zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Agrok Netting Cooperative (Wudi) Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Agrok Netting Cooperative (wudi) is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 1,500+ m² and 50+ staff. The company appears to operate as a small-to-medium production supplier focused on HDPE fishing, aquaculture, foldable trap, and drying net products, with relatively low MOQ options across several listed products. Its profile shows strong platform credibility, including 12 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, and customization-related tags. Commercial performance is moderate-to-strong, supported by 60+ orders and CN¥4.8M+ transaction value over the past six months, although the review base is limited at only 6 reviews and the store rating is 4.4. Service response time is within 5 hours, but no data confirms full customization capability. Delivery performance is strong with a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking verified platform-backed sourcing with flexible MOQ requirements, while quality confidence should be validated through samples or inspection due to limited customer feedback volume.

Agrok Netting Cooperative (wudi)

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 1,500+ m²
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product range includes HDPE fishing traps, aquaculture traps, crab/shrimp traps, and drying nets

Elaboration:
The supplier has a defined physical production base with more than 1,500 m² of factory area and over 50 staff. This indicates an operating factory with basic production capacity rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The available product listings show a focused product scope around fishing, aquaculture, and net-based products, suggesting some degree of category specialization. However, the provided data does not show large-scale industrial capacity, advanced equipment, production lines, annual output, or third-party factory certifications beyond verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates stable small-to-medium factory capability, supported by a verified supplier status, physical factory scale, and employee base. However, the factory size and staffing level are not sufficient to classify it as a large-scale supply chain. Since there is no additional data on production capacity, machinery, export volume, or factory certifications, the score should remain in the mid-range rather than the top tier.

Final Score: 15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Low MOQ for customization, Finished Product Inspection, Minor customization

Elaboration:
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 12 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection for buyers, while verified supplier status provides an additional platform credibility layer. The listed tags also include Finished Product Inspection and customization-related capabilities, although the data only confirms minor customization and low MOQ customization, not full customization. No external compliance certifications or product-specific regulatory certifications are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status create a strong platform credibility profile. The certification and service tags are relatively complete for platform-based sourcing. The score does not reach the absolute maximum because the provided data does not include independent compliance certificates, product certifications, or detailed audit reports beyond the platform-level verification.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in the past six months: 60+
- Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥4.8M+
- Store rating: 4.4
- Number of reviews: 6

Elaboration:
The supplier shows meaningful recent transaction activity, with more than 60 orders and over CN¥4.8M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates that the supplier has active commercial operations and is not an inactive or untested storefront. However, the review count is low at only 6, which limits the reliability of customer feedback as a broad market validation signal. The store rating of 4.4 is acceptable but not at a top-tier level.

Scoring Rationale:
The transaction amount is relatively strong and the order count shows active buyer engagement. However, the limited review volume weakens the evidence base for consistent customer satisfaction, and the 4.4 rating is moderate rather than excellent. This supports a stable mid-to-upper score, but not a top score reserved for suppliers with high order volume, high transaction value, high ratings, and substantial review history.

Final Score: 16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤5h
- Customization-related tags: Low MOQ for customization, Minor customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within 5 hours indicates acceptable communication speed, though it is slower than the highest service benchmark of one hour or less. The platform tags confirm some customization flexibility, specifically low MOQ customization and minor customization. However, there is no data confirming full customization capability, engineering support, design development, multilingual sales support, or dedicated project management.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier appears capable of basic service support and minor customization, which is useful for buyers with low-volume or small adjustment requirements. The absence of confirmed full customization and the response time being above one hour prevent a higher score. The service capability is therefore solid but not advanced.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The reported on-time dispatch rate is 100.0%, which is a strong indicator of delivery discipline on the platform. Based on the available data, the supplier has met dispatch timelines consistently. However, the data only covers on-time dispatch rate and does not provide details on actual international transit performance, logistics channels, lead times, production cycle stability, or performance under large-volume orders.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for a 9–10 score range. A 100.0% rate supports the maximum score within this dimension. The score is based strictly on the reported dispatch metric, while broader logistics reliability remains unverified due to insufficient supporting data.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.4
- Number of reviews: 6
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a listed Finished Product Inspection tag, which indicates some level of quality control before shipment. Verified supplier status also adds confidence that the company has passed platform-level verification. However, the customer feedback base is limited, with only 6 reviews, making it difficult to assess quality consistency across a broad buyer population. The store rating of 4.4 is generally acceptable but not high enough to indicate outstanding customer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale:
The presence of Finished Product Inspection and supplier verification supports a baseline quality assurance framework. However, the limited review count and moderate rating reduce confidence in repeatable quality performance. The supplier does not have enough customer feedback evidence to justify a high quality score, so the evaluation should remain in the middle range.

Final Score: 14 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 81 / 100

  • Company Strength: 15 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19 / 20
  • Business Performance: 16 / 20
  • Service Capability: 7 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 14 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled risk management. Agrok Netting Cooperative (wudi) is suitable for buyers seeking HDPE fishing, aquaculture trap, crab/shrimp trap, and net-related products with low MOQ flexibility, platform-backed transaction protection, and reliable dispatch performance. The supplier is particularly suitable for small-to-medium buyers, trial orders, and buyers who value Trade Assurance and verified supplier status.

The main risks are the limited customer review base, moderate 4.4 store rating, and lack of provided data on full customization, detailed production capacity, independent certifications, or large-scale quality systems. Buyers should request samples, confirm product specifications, use Trade Assurance, and consider Finished Product Inspection before bulk purchasing.

Growth potential is positive due to the supplier’s 12-year Gold Supplier history, active recent transaction value, 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, and customization-related tags. However, broader quality confidence will depend on additional buyer feedback, sample validation, and more transparent production or certification data.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Wudi Jinhai Fishing Tackle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wudi Jinhai Fishing Tackle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Anping Yong Sheng Wire And Netting Making Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Anping Yong Sheng Wire And Netting Making Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
100 Horse Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
100 Horse Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
G And N Fortune Limited Supplier Evaluation
G And N Fortune Limited Supplier Evaluation
Richtek Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Richtek Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cemoto Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Cemoto Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yesfan Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yesfan Limited Supplier Evaluation
Deko Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Deko Corporation Supplier Evaluation
X.J. Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
X.J. Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Healthife Llc Supplier Evaluation
Healthife Llc Supplier Evaluation
Yueli Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yueli Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou J&H Storefixture Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Demax Group Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Demax Group Supplier Evaluation
Kwinpack Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kwinpack Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Botanical Cube Inc Supplier Evaluation
Botanical Cube Inc Supplier Evaluation
Foodmate Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foodmate Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foodchem International Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Foodchem International Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Vastrade Manufacturing Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Vastrade Manufacturing Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Sinocare Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Sinocare Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Great Reputation Packings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Great Reputation Packings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Cao County Jiusi Woods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cao County Jiusi Woods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai National Resources & Jingjie Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai National Resources & Jingjie Printing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaihongyu Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kaihongyu Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Corey Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Corey Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Golden River Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Golden River Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Maydos Building Materials Limited Company Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Maydos Building Materials Limited Company Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Qiyigifts Metal & Plastic Factory Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Qiyigifts Metal & Plastic Factory Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Ange Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Ange Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Fuxin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Fuxin Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Prestressed Building Materials Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Prestressed Building Materials Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yangjiang Hehui Industry & Trade Co. Supplier Evaluation
Yangjiang Hehui Industry & Trade Co. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Menred Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Menred Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Infinitas Food Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Infinitas Food Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Kingzest (Shenyang) Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kingzest (Shenyang) Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ruopei Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Ruopei Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Wanli Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Wanli Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Longcheng Sealing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Longcheng Sealing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Meicheng Machinery Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongqing Meicheng Machinery Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tang Mu Sen Oil(Guang Dong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tang Mu Sen Oil(Guang Dong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lachoi Scientific Instrument (Shaoxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lachoi Scientific Instrument (Shaoxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026