Xi'An Aladdin Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Xi'an Aladdin Biological Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shaanxi, with a reported factory area of 4,100+ m² and 30+ staff. The company is presented as a verified supplier and has a strong platform history, including 14 years as a Gold Supplier and Trade Assurance support. Its listed product portfolio includes herbal extracts, root extracts, fruit juice powder, and OEM/ODM or private-label related product listings, with low minimum order quantities on several products. Commercial performance appears moderate, with 30+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.8 store rating and 20+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 96.0% on-time delivery rate. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume botanical extract or powder sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection. Key limitations include limited workforce scale, response time only within 4 hours, and insufficient data on finished product inspection, full customization capability, and specific factory certifications.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shaanxi, China.
- Factory area: 4,100+ m².
- Employee count: 30+ staff.
- Verified supplier status: True.
- Product listings include herbal extract, licorice root extract, kaempferia galanga root extract, orange juice powder, and OEM/ODM or private-label descriptions.

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical production base with a reported factory area above 4,100 m², which indicates a tangible operating site rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. However, the employee count of 30+ staff suggests a relatively small operational team compared with larger-scale manufacturers. The verified supplier status improves confidence in the existence and basic legitimacy of the business. Product listings show a focus on botanical extracts and powder-based products, but the data does not provide annual output, production lines, equipment details, warehouse capacity, or detailed factory audit results.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates basic-to-moderate production capability through its factory area, staff size, and verified supplier status. The factory area is meaningful, but the workforce remains limited, and no detailed production capacity data is provided. Therefore, it should not be rated as a large-scale stable supply chain. It fits best into the category of a small-to-mid-sized supplier with basic production capability and some operational credibility.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True.
- Gold Supplier duration: 14 years.
- Trade Assurance: True.
- Supplier verification: True.
- Certification / industry tags provided: “Response time ≤4h” and “On-time delivery 96.0%”.
- Specific factory certifications: Insufficient Data.
- Product-related terms appearing in listings include HALAL, ISO, and Organic, but no formal certificate documents are provided in the data.

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile, especially due to its 14-year Gold Supplier history and Trade Assurance support. A long Gold Supplier duration is a positive signal for continuity on the platform, while Trade Assurance gives buyers added transaction protection. Supplier verification further supports platform-level trust. However, the certification label data provided is limited mainly to response time and delivery performance. Although some product titles mention HALAL, ISO, and Organic, the data does not provide verified certificates, issuing bodies, certificate numbers, or validity periods, so these cannot be treated as confirmed compliance credentials.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs strongly in platform credibility because it combines long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. The main limitation is incomplete evidence for formal factory or product certifications beyond platform indicators. As a result, the company deserves a high score, but not a maximum score, because compliance documentation is not fully evidenced in the provided data.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past six months: 30+.
- Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥135.2K+.
- Store rating: 4.8.
- Review count: 20+.

Elaboration
The supplier has measurable recent transaction activity, with more than 30 orders and over CN¥135.2K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active commercial engagement rather than a dormant or unverified storefront. The 4.8 rating is positive and suggests generally favorable buyer satisfaction. However, the review count of 20+ is not large, and the six-month transaction value appears moderate rather than high. The data does not include repeat buyer rate, export markets, buyer concentration, or year-over-year sales trend.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows stable but not high-volume business performance. The order count and transaction amount support a moderate commercial track record, while the 4.8 rating strengthens confidence in buyer satisfaction. However, the relatively limited review base and moderate transaction value prevent classification as a high-order, high-transaction supplier.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h.
- Platform tag: “Response time ≤4h”.
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data.
- Product listings include OEM/ODM and private-label wording, but the provided service capability data does not explicitly confirm full customization support.

Elaboration
The supplier’s stated response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for sourcing inquiries and quotation follow-up. The product listings include OEM/ODM and private-label related terms, which may suggest customization-related offerings at the product-listing level. However, the required assessment specifically considers Full Customization, and the provided dataset does not explicitly confirm this service capability. There is also no information on sample handling speed, technical support, design support, formulation support, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a reasonable response time, but it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. Because full customization capability is not directly confirmed, the score should remain in the normal service range rather than the highest range. The available evidence supports adequate communication capability but not advanced service capability.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 96.0%.
- Platform tag also states: “On-time delivery 96.0%”.

Elaboration
A 96.0% on-time delivery rate is a strong delivery indicator and exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest scoring band. This suggests that the supplier has reliable order fulfillment performance on the platform. The delivery data is directly stated and consistent across the delivery performance field and platform tag. However, the dataset does not include average lead time, shipment volume, logistics channels, late-shipment reasons, or performance by order size.

Scoring Rationale
Based on the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9 to 10 points. The supplier’s 96.0% performance is clearly strong. Since supporting logistics details are limited, a near-maximum rather than perfect score is more appropriate.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.8.
- Review count: 20+.
- Verified supplier status: True.
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data.
- Factory Verification: Supplier verification is stated as True, but detailed factory verification documentation is not provided.
- Specific quality certifications or inspection reports: Insufficient Data.

Elaboration
The supplier’s 4.8 store rating is a positive quality-related signal, and 20+ reviews provide some level of buyer feedback. Verified supplier status adds basic credibility, but the data does not confirm a finished product inspection process, third-party quality control, batch testing, quality management certification, or detailed factory verification records. The review volume is also relatively limited, meaning the rating is useful but not broad enough to represent a large customer feedback base.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has favorable customer feedback but limited quality assurance evidence. A 4.8 rating supports a good quality perception, yet the review count is modest and there is insufficient data on finished product inspection or formal quality systems. Therefore, the supplier fits the “good rating with limited quality-system evidence” range rather than the highest category.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order exposure. Xi'an Aladdin Biological Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume sourcing of botanical extracts, herbal extract products, fruit powder products, or OEM/ODM/private-label listed items through Trade Assurance. The supplier’s strongest advantages are its 14-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 96.0% on-time delivery rate, and positive 4.8 store rating.

The main risks are limited operational scale, with only 30+ staff reported; moderate six-month transaction value; limited review volume; and insufficient data on full customization capability, finished product inspection, formal factory certifications, and documented quality control systems. Buyers should request certification documents, product specifications, COA or inspection reports, sample validation, and written customization terms before placing larger orders.

Overall, the supplier shows credible platform presence and reliable delivery performance, with growth potential for buyers that can verify quality documentation and start with trial or phased purchasing.