch resistance, packaging condition, and model compatibility can affect customer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good rating and some customer feedback, supported by verified supplier status. These factors justify a score above the basic level. However, the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and the moderate review volume prevent the supplier from reaching the top quality bracket. The quality profile is acceptable but not fully documented.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 18 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 86 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with quality-control confirmation before bulk orders.

Foshan Sanfeng Cell Phone Accessories Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers looking for an established China-based mobile phone accessory supplier with strong platform credibility, meaningful production scale, low MOQ options, and strong delivery reliability. The supplier appears especially appropriate for small to medium-sized importers, e-commerce sellers, distributors, promotional product buyers, and buyers requiring flexible order quantities for iPhone-related accessories.

The main strengths are its 12,000+㎡ factory scale, 410+ staff, 13-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, CN¥2M+ transaction value in the past six months, and 96.0% on-time delivery rate. These indicators show that the supplier has both production resources and commercial validation.

Key risks include Insufficient Data on Finished Product Inspection, detailed quality-control processes, product certifications, full customization capability, and formal factory audit documentation beyond the provided verified supplier status. Before placing large-volume orders, buyers should request samples, confirm inspection standards, clarify packaging and customization capabilities, and define acceptable quality limits in the purchase agreement.

Overall, the supplier has strong growth potential and is a credible sourcing candidate, particularly if the buyer implements standard pre-shipment inspection and sample approval procedures.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Foshan Chuanruida Clothing Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Chuanruida Clothing Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Accessories Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gt Accessories Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yane Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yane Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Sanqiang Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changshu Sanqiang Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dongye Automobile Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dongye Automobile Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou C&L Auto Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou C&L Auto Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Honghang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Honghang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ijoe Fashion And Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ijoe Fashion And Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chenyu Clothes And Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Chenyu Clothes And Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jincong Garment Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jincong Garment Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Xinyibang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuyao Xinyibang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Qinglin Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Qinglin Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Lichen Garment & Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shengzhou Lichen Garment & Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tiantai Dears Auto Accessories Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tiantai Dears Auto Accessories Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongbao Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongbao Automobile Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Fuzhixiang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Fuzhixiang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Huayang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Huayang Auto Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shengjie Car Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Shengjie Car Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhenshi Saidiwei Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhenshi Saidiwei Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Bao-Wu(Tianjin) Import & Export Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bao-Wu(Tianjin) Import & Export Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Techence Forging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Techence Forging Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Shangju Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Shangju Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yuqian Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yuqian Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shunxinjie Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shunxinjie Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Binge Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Binge Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Shellight Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Shellight Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sound Baby Star Acoustics Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Sound Baby Star Acoustics Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Deming Heathcare Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Deming Heathcare Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Xinyinmei Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Xinyinmei Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Zerui Automation Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Zerui Automation Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinyihong Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinyihong Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Aladdin Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Aladdin Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Prof.Ding Pharmatech Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Prof.Ding Pharmatech Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hong Kong Jingyu Clothing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hong Kong Jingyu Clothing Limited Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Meishuo Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Meishuo Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Baolun Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Baolun Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Bison Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Fengshang Ruicai Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Fengshang Ruicai Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Oppair Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Oppair Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026