zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Hangzhou Pinzhu New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Hangzhou Pinzhu New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, offering light gauge steel framing and drywall metal stud/track products with listed MOQs of 1,000 meters. The company shows a basic manufacturing foundation, with a reported factory area of 5,300+ m², 20+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform profile includes 3 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, Full Customization, and Minor Customization. Commercial activity is present but limited, with 10+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months. However, the store rating of 3.5 and only 2 reviews indicate weak customer feedback depth. Delivery performance is moderate, with an on-time shipment rate of 85.7%. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume procurement with customization needs, but further quality validation and sample testing are recommended before large-scale cooperation.

Hangzhou Pinzhu New Material Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 5,300+ m²
- Employee count: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Zhejiang, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a documented physical factory area and a small workforce. A 5,300+ m² facility suggests it has some production space for metal framing or related building material products, while the 20+ staff count indicates a relatively lean operating structure. The verified supplier status provides a degree of credibility regarding the existence and basic legitimacy of the business.

Scoring Rationale
The company does not appear to be a large-scale manufacturing operation based on the provided employee count. However, the factory area and verified supplier status show that it has more than a minimal trading presence and likely maintains basic production or supply capability. The available data supports classification as a small factory with foundational capacity, but not enough evidence for a medium or large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Full Customization, Minor Customization
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform trust indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The 3-year Gold Supplier duration is positive but not long enough to indicate a long-established platform history. The listed inspection and customization tags add credibility, particularly for buyers requiring tailored specifications or inspection-supported transactions.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has core platform credibility elements in place: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the Gold Supplier history is moderate rather than long-term, and no additional third-party factory audit certificate, ISO certification, or industry-specific compliance certification is provided in the data. Therefore, the platform credibility is solid but not at the highest level.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 10+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥338K+
- Store rating: 3.5
- Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded commercial activity over the past six months, with 10+ orders and CN¥338K+ in transaction value. This indicates some market validation and recent buyer engagement. However, the order count is not high, and the customer review base is very limited. A store rating of 3.5 is moderate and does not strongly demonstrate high buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction value shows the supplier is commercially active, but the low review count and moderate rating limit confidence in repeatability and customer satisfaction. The available business performance data is stronger than a completely unverified supplier but remains below the level expected from a high-performing store with strong order volume, high rating, and broad customer feedback.

Final Score
11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Listed
- Minor Customization: Listed
- ODM service available: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier provides a response time of within 4 hours, which is acceptable for international sourcing communication but not at the fastest level. The presence of Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service availability suggests the supplier can support customized requirements, although the data does not specify engineering depth, design support process, or project management capability.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates reasonable service capability due to acceptable response speed and multiple customization-related platform tags. However, because response time is not within 1 hour and no detailed service workflow or technical support evidence is provided, the score should remain in the upper-middle range rather than the top tier.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 85.7%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time shipment rate falls within the 80–89% band. This shows generally functional delivery performance but also indicates that delays may occur in a meaningful minority of orders. For buyers with strict construction project timelines, this delivery record should be reviewed carefully before placing large or time-sensitive orders.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time shipment rate of 80–89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 85.7%, the supplier sits in the middle-to-upper part of this band. The delivery performance is acceptable but not strong enough to be considered highly reliable.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 3.5
- Number of reviews: 2
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a Finished Product Inspection tag, which is a positive quality-control indicator. Verified supplier status also supports basic credibility. However, the customer feedback base is very limited, with only 2 reviews, and the store rating of 3.5 is not strong. No detailed defect rate, inspection standard, product test report, material certification, or third-party quality certification is provided.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, especially Finished Product Inspection, but the limited review count and moderate rating reduce confidence in consistent quality performance. Since customer feedback data is thin and no detailed quality certification is provided, this dimension should be rated as basic-to-moderate rather than strong.

Final Score
12 / 20

Total Score

68 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small-to-medium volume buyers seeking drywall metal studs, light gauge steel framing, keel frames, or related metal track products, especially where customization support is required. The supplier has a verified platform presence, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, and acceptable communication speed, making it suitable for initial sourcing trials.

However, it is not yet ideal for large-scale or high-risk procurement without further verification. Main risk points include the small staff size, limited customer review base, moderate 3.5 store rating, and only 85.7% on-time shipment performance. Buyers should request samples, confirm specifications, verify inspection standards, and use Trade Assurance before scaling orders.

Growth potential exists because the supplier has platform credibility, customization tags, and recent transaction activity, but stronger customer feedback, higher delivery reliability, and more transparent quality documentation would be needed to support higher procurement confidence.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Hangzhou Lux New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Lux New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Oufei New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Oufei New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangxin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangxin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Marlboro New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Marlboro New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Aorunde New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Aorunde New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Vnovo New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Vnovo New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gmark New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gmark New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Emf New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Emf New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tongguang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tongguang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Qingdao Yilu Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Yilu Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Changyuetong Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Changyuetong Electric Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongcan Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongcan Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fs Circuit (Shenzhen) Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Fs Circuit (Shenzhen) Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Forever Print Paper Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Forever Print Paper Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Guanglei Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Guanglei Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huimin County Chaozhan Chemical Fiber Rope Net Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huimin County Chaozhan Chemical Fiber Rope Net Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Lan Tian Lu Zhi You Environmental Sanitation Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Lan Tian Lu Zhi You Environmental Sanitation Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Oriole Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Oriole Jewelry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Waton Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Waton Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Hengxin Boiler Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Hengxin Boiler Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jtld Industrial & Commercial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Jtld Industrial & Commercial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Image Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Image Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Feier Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Nanhai Feier Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Membrane Switch Factory Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Membrane Switch Factory Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Xihui Import And Export Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Xihui Import And Export Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Top One Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Top One Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tengxin Seal Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tengxin Seal Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Double Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Double Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026