Hebei Anping Yong Sheng Wire And Netting Making Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Hebei Anping Yong Sheng Wire And Netting Making Co., Ltd. is a China-based wire mesh and fencing supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of 13,000+ m² and 50+ staff. The supplier shows moderate manufacturing capacity and has platform-backed credibility through 12 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and listed service/quality tags including finished product inspection, full customization, minor customization, and warranty availability. Its product range in the provided data focuses on galvanized steel wire, field fence, welded wire mesh, bridge anti-throw netting, and stadium wire mesh, with low MOQs of 1 roll or 1 piece. However, commercial performance is weak based on the available data: only 1 order and CN¥341.6+ transaction value in the past six months, with no store rating and 0 reviews. This supplier appears more suitable for small-volume trial purchases, customized fencing projects, or buyers prioritizing verified platform credentials over proven recent transaction volume.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 13,000+ m²
- Employees: 50+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Hebei, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with a factory area above 13,000 m², which indicates a meaningful operating footprint for wire mesh and fencing manufacturing. The staff size of 50+ suggests a small-to-mid-sized factory rather than a large-scale industrial group. Verified supplier status provides a basic level of confidence that the company has undergone platform-related verification.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates stable foundational production capacity, supported by factory size and verified supplier status. However, the employee scale is moderate, and the provided data does not include detailed production lines, annual capacity, machinery quantity, export volume, or factory audit reports beyond the verification flag. Therefore, it fits best within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the highest large-scale supply-chain tier.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, Full customization, Minor customization

Elaboration
The supplier has a long platform presence, with 12 years as a Gold Supplier, which is a strong credibility indicator within the provided -related data. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection for buyers. The listed tags also indicate that the supplier provides certain service and quality-related capabilities, including warranty availability and finished product inspection.

Scoring Rationale
This is one of the supplier’s strongest areas. A 12-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status together create a relatively complete platform credibility profile. While no external certificates, third-party factory audit documents, or industry-specific compliance certifications are provided, the available platform information is strong and long-standing.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 1
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥341.6+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The available commercial activity is very limited. Only one order is recorded in the past six months, and the transaction value is low. No store rating is provided, and the review count is 0, which means there is no customer feedback base available in the supplied data to validate transaction consistency or buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
Although the supplier has strong platform tenure, its recent business performance data is weak. The low order count, low transaction amount, missing store rating, and absence of reviews make it difficult to confirm current market acceptance or repeat purchasing behavior. This places the supplier below the normal commercial validation range.

Final Score
8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤4h
- Full customization: Listed
- Minor customization: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier provides both full customization and minor customization according to the supplied platform tags, which is valuable for fencing and wire mesh buyers requiring size, gauge, coating, or application-specific adjustments. The response time of ≤4 hours is acceptable, though not at the fastest level.

Scoring Rationale
The customization capability is a positive factor, especially for project-based procurement. However, the response time does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Also, there is no provided data on multilingual support, technical drawing capability, sample lead time, or project communication process. Therefore, the service capability is solid but not top-tier.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier shows a 100.0% on-time delivery rate in the provided data. This is a strong delivery indicator and suggests that recorded shipments have been completed on schedule.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided figure is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score in this category. However, the interpretation should be balanced against the low recent order count, as only limited transaction activity is available.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These elements suggest that basic quality-control and platform verification mechanisms exist. However, there is no store rating and no customer review data, which limits the ability to assess actual buyer satisfaction or product consistency from transaction feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has basic quality assurance signals but lacks customer feedback validation. Finished product inspection and verified supplier status support a moderate score, but the absence of ratings and reviews prevents the supplier from qualifying for the higher quality tiers. The quality system appears present, but customer-confirmed performance remains insufficiently evidenced.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

73 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended, mainly for small-volume trial orders, customized wire mesh or fencing projects, and buyers who value long platform history and Trade Assurance protection. The supplier’s main strengths are 12-year Gold Supplier status, verified supplier profile, Trade Assurance support, 13,000+ m² factory area, customization capability, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate.

Key risks are weak recent business validation, only 1 order in the past six months, low transaction value, missing store rating, and 0 reviews. Buyers should start with sample orders or low-risk pilot purchases before scaling procurement. Growth potential exists if the supplier can convert its platform credibility and factory base into higher transaction volume, more customer reviews, and clearer quality performance records.