Xi An Green Source Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Xi An Green Source Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shaanxi, with a reported factory area of 1,000+ sqm and 30+ staff. The company appears to be a small-scale but operational supplier, supported by verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 2 years, Trade Assurance, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability. Its listed products are mainly natural/herbal extract-related items and coffee-related products, with low minimum order quantities of 1 kilogram, making it potentially suitable for small-batch buyers, product testing, and early-stage sourcing programs. Business performance is modest, with 10+ orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value over the past six months, although the store rating of 4.8 and 100% on-time shipment rate are positive indicators. Overall, this supplier is more appropriate for buyers prioritizing flexible MOQ, customization support, and verified platform protection rather than large-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shaanxi, China
- Factory area: 1,000+ sqm
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has disclosed a physical factory scale of over 1,000 sqm and a workforce of more than 30 staff. This indicates the presence of basic production and operational capacity, but the scale remains relatively limited compared with medium or large manufacturing suppliers. The verified supplier status provides some credibility regarding the existence and basic operational profile of the company.

Scoring Rationale
The company does not show indicators of a large-scale supply chain, such as a large factory area, high employee count, or extensive production capacity data. However, the combination of a disclosed factory size, staff base, and verified supplier status supports the conclusion that it has fundamental production capability. The appropriate assessment is therefore “small but with basic production capacity.”

Final Score
12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification/industry labels: Finished product inspection, Full customization, Minor customization, ODM service available

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. The 2-year Gold Supplier tenure is relatively short but still provides a basic platform track record. The available labels also show that the supplier has declared product inspection and customization-related capabilities on the platform.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core credibility elements expected for a usable supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which limits the strength of long-term platform credibility. The certification and service labels are useful, but no additional external certifications are provided in the data.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥6.7K+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 10+

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded recent platform activity, but the order volume and transaction value are relatively low. A 4.8 store rating is positive, yet the review base of 10+ is still limited, meaning the rating should be interpreted cautiously. The available data suggests some market validation, but not enough to demonstrate strong or high-volume commercial performance.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows active transactions and positive customer ratings, but both order count and transaction value remain modest. The limited number of reviews also reduces confidence in the depth of customer validation. This places the supplier in the lower-to-moderate range for business performance rather than a high-performing commercial supplier.

Final Score
12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤2h
- Platform labels: Full customization, Minor customization, ODM service available

Elaboration
The reported response time of within 2 hours indicates reasonably efficient communication. The supplier also lists multiple customization-related capabilities, including full customization, minor customization, and ODM service availability. This suggests that the supplier may be suitable for buyers requiring product adjustment or customized sourcing support, subject to further confirmation during inquiry.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier does not meet the highest service benchmark of response time within 1 hour, but ≤2h is still a positive indicator. The availability of full customization and ODM service strengthens its service profile. Based on the provided data, the supplier demonstrates above-basic service capability but not the maximum level.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. This suggests that, based on available platform data, the supplier has been able to meet shipment timing commitments for recorded transactions.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension. However, the interpretation should still consider that the total recent order base is only 10+ orders.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 10+
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.8 and lists Finished Product Inspection, which is a positive quality-related platform label. Verified supplier status also supports baseline trust in the supplier profile. However, the review count is only 10+, so the customer feedback base is not large enough to fully validate long-term consistency.

Scoring Rationale
The quality indicators are generally positive, especially the high rating and the presence of Finished Product Inspection. Still, the limited number of reviews restricts confidence in broad customer satisfaction and repeat performance. The supplier therefore fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance” category rather than the top tier with high review volume and extensive validation.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

73 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small-batch procurement, product sampling, customized product development, and early-stage supplier testing. The supplier is especially suitable for buyers who value low MOQ, Trade Assurance protection, responsive communication, and customization options.

Key risks include limited business scale, relatively low recent transaction value, small review base, and limited disclosed factory capacity. The supplier has positive delivery and platform credibility indicators, but it has not yet demonstrated strong large-volume commercial performance based on the provided data.

Growth potential exists due to its customization labels, 100% on-time shipment rate, verified supplier status, and positive store rating. For procurement use, buyers should start with sample orders or controlled small-volume trial orders before moving to larger purchasing commitments.