Weifang Shufukang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Weifang Shufukang New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 37,000+㎡ and 190+ staff. The company offers polymer and plastic raw material products including LLDPE agricultural film material, HDPE granules, virgin polypropylene resin, polyethylene mulch film grade material, and polypropylene polymers. Based on the provided data, the supplier shows a moderate production foundation supported by verified supplier status and Finished Product Inspection capability. However, its platform credibility is limited by only 1 year as an Gold Supplier and the absence of Trade Assurance. Commercial performance visibility is weak because recent order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer review data are missing or unavailable. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking preliminary sourcing or sample-level engagement, but large-volume procurement should require further verification of transaction history, quality consistency, and service responsiveness.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 37,000+㎡
- Employees: 190+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a clearly stated factory scale and workforce size, indicating a physical production or operational base rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. A 37,000+㎡ facility and 190+ employees suggest a medium-sized manufacturing capability with some degree of operational stability.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates stronger-than-basic production capacity due to its factory size, staff count, and verified supplier status. However, the data does not include detailed production lines, annual capacity, equipment lists, or factory audit documentation beyond verification status. Therefore, it fits a medium stable factory profile rather than a fully proven large-scale supply chain.

Final Score: 17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: False
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service available, Minor customization

Elaboration:
The supplier has basic platform credibility through Gold Supplier status and several operational labels. Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability are positive indicators, while ODM and minor customization suggest some service flexibility.

Scoring Rationale:
The platform profile is partially credible but not complete. The Gold Supplier period is short at only 1 year, and Trade Assurance is not supported, which reduces buyer protection and platform-backed transaction confidence. The presence of inspection and customization labels improves credibility, but the overall compliance structure remains incomplete.

Final Score: 13 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: Insufficient Data
- Transaction amount in past 6 months: Insufficient Data
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration:
The available business performance data does not show recent order volume, transaction value, or store rating. The review count is listed as 0, meaning there is no visible customer feedback base in the provided dataset.

Scoring Rationale:
Because order volume, transaction amount, and store rating are unavailable, commercial validation is weak. The absence of reviews further limits confidence in real buyer acceptance and repeat transaction performance. This does not necessarily indicate poor performance, but the data is insufficient to prove strong business activity.

Final Score: 6 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤19h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
- ODM service available: Yes
- Minor customization: Yes

Elaboration:
The supplier shows some customization capability through ODM service and minor customization labels. However, the response time of up to 19 hours is not highly competitive compared with suppliers responding within one hour.

Scoring Rationale:
Service capability appears functional but not strong. The supplier supports basic customization-related services, but there is no evidence of Full Customization, dedicated engineering support, or faster communication efficiency. The response time suggests acceptable but not high-speed service responsiveness.

Final Score: 6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is excellent based on the provided data. A 100.0% rate indicates that recorded deliveries were completed within the expected shipping timeline.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest score range. Since the provided figure is 100.0%, the supplier receives full marks for this dimension. However, the dataset does not provide the number of orders behind this rate.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Yes
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has quality-related indicators such as Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. These are useful safeguards, especially for product consistency and pre-shipment quality control. However, customer-side quality validation is unavailable.

Scoring Rationale:
The quality control structure has some positive elements, but customer feedback is insufficient. With no store rating and 0 reviews, there is no visible buyer satisfaction record to support claims of stable quality performance. The score reflects the presence of basic inspection mechanisms but limited market-validated quality evidence.

Final Score: 12 / 20

Total Score

64 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for preliminary sourcing, sample testing, and small-to-medium trial orders. The supplier has a reasonable factory foundation, verified supplier status, Finished Product Inspection, and strong reported delivery performance. However, buyers should be cautious with large-volume procurement because recent transaction data, store rating, and customer reviews are insufficient. Key risks include limited commercial validation, no Trade Assurance support, short Gold Supplier history, and slow-to-moderate response speed. Growth potential exists if the supplier can demonstrate stronger transaction history, customer feedback, faster communication, and more complete platform protection.