zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 8,500+ sqm and 20+ staff. The company appears to focus on adhesive, silicone sealant, MS adhesive, PU adhesive, and nail-free glue products, with low minimum order quantities across several listed items. Its platform profile shows 3 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, response time within 1 hour, and 100.0% on-time delivery. Commercial activity is moderate, with 20+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating but only 10 reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking flexible MOQ adhesive and sealant sourcing, trial orders, or small-to-medium procurement volumes. Key limitations include limited employee scale, relatively low review count, and insufficient data on customization capability, finished product inspection, and specific factory certification details.

Detailed Analysis

Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd.

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 8,500+ sqm
- Employee count: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory certification details: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier reports a factory area of more than 8,500 sqm, which indicates a meaningful physical production base. However, the employee count of 20+ staff suggests a relatively lean operational structure rather than a large-scale manufacturing workforce. The verified supplier status improves confidence that the company has passed a platform-level verification process, but the available data does not specify whether it holds formal factory certifications, quality management certifications, or third-party audit reports.

Scoring Rationale
The factory area is stronger than the employee scale, creating a mixed profile: the company has a visible production footprint but limited evidence of large workforce capacity. Verified supplier status supports basic operational credibility, but the absence of detailed factory certification data prevents a higher score. Based on the scoring criteria, this supplier fits best into the “small to medium-sized factory with basic production capability” range rather than a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 3 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤1h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Detailed compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, 3 years of supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are meaningful trust signals for international buyers using ’s sourcing environment. The listed tags also support platform performance credibility, especially fast response and perfect on-time delivery. However, the available certification labels do not include detailed third-party compliance certifications, industry-specific approvals, or documented factory audit scope.

Scoring Rationale
The company has a solid platform credibility foundation, with Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification all present. The 3-year Gold Supplier duration is positive but not long enough to qualify as a long-established platform supplier. Since the core trust mechanisms are in place but certification depth is not fully demonstrated, the score falls within the range for suppliers with core platform credibility but limited long-term or comprehensive compliance evidence.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Review count: 10

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 20 orders and over CN¥135.2K in transaction value during the past six months. This shows active commercial transactions but not a high-volume sales profile. The 4.9 store rating is strong and indicates positive buyer satisfaction among recorded reviews. However, the review count is only 10, which limits the statistical strength of the rating and makes it difficult to fully validate performance consistency across a wider customer base.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction data shows real marketplace activity and a good customer rating, but both order quantity and review count remain relatively modest. The CN¥135.2K+ transaction value suggests some business traction, yet it does not represent a high-volume or highly mature commercial record. The supplier is therefore best assessed as having stable but limited business validation.

Final Score
14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- Platform tag: “Response time ≤1h”
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response speed: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is listed as within 1 hour, which is a strong indicator of communication speed and buyer responsiveness. This is especially useful for buyers requiring quick quotation cycles, product clarification, or order coordination. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, private labeling, packaging customization, formulation adjustment, or other value-added service capabilities.

Scoring Rationale
The fast response time supports a strong service score, but the absence of customization data prevents a top-tier rating. According to the scoring standard, a 9–10 score requires both response time within 1 hour and strong customization capability. Since only response speed is confirmed, the supplier is rated as having good basic service capability but insufficient evidence of advanced service depth.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest available delivery performance indicator in the provided data. This suggests that, based on platform-recorded performance, the supplier has met shipment timing commitments for recorded orders. No additional data is provided on lead time, production capacity under peak demand, logistics methods, or shipment delay history.

Scoring Rationale
The scoring standard assigns 9–10 points for suppliers with an on-time delivery rate above 90%. Since the supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, it qualifies for the highest delivery performance range. The score is strong, though not supported by further logistics or lead-time details.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Review count: 10
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True / verified supplier status provided
- Detailed quality management system: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The store rating of 4.9 is positive and suggests favorable customer feedback from existing buyers. However, the review count is only 10, which limits the reliability of the rating as a broad quality indicator. Verified supplier status provides some level of confidence in supplier legitimacy, but there is no explicit data confirming Finished Product Inspection, formal quality control procedures, product testing standards, or quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The high rating supports a positive assessment, but the small number of reviews and missing inspection-system data reduce confidence in consistent quality control. The supplier has basic quality credibility through platform verification and customer rating, but the lack of Finished Product Inspection information and limited feedback volume prevent it from reaching the higher scoring range.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

75 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order exposure. Weifang Baolijia New Material Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking adhesive, silicone sealant, MS adhesive, PU adhesive, and nail-free glue products with flexible MOQ options and fast communication. The supplier is especially appropriate for trial orders, sample purchasing, small-to-medium batch procurement, and buyers who value Trade Assurance and platform transaction protection.

The main risks are limited employee scale, relatively modest six-month order volume, low review count, and insufficient data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, formal factory certifications, and detailed quality control systems. These gaps mean buyers should verify product specifications, packaging requirements, inspection procedures, and production lead times before placing larger orders.

The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its 8,500+ sqm factory area, verified supplier status, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, fast response time, and 4.9 store rating. A staged procurement approach is advisable: begin with samples or small trial orders, evaluate product consistency and communication accuracy, then gradually increase order volume if quality and delivery performance remain stable.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Weifang Aorunde New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Aorunde New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Shufukang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Shufukang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Tianyuan Waterproof Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Tianyuan Waterproof Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Tongyizhong New Material Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jinlong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Yinwang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Zehong New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangxin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangxin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Marlboro New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Marlboro New Material Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Vnovo New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Vnovo New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Longyi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Misource New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gmark New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Gmark New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Emf New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Emf New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yijin New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Eheng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Kangjiesi New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Sturdyarmor New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Symer New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing Symer New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hk Bd Group Limited Supplier Evaluation
Hk Bd Group Limited Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Guangzhou Wesdar Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wesdar Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rnkj Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Rnkj Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Laibang Import And Export Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Laibang Import And Export Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Gnl Elevator Spare Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Gnl Elevator Spare Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Wenzhe Valve Fittings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Wenzhe Valve Fittings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Cisco Fire Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Cisco Fire Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shunxinjie Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shunxinjie Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shenxing Photoelectricity Medical Apparatus Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shenxing Photoelectricity Medical Apparatus Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tianyan Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tianyan Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kixin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kixin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Chongde Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Chongde Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huayue Zhijie Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huayue Zhijie Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sanfeng Cell Phone Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sanfeng Cell Phone Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongyue Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongyue Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Lfn Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Lfn Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Golden Security Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Golden Security Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Jiyang Electromechanical Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Jiyang Electromechanical Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo A-One Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo A-One Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Wanli Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Wanli Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kegao Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Kegao Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026