Qingdao Jinyazhiguan Hatting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Qingdao Jinyazhiguan Hatting Co., Ltd. is a China-based hat and cap supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 2,500+㎡ and 80+ staff. The company appears to operate as a small-to-medium manufacturing supplier with verified supplier status, 9 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, Socially responsible, Warranty available, and 3D design capabilities. Its listed products focus on caps and hats, including sunshade caps, snapback caps, flat bill caps, and custom logo / 3D embroidery styles.

Commercially, the supplier shows solid recent activity, with 100+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 30+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 92.6% on-time shipment rate. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking verified cap suppliers with moderate production capacity, customization-related offerings, and reliable platform protection. Key caution points include limited review volume and insufficient explicit data on full customization capability.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company name: Qingdao Jinyazhiguan Hatting Co., Ltd.
• Location: Shandong, China
• Factory area: 2,500+㎡
• Employees: 80+ staff
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported factory area of more than 2,500 square meters and over 80 employees, indicating a functional manufacturing base with basic-to-moderate production scale. The company is not positioned as a large-scale industrial manufacturer based on the available data, but the combination of factory space, workforce size, and verified supplier status suggests it has a stable operating foundation.

The verified supplier status provides additional credibility regarding the existence and basic operational profile of the company. However, no additional factory audit details, production line count, annual output, machinery list, or formal factory certification information is provided. Therefore, the assessment of production strength must remain limited to the stated factory size, employee count, and supplier verification status.

Scoring Rationale

A factory area of 2,500+㎡ and 80+ employees supports classification as a small-to-medium manufacturer with established production capability. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence in its operational legitimacy. However, the available scale does not indicate a large supply chain operation, and there is insufficient data on production capacity, automation level, factory certifications, or audit results beyond the verified supplier flag. Therefore, the supplier fits best within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry labels:
• Socially responsible
• Warranty available
• 3D design capabilities
• Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 9 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance availability provides additional transaction protection for buyers, especially for payment and order fulfillment risk control. The verified supplier status further supports platform-level legitimacy.

The listed labels also improve compliance and operational credibility. “Finished product inspection” is particularly relevant to quality control, while “Warranty available” indicates after-sales support availability. “Socially responsible” and “3D design capabilities” are positive platform tags, though the specific audit scope, standards, or certifying bodies are not provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a complete and credible platform profile: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple platform labels. A 9-year Gold Supplier record places it in a relatively mature and trustworthy category. The only limitation is that the dataset does not provide detailed third-party certification documents or audit reports beyond platform labels. Overall, the platform credibility is strong and close to the top range.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.2M+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 30+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded over 100 orders and more than CN¥1.2 million in transaction value over the past six months. This indicates active commercial performance and a meaningful level of recent buyer demand. The 4.9 store rating is strong and suggests positive customer satisfaction among reviewed transactions.

However, the number of reviews is 30+, which is supportive but not extremely large. While the recent order and transaction figures are solid, the review base is still moderate, meaning the available public feedback sample is not extensive enough to fully validate performance across a wide customer base.

Scoring Rationale

The business data reflects stable and healthy commercial activity. The six-month transaction value of CN¥1.2M+ and 100+ orders demonstrate that the supplier is not inactive or unproven. The 4.9 rating is a strong positive signal. However, because the review count is only 30+, the supplier does not fully reach the highest performance tier that would normally require both high transaction activity and a large volume of customer feedback. A score in the upper-middle range is appropriate.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤5h
• Full Customization: Insufficient Data
• Product listings include customization-related items such as custom logo and 3D embroidery styles
• Platform label: 3D design capabilities

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is stated as within 5 hours, which indicates acceptable communication responsiveness but not top-tier speed. For a strong service score, response time of one hour or less would normally provide stronger evidence of high communication efficiency.

The product list includes custom logo caps and 3D embroidery styles, and the supplier has a platform label for 3D design capabilities. These are positive indicators for customization-related service capability. However, there is no explicit data confirming “Full Customization” support. Therefore, the assessment cannot assume full customization capacity beyond the information provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates reasonable service capability through acceptable response time and customization-related product offerings. However, because the response time is not within one hour and Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the supplier should not be scored in the highest service tier. The available data supports a normal-to-good service capability level, with some customization support indicated but not fully verified.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 92.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time shipment rate is 92.6%, which exceeds the 90% benchmark for strong delivery performance. This suggests that the supplier is generally reliable in meeting shipment timelines on the platform.

Delivery reliability is an important procurement factor, especially for seasonal, promotional, or event-driven cap orders. A rate above 90% indicates that the supplier has relatively good order execution discipline. However, the data does not provide details such as average lead time, delay causes, logistics methods, or performance by order size.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. The 92.6% result is strong, but not close enough to perfect to justify a maximum score. The lack of additional delivery data also prevents a more aggressive rating. Therefore, a strong but not perfect score is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 30+
• Finished product inspection: Listed
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a strong positive signal for customer satisfaction. The presence of a Finished Product Inspection label adds quality assurance credibility, indicating that the supplier has some form of inspection process associated with finished goods.

The verified supplier status also strengthens trust in the supplier’s basic operational profile. However, the review count of 30+ is moderate rather than extensive. Additionally, the dataset does not provide defect rates, inspection standards, sample approval procedures, return rates, or third-party quality audit reports. As a result, while the supplier shows good quality indicators, the evidence base is not comprehensive enough for the highest score range.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has strong quality-related signals: a high rating, platform verification, and Finished Product Inspection. These factors support confidence in basic product quality and customer satisfaction. The main limitation is the relatively limited number of reviews and lack of detailed quality system documentation. Therefore, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance” category rather than the top category requiring large-scale feedback and fully documented quality systems.

Final Score

17 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with standard procurement controls.

Qingdao Jinyazhiguan Hatting Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking caps and hats from a verified China-based supplier with moderate factory scale, strong platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, and solid recent transaction performance. The supplier is particularly appropriate for small-to-medium buyers, promotional product buyers, apparel accessory brands, and customers requiring cap products such as snapback caps, sunshade caps, flat bill caps, and custom logo / embroidery-related styles.

Key strengths include 9 years of Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, 92.6% on-time shipment rate, CN¥1.2M+ recent transaction value, and a 4.9 store rating.

Main risks include moderate review volume, lack of detailed factory audit or production capacity data, and insufficient explicit confirmation of Full Customization capability. Buyers should verify customization scope, sample quality, production lead time, inspection standards, and bulk order capacity before placing large or complex orders.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential and can be considered a reliable mid-level cap supplier for controlled trial orders and scalable cooperation if initial quality and delivery performance meet buyer requirements.